New Protected Bike Lanes on Foothill Blvd in Sunland-Tujunga

LADOT recently installed protected bike lanes on Foothill Boulevard in Sunland-Tujunga. Photos by Joe Linton/Streetsblog L.A.
LADOT recently installed protected bike lanes on Foothill Boulevard in Sunland-Tujunga. Photos by Joe Linton/Streetsblog L.A.

In early April, LADOT added protected bike lanes to a 0.7-mile stretch of Foothill Boulevard in the Sunland neighborhood of the city of Los Angeles. The protected lanes extend from the Tujunga Wash bridge (just west of Wentworth Street) to Sunland Boulevard. The project closed a gap between existing bike lanes on Sunland Boulevard and on Foothill Boulevard.

Tucked among the San Gabriel and Verdugo foothills at the northern end of the San Fernando Valley, much of the Sunland-Tujunga community is among the most rural parts of the city of Los Angeles. In this area, Foothill Boulevard is a fairly quiet road connecting Sunland to the adjacent Lake View Terrace neighborhood, which is even less population-dense. Zach Rynew, of CiclaValley and the L.A. County Bicycle Coalition, suggests that the Foothill bike lanes are “low hanging fruit… because there is virtually no traffic congestion out there.”

A ghost bike memorializes cyclist Jeff Knopp killed by a truck on this stretch in 2016
The new Foothill Boulevard protected bike lane goes past the ghost bike memorializing cyclist Jeff Knopp who was killed by a truck here in 2016

LADOT spokesperson Russell Hassan confirmed that the new bikeway was a Vision Zero initiative in response to the 2016 crash that killed Jeff Knopp. On November 1, 2016, Knopp was bicycling up Foothill Boulevard just east of Wentworth, when a truck crashed into him from behind, killing him. According to Hassan, the incident highlighted several safety issues there, including speeding, lack of an adequate shoulder, and a history of collisions in the area – with two other fatalities since 2005. In addition, adjacent portions of Foothill and Sunland Blvds are on the Vision Zero High Injury Network.

Only a month old, Foothill’s protected lanes are no stranger to controversy. According to The Foothill Paper (article posted at the Sunland-Tujunga Safe Streets Facebook group), after the protected bikeway was installed “all hell broke loose” and people let loose on social media “detailing their anger about the local street changes.” The article, written by Alejandro Magallanes, goes on to describe a Sunland-Tujunga Neighborhood Council safe streets forum where Jennifer Knopp, the fallen cyclist’s widow, spoke:

Looking into the eyes of a woman who lost her husband in a traffic collision is a sobering feeling. All of the online bashing dissipates. Reality sets in. I remind all of you reading this that Vision Zero’s goal is to eliminate all citywide traffic deaths by 2025. Zero traffic deaths by 2025. Stay the course. Hold the line. We’ll get there.

Responding to the community concerns, LADOT made changes to the facility, removing some bollards at Wentworth (for turning buses) and along Sunland Park (to allow for on-street parking accessing the park.) In response to concerns raised about emergency response vehicles, LADOT clarified that drivers can pull over along or in the bike lanes when an emergency vehicle needs to pass.

The bikeway controversy reared its head in an April 18 debate between City Council District 7 runoff candidates Karo Torossian and Monica Rodriguez. A question (see video starting at 1:00:40) submitted by the audience read:

The bollards and bike lane enforcement on Foothill and Sunland Boulevard is [sic] a traffic disaster. Will you reverse and remove them?

Though neither candidate promised to remove the bikeway, the candidate responses are instructive.

Karo Torossian was critical of the process, describing the protected bike lanes as “rammed down our throats” with no meeting or fliering. In a windshield-oriented response, the candidate stated:

Any time that our lanes are being taken away for bike lanes, we need to have a public meeting where the people who own those lanes – everyone in this room – can come together and discuss the alternatives.

Candidate Torossian further went on to criticize the protected bike lanes on Van Nuys Boulevard and ones proposed for Lankershim Boulevard. Torossian later posted a Facebook video where he is standing on the San Fernando Road bike path saying that he generally does not support “taking away lanes” for “paint on the ground” bike lanes, but favors taking longer to create “Class A bike lanes [sic – the facility is a Class I bike path] separated from the roadway” that are safe for kids and anyone aged from 8 to 80.

