Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

Is There Such a Thing as Too Much Emphasis on Safety?

There's a lot of focus this month on getting more people out and about on their bikes. We posted last week about the effort to normalize bike commuting,
a topic that as usual sparked a lot of discussion about sweat,
appropriate clothing, secure bike parking and, of course, safety.

holland_300x298.jpgHow they promote cycling in Holland.

Today we'd like to talk more about the safety issue -- or, more precisely, the perception-of-safety issue. M-bike.org, a Streetsblog Network member in Detroit, has a post comparing the Dutch approach to promoting cycling with events like the "Ride of Silence",
an international annual event -- begun in America -- that honors
bicyclists who have been killed by traffic while riding (2009's ride
will be held tomorrow):

Last month Copenhagenize noted the Dutch Bicycle Council’scollection of positive cycling promotions. Those photos certainly makecycling look safe, accessible, convenient and fun. There’s no Lycra andalmost no helmets.

Contrast that with the Ride of Silence events that mourn cyclists killed or injured while biking -- putting the focus on how unsafe cycling can be.

Does this message encourage more people to ride a bicycle?

Does this message make it more or less likely that parents will let their kids bike to school?

The Copenhagenize site -- which posted a parody of the widely circulated Danish video of cops giving cyclists helmets -- has taken a strong stand against helmet promotion, precisely because of the effect it has on perceptions of cycling as a safe activity.

Of
course, Denmark and the Netherlands are countries that have
well-established cycling cultures. Here in the U.S., we are just at the
beginning (we hope) of establishing such a culture. The question is how
to do it.

So what do you think? Is it possible to
emphasize safety too much when it comes to cycling, thereby scaring off
a significant number of people, especially when research shows that more cyclists means safer cyclists? Is it counterproductive to emphasize the dangers to cyclists with things like ghost bikes and memorial rides? Or -- here in America, land of the automobile -- do we need to emphasize safety over all other concerns?

Full disclosure: I always wear a helmet when I ride.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

This Week In Livable Streets

Metro L.A. River path deadline, Transit Equity Day celebrates Rosa Parks, Whittier Narrows ride, Metro Public Safety, and more.

February 2, 2026

Eyes on the Street: WeHo Paints All of its Bike Lanes Green

West Hollywood is installing modest safety improvements on Fairfax Avenue, San Vicente Boulevard, and Santa Monica Boulevard

February 2, 2026

Monday’s Headlines

ICE, Culver City, Waymo, Foothill A Line, World Cup, Transit Equity Day, Norwalk, car-nage, and more

February 2, 2026

Comment on Metro L.A. River Path Project by Monday, February 2

SBLA Editor recommends trimming scope towards a fiscally feasible 8-mile project, not Metro's $1B proposed design

January 30, 2026

Friday’s Headlines

ICE terror, national shutdown, participating businesses, protests, journalist arrest, ICE backlash, unity rides

January 30, 2026

Alhambra Approves New Pilot Bus Routes

City council knew rerouting wouldn’t please everyone, but eventually it passed 4-0. The bus network reconfiguration is projected to increase ridership 19%.

January 29, 2026
See all posts