City Planners Listen to Stakeholders Regarding Potential for Bike Lanes Along Boyle and Soto

Multi-modal Boyle Heights: A family rides bikes, boys skateboard, and car commuters make their way home. Sahra Sulaiman/Streetsblog LA
Multi-modal Boyle Heights: A family rides bikes, boys skateboard, and car commuters make their way home. Sahra Sulaiman/Streetsblog LA

As I pedaled my way up the hill towards Mariachi Plaza, I had to dodge a skateboarder coming straight at me at a rather significant clip.

It’s not the first time I’ve seen a skateboarder in the middle of the road there.

The eastbound stretch of 1st between Boyle Ave. and Pecan St. is quite wide, and the skaters usually turn onto Pecan or hop back onto the sidewalk and out of traffic at the Pecan/1st intersection. The thrill of an unfettered downhill is brief, in other words, but apparently worth the risk of skating against traffic.

That’s who needs special lanes, I thought as I crossed Boyle and picked up the 1st St. bike lane. There are more skaters than bikers, and they need to be able to get around easily, too. 

I was thinking about the possibilities for community-specific road reconfigurations because I was on my way to a roundtable meeting to discuss the possible implementation of bike lanes on Soto St. and Boyle Ave., two of the 19 streets on the 2010 Bike Plan’s Second Year slate of projects. The roundtable, run largely by David Somers of City Planning and LADOT Bikeways Engineer Tim Fremaux, was the city’s first stab at connecting with a few Boyle Heights stakeholders and gathering specific feedback regarding mobility and other issues along those streets.

Screen shot of the 2010 Bike Plan's lanes planned for Soto (from Huntington to 8th) and Boyle (from 5th to 8th).
Screen shot of the 2010 Bike Plan’s lanes planned for Soto (from Huntington to 8th) and Boyle (from 5th to 8th). Click to enlarge.

I was looking forward to hearing other stakeholders’ thoughts on the lanes. Although I didn’t expect any of the participants to offer push-back, I knew they would be aware of the concerns that others in the community might raise when the city looked for support for the project from the wider public.

First among those concerns is the view that bike lanes can act as a gateway drug for gentrification.

When the city comes a-calling in a long-marginalized community and only offers the one thing that is at the bottom of that community’s lengthy list of needs, it’s not unusual for some to be suspicious of the city’s intentions.

The popular “bikes mean business” mantra doesn’t help allay fears, either, as it doesn’t necessarily hold up in lower-income communities. There, bicycles can signify of a lack of resources, and long-standing businesses catering to hyper-local needs are not the ones well-heeled cyclists are likely to favor (see the discussion of the gentri-flyer debacle for more on this).

Another key concern is that Boyle Heights is a largely (bus) transit- and pedestrian-heavy community and that it needs upgrades to its pedestrian and bus infrastructure much more than it needs bike lanes that facilitate connections to rail.

This is not to say there aren’t a lot of cyclists in the area — there are. There is a sizable number of commuters, as well as a growing contingent of youth that regularly ride for both transport and recreation.

But they aren’t as visible a presence as the pedestrians. And it is often economics and community mobility patterns (i.e. moms needing to run errands with a few kids in tow) that keep many reliant on walking, skateboarding, and/or transit, not the lack of bike infrastructure–meaning that the community may be unsure that it would reap any benefits from the presence of the lanes.

Those and other concerns don’t mean the wider community would automatically reject the striping of bike lanes outright. But they could complicate the effort to convince residents that major interventions that would affect traffic flows, such as a “road diet” on sections of Soto, were really necessary.

Participants summarize their small-group discussions about needs along Boyle and Soto Sts. Sahra Sulaiman/Streetsblog LA
Participants from YouthBuild, Multicultural Communities for Mobility, the Ovarian Psycos, and other corners of the community summarize their small-group discussions about needs along Boyle Ave. and Soto St. Sahra Sulaiman/Streetsblog LA

Putting a street like Soto on a “road diet” — reducing travel lanes in order to make way for a middle turn lane and bike lanes — could actually make a street more efficient for all, Somers told the dozen or so participants gathered at Boyle Heights’ city hall.

It certainly would also help calm sections of Soto, we agreed, poring over an enlarged map of the street.

A calmer and more predictable Soto could be an important perk for pedestrians, considering the number of students and families that flood some of its major intersections after school.