Monica Rodriguez’ debate response focused on the speeding problem on Foothill Boulevard, and the need for Vision Zero. She stated that “at one point we were facing a death every month along Foothill Boulevard” and went on to stress the need for LAPD enforcement against speeding drivers, slowing down traffic, and making sure “everybody is protected and safe.” She thanked the Neighborhood Council for championing street safety.

Foothill’s protected bikeway is the sixth protected bike lane in the city of four million.

Posts protect the bike lane as it veers right off of Sunland Boulevard onto Foothill
Posts protect the bike lane as it veers right off of Sunland Boulevard onto Foothill
In some merge zones, the Foothill Boulevard protected bikeway becomes a buffered or dashed bike lane
In some merge zones, the Foothill Boulevard protected bikeway becomes a buffered or dashed bike lane
  • Chris Shaw

    This is located right across my street…….the City took away a car lane in both directions on Foothill Blvd. and made Bicycle lanes……ZERO Bikes use these lanes and now Grid Lock for the Automobiles (Working Class)……..

  • These are buffered, not protected. Also, the vehicle counts for the street would have helped this article.

  • Doug Moore

    Glad to see these bike lanes! More bikes coming, they need their own space on the road.

  • Kimberly Harris

    I wonder why bikes don’t take safer routes.

  • Patti DLC

    I can see the need for these lanes. We’ve lived here over 35 years and traffic in the last two or three has become life threatening even if you’re in a car. Passing on the right shoulder and cutting back into traffic lanes the split second (or before) the light changes just to be first. Speeding and passing by using even the lanes for oncoming traffic because 50 or 60 is the “new” speed limit on foothill and even the neighborhood side streets. Stop signs…ha, those don’t mean anything to some. I wish we had the space to put those cement “T rails’ for bikes. You definitely take your chances when venturing out onto any roads around here on a bike. We should all slow down and SHARE THE ROAD!

  • hondo77

    I used the lanes this morning and yesterday evening and have been using them since they were created (and long before then). I ride during commuting rush hour and have observed ZERO grid lock or traffic jams for cars in this area. None.

  • hondo77

    This is the safest route from Sylmar to Tujunga.

  • Kimberly Harris

    It took me four traffic signals to make a left from Foothill onto Fenwick towards the freeway. The oncoming traffic was backed up for a couple of blocks. This was at 8:15am. Before the bike lanes, I would have to wait for one or two cars ahead of me and make the first signal every time. It has been this way since the bike lanes. I have not seen a bike using the lanes either. I use that route from the freeway to North Sunland all the time, and often use Foothill toward the golf course to Wentworth.

  • hondo77

    I was there on my bike at 7:45 this morning. No jam or backup in either direction.

  • Kimberly Harris

    7:45 is a little earlier than school traffic, and the rush that happens for people who need to get to work by 9am. It is much worse a little later. Of course there was no traffic in the bike lanes, only you! :)

  • Yolanda

    a person lost their life. That makes these necessary. No meeting needed. Done

  • Tyler Durden

    Get those kids on bikes and you’ve solved the issue ;)

  • Glenn

    Typical a$$ response. Grow up and care a little more for your fellow human being.

  • ben franklin

    Ms Harris: Perhaps you should consider leaving for where ever you are going in such a !@#$ing hurry about two minutes earlier.
    We all know you are in such a hurry to get to Foothill Blvd or Wentworth St. where the 50mph speed limit is much too slow for people like you.

  • ben franklin

    Also, I ask what is wrong with kids walking to school.

  • ben franklin

    Just because you have observed no bicycles DOES NOT MEAN PEOPLE ARE NOT USING THE BIKE LANES!
    Please, stop looking at your “smart” phone.

  • Kimberly Harris

    Dear Ben Franklin – or whatever troll you are – afraid to use your real name? I leave in plenty of time. I don’t speed. I have to drive to Santa Monica. I don’t see how creating a one and a half lane bike lane is justified. In fact, it is ridiculous. Roads were made for cars, not for bikes. Trying to mix bikes into traffic is a dangerous idea, no matter how much room they have. They should be taking side streets and wide streets not trying to force cars off the road on high traffic roads.

