Two Metro Service Changes That Did Happen This Month…

Although most of the service changes slated for implementation in December were suspended, two  were implemented without much fanfare this month.

One change at Metro can impact everything else. Photo:##http://wn.com/Glendale_Transit_Center##wn.com##

The first is a new shuttle between East L.A. College and the Metro Gold Line Indiana Station along Atlantic Boulevard and 1st Street which began January 11th. This new line is in response to concerns expressed by eastside residents that I wrote about previously. John McCready in comments on The Source asks “Of ALL changes that have ever been made to MTA bus lines, how many were ever made by ACTUAL RIDERS that GOT IMPLEMENTED?” (capitalization in the original). Well, Mr. McCready here is an example of rider input resulting in new service.

Meanwhile it was political influence that led line 201 to be re-extended to serve Glenoaks Park as of January 9th. The whole history can be viewed on the Kymbereligh Richards’ Transit Insider website.  The ridership to Glenoaks Park was and continues to be pitiful. Richards notes the 201 when it served the Park through 2006 had a ridership of “9 per day to/from the final Glenoaks Park stop.”

Glendale Beeline started a replacement service (Route 13) when Metro cut back the 201 in Dec. 2006. By the following August, Beeline had reduced this to two round trips in morning and afternoon peak hours and one round trip at the noon hour, weekdays only.  Ridership continued to be so poor they sought to discontinue the route.

Maybe the 9 Glenoaks Park riders threw a snit to their local electeds. Nothing else explains why political pressure was applied to have the 201 re-extension occur, even though by every measure the segment has virtually no ridership demand. Metro’s service change hold forced the Beeline to continue operating its route 13 after they had announced it was cancelled and replaced with the 201. But now that Metro has extended the route 201 Beeline have not only discontinued Route 13 but posted a link to the 201 schedule on their website as the explicit replacement.

All in all a sorry state of affairs.

Did no one speak up against this, you wonder? Well, actually Kymberleigh Richards did at the November meeting of the Westside/Central Service Council.

S*I*G*H

  • David D.

    I’m not sure why there was such resistance to running some 201 service to Glenoaks Park, as has been done for years. The line generally runs with 3 buses on a 50-minute headway, so the extra 9 minutes of revenue service per trip can be completely absorbed into the existing recovery time. Sounds like a win-win for everyone involved.

  • “Sounds like a win-win for everyone involved.”

    Precious funds spent on fuel etc. for 9 passengers A DAY. I also wonder how well the operators can get relief (i.e. purchase a snack of use the restroom) at the park vs. the hospital. The logic espousing that this is a good thing doesn’t hold up. 

  • David D.

    9 passengers is a very low number indeed, but it’s not like every trip on the 201 is going there. If Metro had put back service like it was prior to the Beeline adventure, I’d sing a different tune. As for driver facilities, I haven’t been to Glenoaks Park for years, so I can’t say. However, I’m sure it has more to offer than some of the layover points on routes my agency runs.

  • calwatch

    Actually it does hold up. Sometimes it is best to support taxpaying residents who have received services for decades with a few buses a day – maybe a couple of thousand dollars in service time a year. Your “riders [who] threw a snit to their local electeds” is my example of democracy in action. When the political winds change, it will likely be canceled again, but I support democracy and the right for our elected leaders to review the decisions of unelected bureaucrats.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Metro Proposes More Cuts to Bus System

|
Earlier this week, Metro announced another set of proposed cuts to its bus system.  Following so soon on the cuts from just last month, Metro CEO Art Leahy took to The Source to defend the changes.  Oddly, rather than defend the good work being done by the bus division at Metro and push for the […]
Metro's Transit To Parks Strategic Plan

Metro To Consider Adopting Transit-to-Parks Strategic Plan

|
Note: Metropolitan Shuttle, a leader in bus shuttle rentals, regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog Los Angeles. Unless noted in the story, Metropolitan Shuttle is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content. This Thursday, the Metro board of directors will consider adopting the agency’s first Transit to Parks Strategic Plan. The plan is a response to a […]

Metro’s Conan Cheung Updates on Next 18 Months of Service Planning

|
Metro’s Deputy Executive Officer of Service Planning and Scheduling Conan Cheung made nearly identical updates on service planning at the agency to the November 13th meeting of Southern California Transit Advocates and the November 17th meeting of Metro’s Citizens’ Advisory Council. Those who are unfamiliar with Metro’s practice of semi-annual service changes (known as “shake-ups”) […]