For Santa Monica to Remain a Place of Opportunity for New Residents, Changes Needed to Housing Policies

This non-profit development under construction at 28th & Pico, with 33 affordable units (all of the units at the site) targeted toward 50%-60% of median incomes, features 55 underground parking spaces that drive up construction cost.

Santa Monica has done a lot of things right over the years, such as reinvesting in the public realm, supporting education, improving pedestrian accessibility, funding the Big Blue Bus, and being ahead of the curve regionally on bike facilities. However success is not without its own challenges. While many cities saw real estate prices plummet since  the 2008 US housing market crash, Santa Monica has largely retained high home prices because it is such a desirable place to live.  The downside of this trend is that multifamily residential rents are also climbing.


Overall, Santa Monica’s residents are becoming older and more affluent. Adults 25-44 are a shrinking population while the middle aged population grows, resulting in a nearly 3 year increase to the median age in the city between 1990 and 2010. The median household income has, in inflation adjusted terms, grown more than 12% in the same time period to $68,842.  Meanwhile the L.A. County median household income is $55,476. More statistics on the change in Santa Monica’s demographics are chronicled in a recent staff report on housing needs. Be forewarned, the document is a cumbersome PDF document from a scan that is not text searchable (can governments please stop doing that).

I believe this pressure on Santa Monica is partly a result from increasing demand for reasonably walkable neighborhoods. Santa Monica is rated an average of 82/100, “very walkable” on the popular walkability ranking website Walk Score, with downtown areas scoring in the 90’s. The city is displayed as a deep green on the temperature map of walkable versus unwalkable neighborhoods in the LA region. Walkable neighborhoods are in short supply regionally and nationally due to overbuilding autocentric sprawl and the under utilization of urban infill potential. Look at the heat maps created by Walk Score, and many of the red zones are exactly the places that lost home values, and the patches of green are hotspots for rising rents and strong home values.

Walkable, bikable, and transit accessible areas are commanding such premiums due in part to a significant cultural, economic and demographic shift in housing preference. For millennials, we are increasingly over car culture, or just plain can’t afford the cost of car ownership and rising fuel prices. Home ownership is becoming  unattainable, especially with the strict lending practices following the housing crash, and the significant down-payments required for pricey markets including Santa Monica. Renting is the only viable option for many. For boomers approaching retirement, auto-dependency is beginning to feel more like a liability than the freedom it once represented.

The millennials are the largest generation (about 95 million Americans).  If many millennials, and a substantial number of boomers (about 78 million Americans), both want walkable urbanism at the same time, the situation is a colossal mismatch of housing stock and the housing people now want to live in.

Given these trends, I see two primary ways to maintain affordable living costs in walkable cities and neighborhoods. The first is that the existing walkable and desirable places build up and fill in. This doesn’t require some intense “Manhattanization.” Mid-rise buildings and better land use along transit corridors can alleviate housing demand with low traffic impacts by dropping legal imperatives to build  around cars with a high number of parking spaces mandated by municipal codes.

The second way to balance affordability and recreate value in declining markets, is for places that are presently automobile centric to begin reforming into coherent neighborhoods with walkable destinations. This change requires legal reform so that walkable neighborhood design is not forbidden as it sadly is in too many suburban and rural communities. This change would create a broader market of walkable places to choose from.

The city of Santa Monica has a number of programs for providing affordable housing options through the use of income restricted and subsidized units for those that qualify, with preferences given to those who already live or work in Santa Monica. However the aforementioned staff report on housing observes that existing affordable housing programs are not keeping up with meeting present needs, especially those with lower incomes.

Further complicating issues are the requirements to be listed as “income restricted.  For example, to move into the income restricted Luxe@Broadway development that just opened at Lincoln Blvd. and Broadway Ave.; I would have to take a pay cut to qualify for a studio apartment that costs almost $300 more per month than my current 1 bedroom market rate apartment a few blocks away.

It shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone that Santa Monica housing can’t keep pace with demand. Deliberate acts of policy, zoning and protests by existing homeowners since the 70’s and 80’s have created an environment that suppressed housing development from densifying. Parking requirements add significant cost burdens to major developments, and block the construction of low parking, truly transit oriented development anywhere outside of the downtown core. To build in a truly sustainable or low cost manner on vacant or underutilized sites around the city requires a costly and time consuming process to get a zoning variance, with no guarantee that it will be approved.

Take for example the property under construction now at 28th St. and Pico Boulevard, a site well served by the Big Blue Bus #7 line. It’s a 33 unit multifamily 2 and 3 bedroom apartment building with 55 underground parking spaces. It’s fairly common for residential buildings to provide more housing spaces for cars than housing units due to zoning codes, but this is also a non-profit development with all units targeted for income restricted low and very income households (pg 12). Defined as 60% and 50% of median area income. So this is a development made up entirely of low income households in a high cost of living city, a demographic more likely to have only one car, or not drive at all. However the building will have enough parking for most residents to have 2 cars parked on site.

With limited resources for providing subsidized or non-profit housing, to build out more parking limits how many total housing units can be built by developers. When we choose to add more parking, it always comes at a cost, it is never free (as Shoupistas know well). In the case of providing affordable housing units, more parking equals less affordable housing units per dollar spent. The Southern California Association of Governments estimates underground parking construction at $25,000 per space with each level down an additional +50% more cost per space. If the goal is to get ahead of the affordable housing needs, than saddling every non-profit development with a lot of parking is going to drag against meeting that goal.

Car share parking space with iconic sign post that doubles as bike parking.
Reserved on-street car sharing space in Portland OR, with iconic sign post that doubles as a bike rack.

Living in the LA area, and with a tough job market, many people do depend on cars even with low incomes. With some innovative thinking it is possible to maintain access to an extra vehicle without pushing people into the financial liability of ownership.

A partnership with a car sharing service such as the local start up LAX Carshare or the nationally branded Zipcar can allow easy access to a second car for one car households, with far fewer spaces required than individual ownership. For car-free households, easy access to a shared car can be invaluable for infrequent trips when transit just won’t do because of a far flung location or need for extra cargo hauling. When it comes to embracing car sharing partnerships, Santa Monica lags far behind progressive West Coast cities such as Portland Oregon and San Francisco.

With pending zoning code updates around the corner, following the passage of the LUCE general plan last year, and sweeping changes in housing migration and demographics still playing out, Santa Monica is at a pivotal moment. If the city applies the same thinking that guided development for the past 20 years into the next 20, Santa Monica could become a place largely for the affluent to live out their remaining years amongst tourists and the last hold outs from an earlier era of strict rent control that is no longer allowed by the supreme court.

Some deep rethinking of the nuts and bolts of housing policy is required if the city is to remain a place of opportunity for new comers, maintain income diversity and have a dynamic economy well into the future.

  • Juan Matute

    I would like to see the City prioritize housing socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals who can and want to walk, bike, or take transit to work, in part because it saves them from the expense of owning and maintaining a vehicle. A better use some of the money used to construct parking would have been to subsidize car sharing for residents, allowing them access to a car for the times they need it at a fraction of the cost of owning, maintaining, and operating a vehicle.  The fact that this affordable housing development project expects 50% AMI households to have 1 2/3 vehicles per household either shows that planning requirements are intensive to the needs of a lower-SES household to reduce non-housing expenditures in addition to housing, or that planners and the community have mis-managed a commons problem (competition for free, public, on-street parking) by making it more expensive to construct affordable housing. Either way, Santa Monica can one day do better.

  • good article. Are there four votes on the santa monica city council to eliminate mandatory parking minimums? If not, what coalitions/ campaigns could get to four votes?

  • I think the environment is more to conducive to scrapping the high parking minimums than a few years ago, but it still feels a bit remote at this time. Some council members have finally started pushing back against calls for ever more public parking made by some pro-parking expansion business interests and residents, but I don’t know if they are ready to commit to letting the market decide how many parking spaces are needed on private development. The city likes to pride itself with sustainability labels, but tends to go soft and slow going when it comes to environmental reforms that are more contentious like parking policy.

