Two Troubling Transportation Numbers for the Obama Administration

Yesterday brought news of two grim transportation numbers from the Obama administration: 2 and $53 million.

marta15.jpgAtlanta’s Metro won a share of the emissions-cutting transit grants that the White House proposes to cut next year. (Photo: Atlanta Metblogs)

first figure is the percentage of federal transport stimulus contracts
that have gone to disadvantaged and minority-owned businesses,
according to the U.S. DOT. The 2-percent figure was released this
afternoon by the Transportation Equity Network (TEN), which included
government emails verifying its data.

In real dollar terms, that 2 percent comes out to $986 million
of the stimulus law’s $48 billion in total transportation spending. The
low total for disadvantaged and minority firms, known by the shorthand
of DBEs, comes five months after Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced a $20 million bonding program aimed at helping less well-connected companies compete for federal business.

"This number is absolutely shocking," TEN executive director Laura Barrett said in a statement. "Secretary LaHood is
encouraging state DOTs to increase allocations to minority and disadvantaged
contractors, but this number proves that encouragement is not enough. The old
boys network that locks out minority contractors was built on the state and
local level, and it needs to be fought at that level to reverse this outrageous

Anecdotal reports of minority contractors getting shortchanged by transportation stimulus spending have emerged in Illinois, Minnesota, and California, among other states. The 2005 federal transportation law states that
at least 10 percent of federal roads and transit spending should be
routed through DBEs, unless the Transport Secretary determines

The second not-so-great transportation number, $53
million, reflects the total spending on pollution-reducing transit
grants that the White House included in its budget proposal for fiscal year 2011.

administration hopes to steer nearly 10 times that amount, or nearly
$530 million, to its new three-agency partnership for sustainable
communities. Still, the Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI)
pulled out the $53 million number today to note that the White House
had proposed $22 million more for the same type of transit grants last year (and ended up spending $100 million).

From the EESI’s budget statement (emphasis theirs):

A focus on livability is expected to have benefits for air quality,
public health, energy savings, and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction. The
rest of the proposed budget, however, represents very little change in
how these issues and public goals are addressed. A special fund to help
reduce GHG emissions within FTA, in fact, saw a significant decrease from $75 million to $53 million.


Questioning Obama’s Transpo Legacy as Fresno County Sprawls

By introducing new initiatives like the TIGER grant program, the Obama administration has been signaling that the car-is-king, slash-and-burn mentality that has dominated transportation policy since Eisenhower is coming to a close. At the same time, however, the situation on the ground looks awfully familiar in much of America. As New Jersey Governor Chris Christie […]

Tell Congress: Don’t Waste Money on Highway Expansion

States should know better than to funnel more money into road expansion at the expense of maintenance. With President-elect Obama back in Washington, action is heating up again around the economic recovery package, which could total up to $850 billion over the next two years. As much as $100 billion may be at stake for […]