Report: CA Cap-and-Trade Program Is Up to Snuff

Screen shot 2015-01-14 at 12.37.16 PM
The Environmental Defense Fund’s new report says California’s cap-and-trade system is succeeding

Note: The original post has been edited slightly to clear up a misconception. Companies subject to the emissions cap cannot pay for the right to exceed the cap.

The Environmental Defense Fund released a report this morning that says the second year of California’s cap-and-trade program is a success on several fronts.

The report, “Carbon Market California Year Two” [PDF], follows up on its first-year report by analyzing results from the 2013-14 cap-and-trade program.

Cap-and-trade is the part of California’s climate change law that puts teeth into the state’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It works by defining an upper limit, or “cap,” on emissions for different industry sectors, and creating credits per ton of carbon pollution.

Companies are allowed a certain number of “free” emission credits, and a limited number are also made available for auction — thus the “trade” part, wherein companies buy and sell credits amongst themselves. The total number of available credits, free and auctioned, equals the industry-wide emissions cap.

The cap is set to shrink over time as the state moves towards its carbon emission reduction goals, thus requiring companies to further reduce  emissions. At the same time, the price of emission allowances will rise as competition for them becomes hotter, and the more a company can reduce its emissions the fewer credits it will need.

Revenues from the auctions are to be used for projects that can help the state further reduce emissions, for example by building affordable housing near transit, although raising money is not one of the goals of the program.

According to the report, California is succeeding in limiting, pricing, and reducing emissions by getting industries to pay for the pollution they produce.

Key conclusions from the report after the jump:

  • Despite dire predictions that cap-and-trade would destroy California industry, the state’s economy is  thriving, and the number of jobs is growing, even faster than in the rest of the country. This is especially true in the green tech sector, where the job growth rate, at five percent, was even higher than the statewide average. It is a small portion of the economy, but these are early days.
  • Emissions that are subject to the cap are decreasing, mostly from declining emissions in the energy sector as electricity producers shift to cleaner, renewable sources—including electricity from outside the state. (How close that gets us to state goals is a whole ‘nother discussion). Emissions from sectors not subject to the cap last year, including transportation fuel suppliers, went in the opposite direction, increasing slightly—yet another argument against efforts to delay bringing them into the program.
  • The carbon market is healthy, with stable prices and active participation. “The result of the nine quarterly auctions through November 2014 demonstrate that companies are taking this program seriously and factoring a carbon price into their business strategies,” according to the report. An active secondary market wherein state-approved offset credits are traded has also shown stable prices, reflecting “confidence, familiarity, and participation in the market.”
  • California industries are complying with the program. All of the companies subject to the cap have complied with requirements to report their emissions and surrender credits by the first deadline, “demonstrating that entities are omitted to complying with the program and are aware of what is expected of them moving forward.”
  • While the programs that invest money raised from cap-and-trade are in their early stages, they hold promise for producing greenhouse gas emission reductions in ways that the state otherwise would not have been able to encourage or force, for example by promoting transit-oriented development.
  • Fears that California is trying to solve a global issue alone are allayed by the international interest being shown. California’s cap-and-trade system has already formally linked its program with one in Quebec, holding a successful joint auction of credits held last fall. California has signed agreements with Mexico, Peru, Israel, and China to share information and lessons learned about emissions trading programs, and joined the Pacific Coast Collaborative with Washington, Oregon, British Colombia to pursue common policy approaches to climate change.

In addition to details about these points, the report contains interviews with a number of economic and climate change policy experts from around the world.

Email tips, alerts, press releases, ideas, etc. to melanie@streetsblog.org.

For social media coverage focused on statewide issues, follow Melanie @currymel on Twitter or like our Facebook page here.

7 thoughts on Report: CA Cap-and-Trade Program Is Up to Snuff

  1. HSR is about the smartest thing this generation will ever accomplish and sadly that is not saying much. We wasted 2-3 trillion bombing a bunch of people in caves, mud huts and tents for the last 15 years so hopefully this generation can at least eek out one HSR project before it dies off.

  2. Don’t forget accrued interest over time of paying off that 2-3 trill. The biggest wasteful govt handout of all, US Military/Contractors fighting useless wars that only beget more conflict and spark more hatred and enemies. The solution is to invest in place, and make out country stronger from the inside out.

  3. How is raising the price of gas by 75 cents a gallon helping anyone? This is more bullshit dreamed up by our incompetent “leaders”

  4. No CA cap-and-trade policy has raised the price of gas by 75 cents. I wish it would, because I think that would help a lot of people by getting many drivers to think twice about driving, and instead bike, walk or take transit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Sen. Steinberg Proposes Carbon Tax on Gas Instead of Cap-and-Trade

|
CA Senator Darrell Steinberg proposed a change yesterday to California’s nascent cap-and-trade program that would replace next year’s cap on fuel emissions with a per-gallon carbon tax. Steinberg called it a “broader, more stable, and more flexible” way to reduce emissions from fuels than cap-and-trade. His proposal would apply the revenue raised from the tax […]

Transportation Priorities Jostle for CA’s Cap-and-Trade Revenue

|
A series of hearings in Sacramento have been revisiting California’s Global Warming Solutions Act, Assembly Bill (A.B.) 32, which calls for a statewide reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) to 1990 levels by 2020. Two recent hearings have opened discussions of Governor Jerry Brown’s proposed spending plan for the revenue received so far from the state’s […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Funding California Rail With Cap-and-Trade Revenue Hits a Snag

|
California’s cap-and-trade program is one of the boldest state-level climate change policies in the U.S. By capping statewide carbon pollution and then auctioning off emissions allowances, the state hopes to both reduce greenhouse gas emissions and generate about $10.6 billion for projects to improve energy efficiency. Among other things, that money would support various rail and transit projects, including the state’s high-speed rail line. The state […]

Golden State Could Be Sitting on Livable Streets Gold Mine

|
(The debate over how to spend the state’s cap-and-trade funding source was already hot last year. This year, it could become one of the largest transportation stories in the state, competing even with High Speed Rail. As such, Streetsblog L.A. welcomes op/ed pieces on how to best use those funds. Email ideas to damien@streetsblog.org – […]