Is New St. Louis Rail Station an Eyesore?
Steve Patterson, the writer of Streetsblog Network member blog UrbanReviewSTL, has long been a fan of anti-sprawl guru James Howard Kunstler.
But Patterson takes issue with Kunstler in a post today about the new
St. Louis Amtrak station, a multimodal facility that also serves as a
bus depot and light rail link. Kunstler just named it as his "eyesore
of the month."
Patterson concedes that the station has
its issues, and no one would argue that it can hold an aesthetic candle
to the city’s magnificent Union Station, which is now a shopping mall with a hotel and restaurants. But he says Kunstler rushed to judgment without all the facts:
So because Union Station is no longer used for rail transit our new
station is a "piece-of-shit." The problem I have is not the criticism
of the new station — a few [points] are correct. The problem is relying on an
account/pictures from a visitor from Chicago. I’m often critical of
projects and places but I always visit in person to see for myself
rather than be potentially misled by a reader.
Kunstler done his homework he would have known it has been more
than 30 years since the last train backed out of Union Station. From
1978–2008, St. Louis’ Amtrak station was in two different portable
buildings (#1 1978–2004, #2 2004–2008). It is not like we stopped
using Union Station one day and [opened] the new station the next.
Our Gateway Station combines Amtrak and Greyhound with our
MetroLink light rail and MetroBus. I’d say that is a good
combination. Utilizing the space under the highway makes sense and
bringing these services together in one spot can help visitors.
of the best things about the Streetsblog Network is that it brings
together on-the-ground observers in more than 40 states and several
nations. If you want to know what’s going on in St. Louis, you can find
someone in St. Louis. Or Reno. Or Savannah. Or Indianapolis. Or any of dozens of communities.
Just click on the map you’ll find here and start exploring for yourself.