    The balance could tilt that way a little closer if Frank Gruber, the first non-incumbent I’m aware of declare their intention to run, makes it onto the council in the coming election. He was a longtime local columnist for The Look Out News, who ended his column to pursue office. He is also the author of the book Urban Worrier, a collection of his writing on the weekly drama of hyper local politics and urban planning issues in Santa Monica. Gruber subscribes to a lot of New Urbanist thinking, and often refers to Santa Monica as a post-suburban city. And he often rides a bikes to public meetings too, I’ve seen him out there.

  • Juventus in Serie  A League success, achieved a run of 4 consecutive wins in the championship over  AC Milan 1branch. Soccer cleats In the over-the-counter  Juventus also have good news, Juventus official website recently announced that  from next season, teams will replace the shirt sponsors, Soccer shop famous  brand car Jeep ( Jeep ) will be in the next season, as the club’s new sponsor.  The club recently  specially issued a statement: adidas  adipure 11Pro SL TRX” Juventus and Fiat Group has had three Cristiano  Ronaldo cleats season sponsorship contract, begin from July 1,  2012, the Fiat Group will become the Juventus all events only designated  sponsor, David Beckham  shoes sponsoring amount will reach35000000 euros, and Fiat will  also become a club car supplier, Jeep will appear in the the team’s  jerseys.”  There are35000000  Euro acquisition, Lionel Messi  cleats coupled with the current team of excellent record, this  will greatly accelerate the adidas F50  adizero TRX Juventus thoroughly Renaissance footsteps. According  to Italy media reports, Nike soccer cleats Marotta will be in  the summer there are a lot of big appear. First of all, adidas F50  adizero prime coach Conti has requested by Marotta to bid for  Udinese versatile midfielder Asamoah, Adidas soccer cleats the Garner  midfielder has been very affected by Conti’s favor, in the next season,  Juventus in the champions of the premise, Nike CTR360 Maestri II increase a  midfielder is necessary, it is worth mentioning that, in the last round of the  Serie A, Asamoah eye-catching performance, Nike CTR360 Maestri II elite the plum  to open two degrees to help the team 3-1defeated team Palma, at the same time,  Asamoah is AC Milan at long prey, Nike Total 90 Laser IV Asamoah  recently in an interview when he said:” now I just want to play well at Udinese,  do not consider the thing.” But” Turin sports newspaper”  said:” obviously, Nike Tiempo Legend IV Elite Asamoah  again Pozzo in the summer is a tool to make money. Nike Mercurial Vapor VIII” At  present, Asamoah worth around 13000000euros. At the same time, before”  Rome sports newspaper”Nike Mercurial Vapor VII reported that  Juventus scout on week appeared in the Standford bridge, the goal is to  midfield, Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly III in addition to visit Gaitan, Rodrigo and other young players, Chelsea  midfielder Meireles is also one of the main objectives of the Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly III  Safari Juventus team, even to the 29 year old Portuguese  midfielder to pay 12000000 euros transfer fee.  In the active  introduction of some major suit Juventus midfielder, adidas adipower Predator SL TRX and also to remove some of the team does not require the player, which paznza  is likely to be a permanent move to Udinese, adidas adipure IV TRX the former Napoli  player has not received Conti’s reuse in winter, hysteria was loaned out to  Udinese, adidas adipure 11Pro SL TRX but in the next season, paznza opportunities will be less and less, exit would  be his only way out, adidas adipure 11Pro XTRX in addition  the season out on loan to Philip – Melo has no plans to return to Turin, he  told the Turkey media interview said:” adidas F50 adizero TRX I don’t want to  go back to Juventus, everything is fine with me here. adidas F50 adizero” At the same time,  Krasic will certainly leave the club in the summer, adidas F50 adizero TRX Pro he will  choose to go to Tottenham or back to the Russian league, he recently on”  the market” said:” in the winter in the team is a mistake, Adidas F50+ Adizero TRX I had the  opportunity to join the Zenit team, but I want to stay here to prove myself,  but I think I the idea was wrong, Adidas F50 adizero prime I even have  no chance to play.” Another from the reuse of Holland player Elia will be  in the summer to leave the team, adidas adipure but his ways are very likely  to be loaned out, at present Turkey’s Fenerbahce and Galatasaray wear Cristiano  Ronaldo cleats are on his very interested.  In addition to  midfield in the transformation, in the forward David Beckham  cleats line and Juventus to strengthen the Chongzhongzhi is  heavy, Lionel Messi  cleats currently with Juventus spread over the sex scandal major  suit including Torres, Soccer cleats Suarez, Tevez striker,  Dzeko, Balotelli, Rossi, Nike CTR360  Maestri II Timmy ang so on, although is not particularly large,  especially detailed progress, but in” the market” Nike CTR360  Maestri II eliteassociate editor Marchetti seems to Juventus  this summer will be a major suit striker:” yes, Nike Total90  Laser IV yes, Juventus this summer biggest goal is the  acquisition of a major suit team can score Nike  Mercurial Vapor VII goals forward, not with Piero, they waited  for a major suit striker.”  In the purchase of  some major suit star at the same time, Nike  Mercurial Vapor VIII Juventus will put more targeted more  potential young man. Nike  Mercurial Vapor Superfly III According to French media news  Maxifoot, Juventus have decided the Rennes18midfielder in Gan, Nike  Mercurial Vapor Superfly III Safari Gan is currently in U-19  France national team member, is a very promising young players, Nike Tiempo  Legend IV Elite and before this, Juventus in winter when  purchased by Ajax young player Bowie, Raiola the cloth, called the 93 most  outstanding young adidas  adipower Predator SL TRX players at the same time,” Turin  sports newspaper” adidas  adipure IV TRX confirmed Juventus still in full for the United  Bogeba.

