Missing Links: Let’s Get Rid of the I-710

Screen_shot_2010_08_27_at_10.46.43_AM.pngThe 710 can provide alternate routes. Photo: Atwater Village Newbie/Flickr

While clean port advocates are celebrating a federal court ruling allowing the Port of Los Angeles to go forward with its Clean Trucks program, the push to widen freeways partially to help these trucks move through our region remains strong.  While there’s little doubt that "clean trucks" are better for the region than "dirty" ones, it’s also evident that the best thing for air quality would be "less trucks."

One of the highways that generates the most debate about how many more cars and trucks it should hold is the I-710.  While the "connector" project near South Pasadena holds is most fascinating to the media and public, a widening project in Long Beach is also scheduled.  These projects will take a huge toll on the region in the form of billions of dollars in fiscal cost, an un-discussed amount of traffic created by induced demand, congestion created during the construction phases and the continued deterioration of air quality for the people living near these freeways.  That’s a heavy cost to create space for more "clean" trucks to use our roads.

While many reformers push freight rail as an alternative to trucks, clean or dirty; an op/ed in the Los Angeles Business Journal has a third suggestion:


Previously suggested improvements in the freeway’s more than
two-decade history include digging a massive tunnel, and steamrolling
thousands of businesses and many thousands of homes in some of the few
livable neighborhoods left in that part of Los Angeles.

If we really want to improve traffic flow between Long Beach and the
San Gabriel Valley, we should tear down the entire 710, because it is
inherently inadequate to the task.

The op/ed’s author, Richard Risemberg of Bicycle Fixation fame, goes on to list other American cities that have taken down express ways and have actually seen improved traffic flow.  One famous example:

In 1989, San Francisco took the lemon presented by a massive earthquake
that knocked down the Embarcadero Freeway, and instead of rebuilding it,
made very sweet lemonade, indeed, carting away the rubble and
demolishing what was left standing by the shaker. The revived
Embarcadero is a centerpiece of San Francisco’s civic life and economy.

There are some pretty steep costs involved with tearing down a freeway, but of course the benefits can be substantial also.  Activists concerned with reducing truck traffic along the 710 Corridor might want to consider pushing this alternative.  After all, the agencies would have to comply.  We already know that any idea for the I-710, no matter how ridiculous or destructive it is, shouldn’t be criticized before its been thoroughly studied.


No 710 Coalition: No on Measure J

(This is the third of four op/eds on Measure J that Streetsblog will publish this week. Monday, Gloria Ohland of Move L.A. made the case for Measure J and Wednesday Streetsblog Board Member Joel Epstein did the same. In between, the BRU made their case for a no vote. – DN) Only in the car capital of the world could […]

Guest Op/Ed: Gaps in 710 Tunnel Arguments

Photo: Big Mike Lakers/Flickr (I’ve noticed that ever since South Pasadena passed a resolution cooling some of their resistance to the 710 Big Dig that the War of Words over the project has picked back up.  While researching an article on that issue, I came across “Under the Paperweight: Gaps in 710 Tunnel Arguments” at […]

Who Is Lining Up to Fight Measure M

So far, most of Streetsblog L.A.’s coverage of Measure M, Metro’s sales tax proposal that will be on the fall ballot, has been positive. With our eyes fixed on graphics showing the growth of our rail and rapid bus network, a robust active transportation funding program, and some flexibility in the language allocating highway funding; […]