City Council Takes Aim at CALTRANS Safe Routes to Schools


(Editor’s note: I sat on the Caltrans’ Safe Routes to School Committee for District 7 during the last cycle.  Any opinions expressed in this piece are mine and not necessarily the opinions of Caltrans staff or other committee members.)

A resolution on today’s City Council Transportation Committee Agenda expresses their frustration with the amount of money the city receives from state Safe Routes to School grants.  The text of the resolution seems to point blame at the city’s failure to receive what it considers its fare share of state funding, based on the percent of California’s students that go to school in Los Angeles, at a process that they perceive to be biased against the City.

The resolution focuses on three areas of the state’s Safe Routs to Schools program: how the funding is divided amongst Caltrans’ districts, the makeup of the local committee who decides how District 7 funds are allocated and the committee’s scoring criteria.  District 7 includes Los Angeles and Ventura counties and the request for funds outstrips the small amount of funds that are available.

In particular, the resolution states:

In response to the Department’s concerns, the Council amended the recommendations contained in the June 30, 2008 LADOT report to direct the Department to prepare a letter to Caltrans asking for the scores by evaluation criteria for prior cycle Safe Routes to School Program projects.

City staff has worked with Caltrans over the past few months pressing for an open, transparent process, however, few changes have been made. It appears that each Caltrans district will receive funding proportional to student population for the eighth cycle of the state Safe Routes to School program, but no other substantive changes will be made. The City needs to proactively address these issues to ensure that a fair share of these funds are given to Southern California and that these monies are appropriately awarded to the most deserving projects.

I THEREFORE MOVE that the Council request Caltrans to present the evaluation criteria, details on the evaluation committee membership, project selection process and the determination behind the allocation of funding for the State and Federal Safe Routes to School Programs.

Hopefully the committee rejects this proposal, because it sort of doesn’t make sense.  Before I was appointed to the committee, I asked Caltrans for a copy of their scoring criteria for a past story on Safe Routes to School and they printed a copy for me on the spot.  As for who is on the committee, well, that’s public information and while I can’t remember all of the names of the people whom served with me, I can tell you that the majority of the members were residents of the City of Los Angeles.  If any Council Member is looking for the scoring information and can’t find Caltrans’ phone number, you can find mine at the bottom of this page and I’ll be happy to fax a copy over.

Speaking of open and transparent processes and Safe Routes to School, back in July the same City Council Committee heard testimony that the City of Los Angeles, unlike the surrounding municipalities, doesn’t work closely with the community when writing their funding requests for the Safe Routes to School’s jokes.  From a July 10 Streetsblog story om a City Council Transportation Hearing:

However, just because optimism was king, doesn’t mean that problems
with the city’s bike planning were glossed over.  Glen Bailey, a member
of his Neighborhood Council and the city’s
official Bike Advisory Committee was especially critical of the city’s
outreach effort noting that while he had heard of the community
meetings through the LABAC, his Neighborhood Council never received

To follow-up on this, I talked to representatives from a couple of Neighborhood Councils yesterday, and none of them said they had heard from LADOT about upcomignSafe Routes to Schools proposals. 

Photo of Portland’s SRtS Program from I Share the Road/Flickr


Speed Humps Installed Surrounding Nine Valley Schools

Miranda Chavez, Student Body Vice President for Langdon Elementary, speaks as some other politicians and students look on. Photo: Office of Richard Alarcon City Councilman Richard Alarcon has always been a vocal supporter for traffic calming and safe streets around schools and other places that children congregate. In 2007, he introduced legislation calling for the […]

Governor Brown Signs Protected Bike Lane Bill, Car Fee for Bike Paths

Governor Jerry Brown signed two bills on Saturday that will make it easier for California cities to build better bike infrastructure. The governor approved Assembly Bill 1193, which means protected bike lanes, or cycletracks, will become an official part of Caltrans’ guidelines on bike infrastructure. Brown also signed Senate Bill 1183, which will allow local governments […]

Eric Cantor Postpones Battle Over Safe Routes Funding

Image via Bike Portland (Update: Cantor’s office responded below that the reason the “Safe Routes to School” funding cuts can’t be found on the site was because the vote on this proposal ended and that it could be a YouCut proposal again in the future.  Streetsblog will monitor YouCut to see when it comes up […]

Who Do We Blame for the Next Death on the Glendale-Hyperion Bridge?

In a unanimous 11-0 vote, the Los Angeles City Council approved the city Bureau of Engineering’s (BOE) single-sidewalk pedestrian-killer design for the Glendale-Hyperion Bridge. Though the item was not approved at the Public Works Committee last week, the City Council approved the item today with no public comment, after brief misleading characterizations by Councilmembers Tom LaBonge and Mitch O’Farrell. […]

Bike Hubs? Walkable Orange Line? What’s Your Favorite Planned Transportation Project? CRA Vote Could Help Determine Its Future

Regardless of one’s feelings on the dissolution of Community Redevelopment Agencies mandated by Governor Jerry Brown, there are some important transportation projects left hanging by a thread in Los Angeles by the sudden departure of one of the city’s largest grant receiving agencies.  Tomorrow, the CRA’s Governing Board will vote on the fate of many […]