And if the city is genuinely up to the task of wrangling tough situations, like the chaos at the off-ramp on Soto (near 8th, below), it could do much to make Soto more manageable for everyone.

Right now, at peak hours, the steady stream of Vernon-bound 18-wheelers exiting the freeway and jostling their way into the middle lanes makes that section of roadway a complete nightmare.

Traffic looking north along Soto at 8th St. Trucks exit the freeway and immediately need to shift lanes in order to continue south to Vernon. Sahra Sulaiman/Streetsblog LA
Traffic looking north along Soto at 8th St. Trucks exit the freeway (below the bridge) and immediately need to shift lanes in order to continue south to Vernon, making that section of Soto very chaotic. Sahra Sulaiman/Streetsblog LA

In discussing these and other hot spots, I think we managed to offer the planners a lot of specific information regarding unsafe intersections (i.e. Soto and Huntington or Marengo), intersections that see a considerable amount of multimodal traffic (i.e. Soto and 4th or 1st), sections of streets that are uncomfortable for biking (i.e. heading up the hill on Soto towards Cesar Chavez or underneath the freeways on Boyle), and common usage patterns.

But, as always, a lot of the concerns we had were interwoven with other issues and/or fell outside the scope of what the city could offer in addition to the lanes: the poor condition of the pavement (hello, massive mogul on Soto just north of 1st) and sidewalks (almost everywhere); the lack of pedestrian lighting; the poor pedestrian infrastructure around off-ramps or other important intersections (i.e. Marengo’s huge curbs and lack of curb cuts); the need to prioritize connectivity to bus transit (not just rail) and better bus stop infrastructure; a reduction in truck traffic;  a need for programming around walking and biking in the area to both activate new lanes and help mitigate some of the community dynamics that limit those forms of mobility; and questions about the possibility of programming to build relationships with businesses so that they could benefit from any bump in cycling traffic.

Both Maryann Aguirre (Ovarian Psycos) and Miguel Ramos (Multicultural Communities for Mobility) also talked about the importance of having staff from other city departments/projects on hand at future meetings to provide specific answers about how and why the implementation of a bike lane might not include pedestrian lighting, for example. The more information people have about how the planning and implementation processes work, they felt, the more it will help both build trust with the wider community and mitigate their expectations.

Those next meetings won’t likely happen until September. Between now and then, the city will be analyzing the feedback they have received from stakeholders, doing a technical study that explores how a bike lane and/or street reconfiguration (in the case of Soto) will impact traffic and safety, and assessing potential design options (see LADOT’s timeline discussion here). If the process goes smoothly, they estimated, implementation of the lanes could happen by summer of next year.

In the meanwhile, I’d like to hear from you.

What are some of the specific issues you come across as a pedestrian, cyclist, transit user, or driver along Boyle or Soto? Are there intersections or sections of roadway you find particularly troublesome to navigate? Are there times of the day that are more problematic than others? What kinds of solutions would you like to see implemented? What would make a bike lane feel like a genuine benefit for the community (i.e. green paint, the incorporation of art, the accommodation of skateboarders, the conversion of underpasses into garden or art spaces, the organization of family rides, etc.)? Would bike lanes make you more likely to bike in Boyle Heights? Let us know your thoughts below or via email (sahra(at)streetsblog(dot)org) or twitter.

  • Salts

    I have no doubt that more people in Boyle Heights would ride bikes if the infrastructure were there. And not little painted lines, actual lanes separated from traffic with their own traffic signals. The road diet, while a proposal to add bike lanes, certainly is not bike centric. The median created benefits cars (and to some degree buses) and offers potential refuge areas for pedestrians crossing. If cycle tracks were put in, it could create bus islands to improve bus times (since they wouldn’t weave back and forth between the curb and traffic, it would simply halt traffic when it picks passengers up or drops them off). Cycle tracks also reduce crossing distance for pedestrians by creating waiting islands further form the curb. Oh, and cycle tracks create space for bikes, an accessible mode of transportation.

  • calwatch

    Soto is a major bus corridor and, as with 7th Street from Downtown east to the Greyhound Station, sometimes reduction in lanes for “traffic calming” can have dramatic disastrous impacts on traffic. Although bike/bus lanes like those on Sunset aren’t the greatest things in the world, they prioritize transit and should be considered. 12-15 buses an hour is enough to give them their own lane in my opinion, and is 50% more than the 7-9 buses an hour on Figueroa where Cedillo is blocking the road diet there.

