Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

Parking Lots Shouldn’t Take Up Prime Streetfront Real Estate

2282056253_0b5dd5c914.jpgThe parking lot is behind these Boca Raton residences. (Photo: faceless b via Flickr)

It might seem like a simple idea — that having an enormous parking
lot in front of a business makes it unattractive to pedestrians and
disrupts the fabric of a neighborhood. Unfortunately, this is the way
that huge swaths of American towns and cities are designed.

This morning, Kaid Benfield at NRDC Switchboard
posts about a relatively simple reversal that can make a real
difference in the quality of a community’s street life: Put the parking
in the back. He concedes that it’s not a solution for purists:

Some advocates might just wish that cars would go away entirely, or
that communities make it so inconvenient or costly for their drivers
that they dwindle in number.  But, for most places, that isn’t
realistic and could even be counterproductive, chasing businesses out
of central cities and exacerbating sprawl at a time when we should be
doing the opposite. What we can realistically do is to make
sure our buildings and streetscapes are fully supportive of
environment- and community-friendly modes of travel. Placing the
parking to the rear still allows access for drivers while attracting
more walkers and transit users in front. 

That’s the configuration that I encountered when visiting a
relatively new neighborhood in Las Vegas a couple of weeks ago. The
central shopping mall was designed with streetfront stores and an
interior parking lot; on a pretty Sunday afternoon, it attracted a
significant amount of foot traffic from the surrounding residences. The
place is deeply car-dependent, but there was still a sense of
neighborhood activity and interaction that is largely absent in
developments where parking sits in front of retail. While people living
there drive to work, they consider it normal to walk to a neighborhood
café.

Perfect? No. Better? Definitely.

Benfield’s post is well worth reading in full, so head on over.

More from around the network: Bike Friendly Oak Cliff has a harsh critique of a "complete street" plan in that Dallas community. DC Bicycle Transportation Examiner looks at the ratio of homicides by stranger to traffic fatalities (hint: the second number is higher). And WalkBikeJersey does some dispiriting math on fare hikes for bicyclists using transit in that state.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Friday’s Headlines

Valley-Westside rail, South Bay rail, transit-oriented housing, green WeHo bike lanes, Country Club housing, LAPD, Avenue 60, car-nage, and more

January 23, 2026

January 2026 Metro Board Round-Up: Sepulveda Rail Approved, Torrance Rail Kneecapped

Valley-Westside subway plan approved. South Bay light rail delayed significantly, perhaps indefinitely.

January 22, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines

ICE, crosswalks, bus lane enforcement, Sepulveda rail, Torrance rail, Long Beach, MacArthur Park, LADOT, and more

January 22, 2026

Extending the Foothill A Line Hasn’t Been Forgotten

Plans are underway to get the track built to Claremont, and stakeholders remain hopeful that Montclair can make a comeback.

January 21, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

ICE, Metro meeting tomorrow, Torrance, transit ambassadors, Santa Monica, Glendale, red light cameras, Koreatown, Long Beach parking, car-nage, and more

January 21, 2026

Uh Oh! Dueling Alignments Could Throw Torrance Metro Rail Extension into Limbo

Metro's plan for a four-mile light rail extension from Redondo Beach to Torrance could get a lot more difficult, and more expensive

January 20, 2026
See all posts