Beverly Hills School District Files New Lawsuit Against Purple Line Subway

Early version of possible Purple Line Subway alignments studied through Beverly Hills. Image via Metro
Early version of possible Purple Line Subway alignments studied through Beverly Hills. Image via Metro

Last Friday the Beverly Hills Unified School District filed a new lawsuit against the Federal Transit Administration and Metro. Beverly Hills entities, primarily led by BHUSD, had previously sued the FTA and Metro to block extending the Purple Line Subway on an alignment that would take the train tunnel deep below Beverly Hills High School. In a 2016 decision that left neither side vindicated, a federal judge ordered Metro to perform additional environmental studies but left in place the overall decision that allows early construction and design work to proceed. According to Metro’s The Source, the FTA and Metro completed the Purple Line’s Supplemental Environmental Impact Studies (SEIS) last December.

Most recently in court, according to the Metropolitan News-Enterprise, after spending “about $10 million” on the lawsuit through August 2017, BHUSD lost an appeal to prevent Metro from contracting with the FTA for the subway project.

According to today’s press release (full text below) BHUSD is seeking an injunction to ensure that FTA and Metro “conduct a proper environmental analysis, evaluate the serious health effects the Project and associated construction next to campus will have on the students, and prohibit the FTA from obligating federal funds to the Project until the agencies have fully complied with federal law.”

Below is the text of the BHUSD press release.

For Immediate Release January 29, 2018

School District Files Federal Lawsuit Against the Federal Transit Administration and Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Beverly Hills, CA – On January 26, 2018, the Beverly Hills Unified School District filed suit against the Federal Transit Administration (the “FTA”) and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“Metro”). The School District alleges that the FTA and Metro violated federal law by conducting a faulty and biased supplemental environmental analysis of the impacts of Metro’s Westside Purple Line Subway Extension Project (the “Project”), which is currently planned to run under the heart of Beverly Hills High School. The School District seeks an injunction requiring the agencies to conduct a proper environmental analysis, evaluate the serious health effects the Project and associated construction next to campus will have on the students, and prohibit the FTA from obligating federal funds to the Project until the agencies have fully complied with federal law.

Metro and FTA were ordered to prepare a supplemental environmental analysis by the Federal District court as a result of a prior lawsuit brought by the School District. On August 12, 2016, the Federal District court ruled that Metro failed to perform a complete analysis of impacts of the construction, including to public health, and ordered Metro to specifically analyze whether a feasible alternative route exists, to evaluate the public health impacts of dust and diesel particulate matter, and to disclose risks associated with methane migration and possible explosion potential under unprotected buildings.

According to the complaint, the November 22, 2017 revised supplemental environmental analysis ignores alternative routes and an alternative staging area for construction farther from the campus, fails to properly analyze health effects and does not adequately address the impacts of constructing subway tunnels running at shallow depths beneath the center of Beverly Hills High School’s campus.

The supplemental environmental analysis is written to justify actions already taken by the Agencies and to reaffirm the decision to undertake substantial construction, boring, staging for subway construction and excavation at the former AAA Insurance building site located at the westerly fence of the High School where the District has placed temporary portable classrooms for students during the District’s modernization of the High School campus.

In its lawsuit, the School District challenges the legal sufficiency of the FTA’s and Metro’s environmental analysis. The School District argues that Metro’s planned tunnels will threaten the High School’s recreational areas, its historic structures, and its ability to modernize and expand. According to the School District, airborne dust and emissions from the anticipated seven (7) years of construction at the westerly fence of the High School will threaten the health of students, faculty, staff, and community members that use the High School’s facilities. It also asserts that noise and vibration from construction activity will disrupt the learning environment and education of the over 1500 Beverly Hills High School students. Much of this harm, the School District contends, can be avoided by relocating construction activity and making a slight change to the subway tunnels’ alignment.

According to Lisa Korbatov, President of the BHUSD Board of Education, “This lawsuit is critical to protect Beverly Hills High School, its students, and the community. The FTA’s and Metro’s decision to build subway tunnels beneath the heart of our High School’s campus and to conduct substantial construction activity on the westerly fence line of the High School campus, which faces the walls of classrooms, endangers the health and education of our students. It also puts at risk the High School’s historic buildings, its present and planned recreational facilities, and its ability to expand to meet the needs of Beverly Hills’ growing community.”

