The National Perspective: New Report Maps the Gap Between Pedestrian Risks and Federal Safety Aid

dangerous.pngThe top 10 most dangerous cities for pedestrians. (Chart: Dangerous by Design report)

the equivalent of one jumbo jet full of Americans died every month, the
resulting public outcry would be deafening. Or would it?

Anne Canby, the former Delaware transportation secretary who heads the Surface Transportation Policy Partnership (STPP), raised that question today as her organization helped unveil a new report
on the nation’s pedestrian safety outlook. In fact, Canby said, nearly
5,000 U.S. pedestrians die every year in traffic crashes — but the
resulting public health risk has yet to register as an urgent national

The report released today, a joint effort by STPP and
Transportation for America (T4A), ranks the nation’s most dangerous
cities for pedestrians and bicyclists according to a "danger index"
that factors in the number of residents who walk to work.

top 10 most dangerous areas (viewable above) were all located in the
south. Florida has the dubious distinction of hosting the top four
riskiest cities, though the study’s authors noted that the state’s
large percentage of retirees were not disproportionally represented in
fatality data.

The rankings are likely to be troubling
for residents of the most dangerous cities, but the report’s rundown of
federal safety spending paints just as lackluster a picture.

Since the 2005 transportation bill
took effect, according to the report, U.S. cities with populations
greater than 1 million have spent an average of $1.39 per person in
federal money on pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Under the 1998
transportation bill, the same U.S. cities spent just $0.82 per person
in federal money — a rise that today’s report deems "a vast
improvement" but Canby finds lacking.

"Safety for
pedestrians has not really advanced a great deal over this period,"
Canby told reporters today, adding that walking and biking have yet to
be "regarded as full forms of transportation."

Pedestrian and
bicycle safety is often funded through Transportation Enhancements
(TE), a program that sets aside 10 percent of each state’s aid from
Washington for green transport. But as Streetsblog Capitol Hill reported last month, TE took a disproportionate hit when congressional inaction forced the cancellation of $8.7 billion in state DOT contract authority.

authors of today’s report delved deeper into that trend and found that
most state officials sit on their hands when it comes to spending
available bicycle and pedestrian money, both for safety and better

[M]ost states have not fully
utilized these funds, obligating (i.e., actually spending) only 80.4
percent of the nearly $9.4 billion made available through the
Transportation Enhancements program since 1992, and only 35 percent of
the Safe Routes to Schools program since 2005. This leaves federal
funds, which could be dedicated to improving pedestrian and bicyclist
safety, effectively unspent. This is not for lack of local need or
interest in such projects, by and large, but rather a reflection of
state DOTs’ priorities. …

Worse still, the large amount of unspent funds in those
programs make them a prime target for meeting federal [cancellation]
requirements … In FY 2008 alone, states returned over $98.5 million
in TE funds to the federal government through rescis- sions, equivalent
to a 12 percent reduction in the 2008 apportionment of TE funds.

Federal Highway Administration records, the report’s authors found an
average of 1.5 percent of federal transportation spending is focused on
pedestrian and bicycle safety, while pedestrians alone account for 11.5
percent of traffic fatalities.

"We’re worried that this is
only going to get worse," Dr. Linda Degutis, associate professor of
emergency medicine and public health at Yale University, told reporters
today. "We’ve not seen a significant decline in injuries or deaths of

What can be done to remedy the whopping
safety funding gap? Requiring that federal safety money be spent in an
amount proportional to the risk facing pedestrians would be a place to
start, but the report focuses on the advantages of a national "complete streets" policy that would tell transportation planners to accommodate all road users.

In its statement on
the STPP/T4A report, the National Complete Streets Coalition urges
adoption of that national policy, which is part of the six-year, $500
billion national infrastructure bill that’s currently stalled in the House.

preventing the cannibalizing of TE funds when it comes time for state
officials to trim their budgets is likely to require nothing short of a
cultural upheaval in many areas. The more that local residents speak up
about the need to spend available federal money on pedestrian and
bicycle infrastructure — as well as on air quality improvements, also disproportionately hit this year — the better.


Transportation Committee Questions LAPD’s 8,000+ Annual Ped Tickets

This afternoon the Los Angeles City Council Transportation Committee discussed a motion questioning the effectiveness of LAPD’s “jaywalking” enforcement. The pedestrian enforcement motion, 15-0546, was authored by City Councilmember Mike Bonin, who chairs the committee. LAPD reported that there was no way to provide the analysis requested in the motion, but did provide some pedestrian enforcement […]

Why Are Cyclists Included in Distracted Driving Bill?

Photo: markofphotography A bill introduced last month by State Senator Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto), who has been a steady advocate for reducing the dangers of distracted driving, would increase first-time and repeat fines for drivers who text while driving or who don’t use hands-free devices, and would extend the prohibition of cell phone use to […]