  • Guest

    I would like to add that when you say the infrastrucure needs to be there, its more than just separated bike lanes with signals. Again, take a clue from Jane Jacobs. People will commute most when the spatial arrangements around them are juxtaposed between primary and secondary uses (like say home and a coffee shop). This requires that our infrastructure also needs to include more dense mixed-use projects. Seriously, if you want more people to actually bike, the need has to be there. Otherwise, you’re just fooling yourself with the majority of bikers just doing it recreationally or professionally. Its gonna take alot more than just bike lanes if you want the mainstream commuters to start biking.

  • Salts

    Yeah, of course the nicer a street is, the more people want to be out and about on it. If a street is a car sewer there’s no reason to care about the adjacent buildings. The street projects values to the buildings that line it. If a street is concerned with moving cars fast in high volumes at the expense of bicycle and pedestrian safety, then the buildings will respond to this. We will have auto-centric businesses in strip malls with huge signage and few architectural details. The sidewalk will be an unpleasant place and there will be no compelling reason to be there.

    And who says a nice road diet or street transformation can’t be a catalyst to transform adjacent businesses and pedestrian realm? Gentrification or not, a street safe for walking and bicycling will attract more walking and bicycling and make the public realm more attractive and safe. It takes years if not decades to undo damage of strip malls, pedestrian hostile design, and parking lots in our communities. Streets, on the other hand, can be transformed relatively quickly and more importantly the city has domain over how they are designed.

  • Salts

    Point of clarification: When I say “It takes decades to undo damage of pedestrian hostile design, strip malls, and parking lots” I am referring to the (mostly) private developments and lots on streets.

    A city can make streets great for walking and biking but a city is more limited in what can be done and when something can be done to transform development patterns.

  • sahra

    I don’t necessarily disagree…both Soto and Central Ave (another on the 2nd year list) are heavy transit routes. I wouldn’t want to argue against bike lanes, but I have genuinely wondered if it is really possible to put a street like Central on a road diet because it is so heavily trafficked, dense with businesses, and has a number of t-intersections which make the flow a bit choppy. But I am not an engineer. That said, if either Soto or Central were given a 24-hour bus-only lane that could be an alternative solution. Because the last thing you want to do in trying to encourage people to get out of their cars is slow down transit…there should be rewards for getting on the bus, too. Something does need to happen on both, but particularly on Central, which has seen a number of hit-and-runs.

  • Elbatmanuel

    I live in BH and ride everyday. A bicycle safe Soto would be wonderful since it’s the only direct route from El Sereno all the way through BH. But even as a veteran rider I always avoid riding on Soto. I’m not sure a road diet alone is enough to make it safe for bikes. The combination of busses, semi trucks, high speed sections, a blind hill, crazy drivers, heavy rush hour traffic and multiple freeway on ramps makes Soto a street that requires more than just green paint to protect cyclists.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Vision Zero 101: Bike Lanes Are Not Parking Spaces

|
Tap tap tap. The parking enforcement officer looked up from his phone. When he rolled down his window, I smiled and asked politely about his having parked in the bike lane on Los Angeles Street. There was a long pause. “And?” he raised his eyebrows. Having only expected some, not total, disdain, I stuttered my […]

Behold the 1st Street Bike Lanes! Now Where Was the Outreach?

|
Bike lanes began to appear in Boyle Heights during November 2011.  It was a joyous celebratory occasion to many cycling advocates who have lobbied city hall for years.  The lobbying is a result of several thousand incidents throughout the city in which cyclists have been involved in automobile traffic collisions.  These incidents have resulted in […]

It Is Easy Being Green…for the 1st Street Bike Lane in Boyle Heights

|
In contrast to the uproar over the repainting of Downtown’s green bike lane; Spring’s sister bike lane  on 1st Street on the Eastside has proven quietly effective, at least according to anecdotal evidence and utterly uncontroversial. In fact, while residents, business owners, safety advocates, pedestrian advocates, bicycling advocates, urban planners, and the Neighborhood Council came ready […]

Report from Last Week’s DTLA Bike Sting

|
On Thursday, March 1, 2012, the LAPD Central Traffic Division deployed eight motorcycle officers to Downtown Los Angeles (DTLA) in what was called a “Bike Lane Sting.”  The LAPD’s mission was to educate and issue traffic citations to motorist, cyclist and pedestrians whose actions infringed on the rules of the road.   The focus was on […]