  • Annie

    I really understand wanting to keep the costs down for construction, especially for low income subsidized housing. However, for the development at 28th and Pico, there should be spots for families with more than one car- in LA these days the current truth is each adult in a household most likely needs a car to get to work or look for work- very important when you are low income with a family- or visitors or service people coming to the building. Pico only has metered parking, and 28th is a residential street not equipped for that many more either permanent parkers or visitors. I do think the parking spots are warranted.


Bloom and his colleagues spoke Friday about action the State legislature will be taking to address California’s worsening housing crisis. Photo courtesy of Assemblymember Bloom’s office.

State Legislators Put California’s Housing Crisis in the Crosshairs

At a press conference in San Francisco Friday, state legislators announced their plans to tackle California’s growing housing crisis. As a lack of new housing construction continues to make California unaffordable for all but the wealthiest households, Assemblymembers Phil Ting (D-San Francisco), Cecilia Aguiar-Curry (D-Winters), Richard Bloom (D-Santa Monica), Rob Bonta (D-Oakland), and Kevin Mullin […]

Voter’s Guide: Santa Monica’s Prop. T

Ballot Initiative Proposition T Seeks To Limit Commercial Development in Santa Monica (Between now and the November 4th election, LA Streetsblog will be writing about as many local ballot measures that effect transportation that we can find.  Please email any suggestions to A group of Santa Monica residents known as the Santa Monica Coalition […]

The Climate Imperative of TOD in Santa Monica

One of the sub-rifts I’ve observed within the debates and backlashes against development in Santa Monica reflects the diverging views within environmentally conscience minds about balancing localized and broader impacts. There are people who have advocated for environmental initiatives of various kinds their entire life, who I fundamentally clash with despite also considering myself a […]

They Paved Paradise, Parking In Santa Monica

Parking has been dominating the public policy debate in Santa Monica the past few weeks, ever since the local lobbying group Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City (SMCLC) made transportation consultant Jeffery Tumlin into a target. Unfortunately they subsequently succeeded in having him removed from Santa Monica projects after years of great work with […]