  • Lorenzo Mutia

    A bike lane to protect vulnerable riders and yes, slow down overspeeders, is surely not too much of a price to pay to accommodate everyone on the road safely.

  • Kimberly Harris

    I agree with that one.

  • Kimberly Harris

    There is no reason to be rude to me.

  • Victor Hugo Cuevas

    Driving to Santa Monica and not expecting any sort of traffic is mind-blowing, when you have the Metrolink right over the hills in Sun Valley, or the Commuter Express bus that stops on Foothill by Sunland Park.

  • Kimberly Harris

    I really find bike advocates to be a rude bunch in general.

  • Joe Commuter

    The people that comment on streetsblog anyway are being incredibly rude. It’s ok to have disagreements but the people on this thread are being immature and inconsiderate toward you.

    For the record, I support these lanes but I’ve never been to the area- I just think more bike lanes are a good idea, even if they cause some traffic. That said I can imagine it will take time for people to get used to this arrangement.

  • Kimberly Harris

    Thanks, Joe. Don’t know why I bother. I am all for bike lanes – implemented sensibly. Thanks for your kindness.

  • ben franklin

    What, exactly, did I say that was ^&*$ing rude and offended you?

  • ben franklin

    What “one and a half bike lane” are you speaking of? I see one lane in each direction on Foothill Blvd coming into Sunland. Also, the single car lane in each direction is more than enough to handle normal traffic coming into Sunland.

    Why don’t you simply get on the 210 freeway at #11 entrance like most people who drive for two+ hours each day to the beach? If you don’t like that, you are welcome to speed down Sunland Blvd with its four lanes of 45mph speed limit and equestrian trail adjacent.

    They are no side streets from Lake View Terrace into Sunland, in case you did not know that.

  • ben franklin

    ZERO bikes use the lane? Now gridlock?
    Sir/Mam, no offense but you are a liar.
    Please stop your histronics.

  • Vince

    I have lived in Sunland for 4 years and taken that route home every M-F for those 4 years. I haven’t seen 1 bike in all of that time. My opinion is that it’s ridiculous to take out a lane that will undoubtedly increase traffic for the few (if any) bikers.

  • Maya Keller

    Thanks to these bike lanes on Foothills Blvd I can now (somewhat) safely bike to work regularly. That means one less car on the road crowding your commute and polluting the air you breathe.
    Thank you for sharing the road with bicyclists!

  • Pat Kramer

    Removal of one of two lanes on a major highway – yes, Foothill Boulevard is classified as a major highway, is irrational, unsafe, and a public safety hazard for all of our stakeholders. If there is a way to support a bike path without disrupting the normal traffic for those who used to enjoy a lack of traffic in our lovely town of Sunland, then okay, let’s add it to the road. But at the expense that we are now paying – not smart, and definitely reflects a lazy approach by DOT to solving speeding problems. Come on DOT, you can surely come up with a much more logical and well planned strategy than taking away one of two lanes on a main road, can’t you?

  • N.S.

    The residents who live closest to this can now pull out safely from their driveways and side streets. Delivery personnel can now safely stop their vehicles, get out and not risk being hit from behind. There are other paths to use if the time you leave is too jammed up. An extra 5 mins or so over the safety of community neighbors is okay with me. Not only did a cyclist die, a young man died when his vehicle flipped after hitting another head on. Speed was a factor. This slows it down.


Route 66 As A Complete Street? Claremont Is Planning On It

Immortalized by John Steinbeck as “The Mother Road,” the decommissioned Route 66, now known as Foothill Boulevard in East Los Angeles cities La Verne and Claremont, often draws nostalgic visions of America’s golden age of the automobiles. First established in 1926, Route 66’s creation marked the development of transcontinental highway systems in mid-century America. As […]

Looking into Los Angeles’ 2010 Draft Bike Plan

The new draft 2010 City of Los Angeles Bike Plan was released on Friday June 18th 2010. The draft is available online at That website is also where interested parties can sign-up for bike plan webinars tonight at 6pm and 7:30pm. At tonight’s webinars, the city will explain the already-released 2010 draft and will release a new piece: its 5-year implementation […]