News from the Summit: Dude, Where’s My Bike Plan?

Bike Advisory Committee Chair Glenn Bailey discusses the most recent update to the Bike Plan

The StreetSummit workshop update on the Draft Bike Plan was very much a good news and bad news sort of event.  On one hand, the newest Draft of the plan looks better than the one released last summer.  On the other hand, after listening to Janette Sadik-Khan and Charlie Gandy rallying the troops earlier in the day; it was a stark reminder of just how far we have to go.

The good news is that the staff from City Planning and the Department of Transportation seem to have picked up something from the Bike Working Group and the Backbone Bikeway Network.  The next draft of the Bike Plan, tentatively scheduled for release early next month, not mid-February as it still says on the Draft Bike Plan website, breaks down all planned improvements into either being part of the Citywide Network or a local network.  Insiders are reporting that the Citywide Network looks awfully similar to the Backbone Bikeway Network, and staff at the summit claimed that the first goal of the new plan is to close the gaps in the Citywide Network in the next three to five years.

The bad news is that while the City of New York plans on striping fifty miles of bike lanes every year, the City of Los Angeles has painted fifty one in the last fourteen.  While the city has designated over one-hundred and thirty four miles of road "bike routes" in the same time, LADOT Senior Bike Coordinator Michelle Mowery admitted that if routes are just streets with tiny green signs, they’re "useless." 

That holds especially true of some of the more narrow streets, and LADOT is actually working to "un-designate" some of those routes, such as stretches of Pico and Olympic Boulevards, to reflect that these streets aren’t the most safe for cyclists.  I’m not sure if this is a sign that either the city was too cavalier in designating some streets bike routes to make the city appear more friendly than it is, or whether it’s a sign that the city really needs to do more to make the existing routes more safe.  Either way, it’s reflective of a sad reality.

The other depressing reality is that all of those exciting changes they’re implementing in New York and planning to implement in New York are in a section called "non-standard design" in the upcoming draft.  Mowery explained that means they’re possible to do, but they’re not planned for anywhere in particular.  "If you want to see these, tell your City Council person to tell us to do it," Mowery encouraged the crowd.  "Non-standard" design?  Maybe in Los Angeles.  I’m wondering if "non-standard designs" are going to become the "proposed but currently infeasible" in the newest draft plan.

So what’s the timeline before all of us in the general public can actually see this plan?  Remember the schedule presented in 2008 that had the plan certified sometime last year?  Well, that’s clearly out.  Then the plan was to have the plan certified by June.  Well, you can scratch that too.  Here’s the newest timeline to get the plan out in the public and before the City Council:

Revised draft to the public in April

Supporting environmental documents completed in May

Two-month public comment period, including two more workshops, April-June

City Planning Commission Hearing in July

In front of the City Council in the "Fall"

Of course, the moment we hear that the newest revised plan is available on the web, we’ll let you know.

3 thoughts on News from the Summit: Dude, Where’s My Bike Plan?

  1. The longer the City screws up the process, the more powerful the eventual body slam will be when we get the changes we’ve been fighting for.

  2. The city garnered a lot of disrespect from me on this issue when they acted so completely dismissive of the backbone network. If they incorporate a lot of this, I really hope they give credit where credit is due. People put a lot of effort into correcting the inefficiencies of the city’s “Draft Plan”.

  3. I too attended this session… and wanted to mention something I found very frustrating – something that brought me crashing back down to the sad negativity that permeates L.A. city’s bikeways staff… just after having been inspired by talks by NYC’s Janette Sadik-Khan and Long Beach’s Charlie Gandy.

    A Los Angeles city staffer (who I am not going to name – but who does know better), when asked about facilities like what NYC is doing, began responding by stating “Non-standard facilities like the ones that New York City is doing and the ones that Long Beach is talking about…”

    To me, it felt like a real low jab at Long Beach – implying that Long Beach’s bike efforts are all talk and no action. Please, LADOT staff – go to 2nd Street in Long Beach and ride and see for yourself. Long Beach has already has already implemented non-standard green sharrow lanes, and a non-standard green bike box. It’s not just talk – these are excellent non-standard facilities. They’re on the ground, in the streets, right now.

    Even if that LADOT staffer was only thinking specifically of protected bike lanes… Long Beach is doing more than “talking about” protected lanes. They’re not on the ground yet, but Long Beach sought and received funding for them. They’re funded! Construction contracts are being awarded for them. To imply that it’s just talk is disrespectful negativity.

    Though I felt frustrated with that comment… overall, at the L.A. Bike Plan session and elsewhere, it looks like City Planning and DOT are making some changes to the draft bike plan that appear to push it in a healthier direction… though it’s difficult to be sure of this before it’s actually released to the public. At that point we’ll be able to review the details… hopefully in April as has been announced…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Looking into Los Angeles’ 2010 Draft Bike Plan

|
The new draft 2010 City of Los Angeles Bike Plan was released on Friday June 18th 2010. The draft is available online at labikeplan.org. That website is also where interested parties can sign-up for bike plan webinars tonight at 6pm and 7:30pm. At tonight’s webinars, the city will explain the already-released 2010 draft and will release a new piece: its 5-year implementation […]

Advocates Love the Backbone Bikeway Network

|
Getting off the Backbone in the Valley. Photo: Fire Monkey Fish/Flickr Since the maps for the Backbone Bikeway Network burst on to the scene last week, it seems that the discussing the maps, the Backbone, and the concepts and theories behind it is all anyone in the cycling movement wants to do.  Following up on […]

More on the Bike Plan: Strength and Weaknesses

|
(As you may have noticed, Streetsblog is running a series gathering different people’s opinions on the Bike Master Plan.  You can read statements by a group of different bike activists from Monday,  Dan Koepel on Tuesday, Kent Strumpell in the comments section yesterday and now LACBC Founder and Green L.A. Transportation Working Group Chair Joe […]

Streets Notes for the Upcoming Bike Plan Meetings

|
I’ll be going to the Westside Meeting.  If anyone wants to write about the other ones, let me know. Starting on Thursday, the City of Los Angeles will hold the first of five "official" public meetings on the Draft Bike Plan that was released for public viewing after some draft maps were released earlier this […]

Light Appears at the End of a Long Bike Plan Tunnel

|
The city of Los Angeles’ update to its 1996 Bicycle Master Plan has been years in the making, and it looks like there’s finally some light appearing at the end of the bike tunnel. City work began in 2007, with an initial round of public meetings in early 2008. Shifting 2009 drafts drew near-universal derision from local […]