Muddled L.A. Sidewalk Repair Hearing Inconclusive On How To Proceed

Broken sidewalk on Alameda Street in downtown Los Angeles. Photo: Roger Rudick
Broken sidewalk on Alameda Street in downtown Los Angeles. Photo: Roger Rudick

As previewed last week, the Los Angeles City Council’s Public Works and Budget Committees held a joint meeting yesterday to discuss and decide on the future of repairing L.A. City sidewalks. In settling the Willits vs. City of Los Angeles lawsuit, the city is committing to spend $1.4 billion – over the next 30 years – to fix tree-damaged sidewalks.

Here are some observations from yesterday’s #LASidewalks hearing:

1. Nothing is happening fast here

Do not expect your local damaged sidewalk to be fixed tomorrow. The outline of the settlement has been decided, but the details are still very much in flux.

After three hours, the only actions to come out of yesterday’s hearing were instructions to city staff to report back – on a number of parameters: a proposed sidewalk prioritization scheme, a possible cap on per-parcel costs, alternate materials, workforce development, and what resources would be needed for environmental review.

Even when the settlement and work plan are finalized, the city will have a one-year period to prepare for the program – but that clock is not even ticking yet.

2. Many Issues Still To Be Decided 

Though the City Administrative Officer (CAO) was requesting the council decide twenty-four specific decision points (see staff report [PDF]), none were actually decided. No votes were taken. Councilmembers appear to be split on a number of issues:

  • Funding: Though the city has committed to $1.4 billion, it is not clear where the funding comes from. Theoretically, this could be pushed back to future budget discussions.
  • Residential vs. commercial property: The CAO “fix and release” proposal would only pertain to residential sidewalks. This “residential” is not just where people live, but it would be the city Bureau of Sanitation’s trash-service definition of residential property, which basically means single family homes and up to fourplexes. Apartment buildings and condos would not be residential, but commercial. Many councilmembers expressed interest in including both commercial and residential sidewalks, but opening up a repair program more widely could create a situation where there is not enough funding to go around, hence potentially triggering greater needs for prioritization and managing a request queue.
  • Using Incentives: Especially for commercial property, councilmembers expressed interest in leveraging city funding in the form of matching homeowner funding. The city might offer, for example, a 50/50 match for commercial property repairs. City funding would pay for half (or some undetermined percentage) and owners would pay the rest. Past match programs tended to favor richer communities, so there might need to be some sort of means test to accompany this sort of program.
  • Capping parcel expenses: The cost of sidewalk repair varies a lot, depending on the extent of damage, and the length and width, and other factors. One example that was repeatedly mentioned was that commercial sidewalks in parts of downtown Los Angeles are structural roofs over underground rooms and repairing those types of sidewalks would cost orders of magnitude more than typical sidewalks on top of soil. Creating some sort of cap, a maximum city cost for repairs for any given parcel, could ensure that repairs are distributed broadly around the city.
  • How to handle sidewalks that are neither city nor private: There are various governmental entities responsible for repairing their own sidewalks, for example: schools, federal courts, public universities, etc. Theoretically, the city of L.A. is responsible for citing these entities to get them to repair sidewalks, but, to date, the city hasn’t inspected or cited other jurisdictions. Some councilmembers urged leniency for other cash-strapped agencies like LAUSD.
  • Inventory: Though livability advocates are pushing for an inventory of city sidewalks, which the city estimates would cost around $10 million, there is no clear consensus for this on the council. There is not even a central tracking system for broken sidewalks. Various city agencies maintain lists: 211, City Attorney, Bureau of Street Services, and various council offices. For repairs to proceed, the city needs to determine how it will track sidewalk conditions, requests, and projects.
  • Environmental Impact Report: For a 30 year $1.4 billion project, the city is anticipating the need to perform environmental studies (EIR – environmental impact report) required under California environmental law (CEQA – California Environmental Quality Act.) Though this was recommended by the CAO, it is not a go just yet. Councilmembers were requesting that sidewalk repair work get underway while the EIR is being prepared.
  • Impacts to Trees, Water, and Environment: Speaking of environmental impacts, there were a lot of concerns raised about impacts to tree canopy, rainwater runoff, drought, climate, etc. Various councilmembers urged the use of alternative materials, green infrastructure, tree preservation, modified tree well standards, etc. Though it makes a lot of sense to address these concerns during sidewalk repair projects, it is unclear where any additional funding would come from.
  • Equity: Broadly, enforcing property owner responsibility for the cost of fixing and maintaining sidewalks is likely to be less successful in neighborhoods with less resources. Though there was a lot of rhetoric about looking out for the poor church vs. the luxury condo building, there was very little in the way of programmatic features to ensure equity. Ultimately the only proposals were that city staff determine how to include local and small businesses incentives in contracting sidewalk repair work.

3. Clarifying Points Of Confusion 

There were still many council questions about what the settlement funding can be spent on:

  • Can funds add sidewalks on streets where there are none? No.
  • Can funds fix public stairways? No.
  • Can the city fix its own sidewalks around city parking lots? Yes, but actually there is already another budget item for that, with repair work underway.
  • If sidewalks are broken, but not so bad, do they really need to be fixed? Yes, especially for city property. There are very specific ADA standards: for example a quarter-inch vertical gap or a half-inch horizontal gap qualify as a failed sidewalk.
  • M

    I can’t help but to read this and still feel utterly hopeless and pretty much confirm that there’s no way these people use the sidewalks and truely understand the problem. Last week I sprained my ankle on some of the messed up sidewalks on Alameda (across the street from where I saw a guy in a wheelchair FALL out of it when trying to cross screwed up sidewalks.) And they still are not even going to add sidewalks (despite the fact that they are missing on streets with RIDICULOUS traffic…. ex: Ventura Blvd. or next to schools that are near freeways. Really?)

  • neroden

    Establish a system of sidewalk districts with sidewalk fees assessed to property owners, going into restricted funds dedicated to sidewalks in that district. When there’s money in the fund, use it to fix the sidewalks in that district.

    This is what Ithaca, NY did recently. You’ll have ALL your sidewalks fixed in about 10 years.

  • neroden

    Apparently the procedure is:
    (1) report the damaged sidewalk location to the city the first time you see it.
    (2) sue the city for damages whenever you’re injured at that location.

    The city will just pay up — they have to. Perhaps enough liability lawsuits will get them to recognize that sidewalk repairs are actually important?

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

This Week In Livable Streets

|
It’s a holiday-shortened week (SBLA won’t be publishing this Friday), but there are some rides and a special L.A. City Council hearing on sidewalk repair. Tuesday 6/30 – At special South L.A. joint meeting of the Public Works and Budget committees [agenda PDF], the Los Angeles City Council will hear from the public on who will pay […]

Eyes on the Street: Some L.A. City Sidewalk Repairs On the Way

|
The city of Los Angeles has a $27 million set aside for sidewalk repair during the current fiscal year, which ends June 30. This is only the proverbial drop-in-the-bucket for L.A.’s estimated $1.5 billion in overall unmet sidewalk repair needs. Based on liability and property concerns, the city is only spending its $27 million repairing […]

L.A. City’s Ten Million Dollar Sidewalk Repair Program Turns Inward

|
At Monday’s Los Angeles City Council Budget and Finance Committee, the city’s proposed $10 million sidewalk repair program took a turn inward. After closed session deliberations over sidewalk lawsuit liability, Committee Chair Paul Krekorian relayed the committee’s action to focus on “damaged sidewalks abutting city facilities.” According to city estimates, L.A. has a $1.5 billion […]