The School District’s lawyer, Jennifer S. Recine, a partner at Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, stated: “The supplemental environmental analysis does not fairly or adequately evaluate the Project’s potential harm to the High School or the health and safety of students. The agencies failed to properly consider and adopt reasonable alternatives to the alignment under the High School and the staging area next to the High School, which is contrary to federal law.”

Metro spokesperson Dave Sotero shared a brief Metro response to the new lawsuit:

Metro is confident that the supplemental environmental work for the tunnel alignment in Beverly Hills and the Century City/Constellation station meets all legal requirements. This additional analysis confirms that Metro can safely build the project, including the portion beneath Beverly Hills High School. Metro is committed to delivering the project on time and on budget. Construction of the first subway section between Koreatown and La Cienega in Beverly Hills is well underway. Metro is already conducting design and pre-construction work for Section 2 through Beverly Hills and Century City. We anticipate breaking ground this spring. Metro is working cooperatively with the City of Beverly Hills on a weekly basis to deliver this critically important transit project to all taxpayers of Los Angeles County.

Metro Purple Line (extension phase 1) construction underway at Wilshire and Fairfax. Photo via Metro's The Source
Metro Purple Line (extension phase 1) construction underway at Wilshire and Fairfax. Photo via Metro’s The Source
  • Jason

    As an LA County taxpayer can I sue the Beverly Hills School District for continuing to waste their tax money for the purpose of wasting mine?

  • Does Beverly Hills High School still have an oil well on campus?

  • D G Spencer Ludgate

    Yes it does. Ironic, isn’t it?


    That’s insane


    This lawsuit is a prime example of why we need to reform the land use process.

    Subway routing should be shaped by the transit needs of the general public, not by the the temporary adverse impacts on individuals, businesses, or even high schools.

  • neroden

    The BHUSD school board are the absolute worst sort of people. Hopefully Metro will be able to get this lawsuit declared frivolous and slap them with fines for frivolous lawsuits.

    Better yet, the state should pass a law to dissolve the school district and force them into the LA School District. There’s no legitimate reason to have a rich private enclave with its own school district.

  • love_me_do

    Do we know which judge they pulled?

  • Allan Cameron

    What is insane, is the multi billion dollar waste of money on obsolete subways. For the cost of just this short line, hundreds of thousands of electric buses that would serve all of LA County could have been purchased. Anyone want to be on of these subways when the “big one” hits? Beverly Hills is absolutely correct about this. GO NORMANS

  • Bob

    Subways don’t clog up in traffic unlike buses, the problem with buses are the reduced capacity and the high amount of chance they’ll get stuck in traffic, subways although more expensive have little to no delay problems than having a bunch of buses stuck in traffic, the capacity of subways are also much higher than a bus. Also the Mexico Subway had no real major problems with the earthquake there and according to this Reddit discussion you should be pretty alright when dealing with an earthquake. Basically all your arguments are false, obsolete subways? If they were obsolete China wouldn’t be building a shit ton of them and expanding them, we also wouldn’t have most of the world Megacities with one or building one. Yes the expansion is small but LA isn’t known for it’s renown Public Transport.


Preliminary Federal Ruling Sides With Beverly Hills Against Metro Subway

Last week, United States District Judge George Wu issued a ruling [PDF] in Beverly Hills’ legal battles against Metro’s plans to tunnel the Purple Line subway beneath Beverly Hills High School. The Beverly Hills Courier portrayed the ruling as a victory for Beverly Hills in that Judge Wu chided subway proponents for “not properly considering the environmental effects […]

Today’s Beverly Hills vs. Metro Subway Court Hearing Inconclusive

At a federal court hearing this morning, attorneys for Beverly Hills and Metro clashed, but did not arrive at any conclusive outcome. It appears that Metro will likely need to do some additional environmental review (a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement or SEIS) before proceeding with construction on phase 2 of the Purple Line Subway extension, which […]