Desert Dispatch and OC Register Add to Anti-Feuer Editorials

As we get closer to next week’s hearing on Mike Feuer’s transportation funding legislation, you can expect to see more and more piling on as newspapers trip over themselves to see who can write the worst editorial.  So far, the Press Enterprise’s "Daily Dude" still has that distinction.

So far, LA Streetsblog has dissected three editorials, with a fourth one coming later today. The vitriol against Feuer seems to stem from how he cast some of his legislation as anti-global warming. However, to just discuss the legislation in terms of climate change denies a conversation about what is at stake locally.

Los Angeles County doesn’t have the funds to build the transit projects that are needed to relieve congestion in the region’s long term future. Feuer’s legislation aims to make it easier, after a vote of the people in the county, to correct that by identifying new funding sources. Placing a user fees on the cars and trucks that pollute the most, which incidently also tend to be the ones that weigh the most and thus do the most damage to roads, is a sensible solution.

Nevertheless, the Desert Dispatch today chose to reprint an editorial written this weekend by the Orange County Register. The editorial has a lot of the global-warming-denial language we’ve become accustomed to, but ends with a real head scratcher. Emphasis added by Streetsblog.

But facts don’t deter schemes like Mr. Feuer’s to raise $400 million in additional taxes to pay for already funded transit projects. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority would have to place the issue on the ballot if AB2558 becomes law, and probably would do so because the agency would reap the bounty.

I’m not sure what the Register is talking about, but Metro has been very public about the fact that it doesn’t have the money to build all of the rail projects that LA County needs in the coming decades.

Earlier in its anti-tax screed, the Register and Desert Dispatch argue that Feuer is just using global warming to frame the debate because "If it (congestion) went away tomorrow, politicians would be unable to persuade voters to tax themselves to fix it." If the Sun and Register have their way, we won’t even have a shot to make congestion go away, so figuring out a different way to get voters to tax themselves won’t be an issue.


  • I just love the idea that the only negative outcome that private motor vehicles cause is traffic.

  • Well actually, Fred, according to our models, traffic is caused by multi-modal conflicts and bottlenecks. You see, slow, entitled, pedestrians and those lmbering whales of the road (buses) cause traffic delays.

    If everyone would simply get with the program, and get a decent car (I’m looking at you, poor people), we’d have this traffic problem nipped in the bud.

  • Fred, here’s a good way of getting at what you’re getting at. If you stop eating anything with any nutrients – say you just eat 7-11 hot dogs and drink pop – what happens? Do you get sick in just one way?

    No. You get fat. You lose energy. You get sick easier. Your organs are challenged. Generally you will start to suck in a multitude of ways.

    Too much of one thing always manifests itself as a multitude of problems. When I ride a 800ft climb as hard as I can the system failure is holistic – my legs hurt, my heart rate goes through the roof, my respiration rate maxes, I make bad decisions while my oxygen is low, my riding line waivers, I’m wiped out when I get home, and the next day I’m sore.

    Too much reliance on the private car for transportation leads to a multitude of failures: traffic, asthma, use of public space almost exclusively for transportation, pedestrian fatalities, cyclist fatalities, motorist fatalities, no affordable alternatives etc etc etc.

  • Simon

    It’s really gonna be an uphill battle to get anything passed in this town.

    I’m impressed at the idiotic opposition’s ability to reframe everything as a referendum on global warming instead of as a basic infrastructure bill that everyone could probably agree on.

  • Rear side. , z perfect tits and ass, [url=”″]z perfect tits and ass[/url], z perfect tits and ass, fine art male nude photography, [url=””]fine art male nude photography[/url], fine art male nude photography, free porn movie samples, [url=””]free porn movie samples[/url], free porn movie samples, brazilian ass fucked, [url=””]brazilian ass fucked[/url], brazilian ass fucked, naked beach babes, [url=”″]naked beach babes[/url], naked beach babes,

  • Бесплатно одноклассники! | Поиск секс-партнеров на одну ночь, для регулярных тайных встреч, группового секса и многого другого! одноклассники порно, порно фото одноклассники. Сайт


Metro Rider and Streetsblog Join Forces for Feuer Bills

In an attempt to push back against the negative editorials that seem to be released daily against Mike Feuer’s attempts to increase funding options for LA County Metro, the main writers for LA Streetsblog and Metro Rider LA went to their keyboards and fired off some letters to the newspapers in question.  The first ran […]

Papers Ganging Up on Feuer Legislation

Last week we saw the Investor’s Business Daily advise people that global warming doesn’t exist and any tax on gas is a bad idea. IBD isn’t the only voice criticising Feuer’s legislation, the Press-Enterprise’s "Daily Dude" is enraged at the mere thought of increasing the gas tax to help fight global warming but leaves out any substantial discussion to leave […]

Investor’s Magazine: Hooray for Highways! Boo for Gas Taxes!

The Investor’s Business Daily has written an editorial extolling the virtues of wider freeways and lower gas taxes. It’s a great piece of car culture thinking from the last century. Taken with State Farm’s advertisement bashing bike commuters as poorly dressed losers, it really shows how far we still have to go. At issue is the […]

Feuer’s Sales Tax and Climate Change Bills Pass Committee

The California Assembly Transportation Committee passed Assemblyman Mike Feuer’s legislation that would allow LA County to place measures on the ballot to fund transportation projects.  A.B. 2321 allows for the county to levy an additional half cent sales tax that would go directly to transportation projects after approval by two-thirds of voters.  The controversial A.B. […]

Feuer’s Funding Bills Head to Hearings Next Week (Updated)

The First Step to Getting This Funded Happens Next Week in Sacramento West Los Angeles Assemblyman Mike Feuer has emerged as a strong advocate of empowering L.A. City and County to raise its own funds to fix the current transportation funding crisis. Frustrated by the state’s chronic inability to fund either Metro’s operating needs or […]