Bad News from Governor, Courts on 710 Expansion Near Pasadena

12_17_08_710.jpgYou know what this highway needs? More travel lanes. Photo: Big Mike Lakers/Flickr

Opponents of expanding the I-710 near Pasadena to connect the road to the I-210 received a double dose of bad news in recent weeks from both the courts and our environmental governor.  First, Governor Scwarzenegger, between lecturing his wife about safe driving, found time to veto Senator Gil Cedillo’s legislation that would have required any highway expansion in this area to take the form of a tunnel.  Second, a state court ruled against the lawsuits brought by South Pasadena and La Canada Flintridge against the inclusion of funding for the I-710 expansion in Measure R.

First, let’s check in with our Greenhouse Gas fighting Governor.  Senator Gil Cedillo’s legislation, SB 545, would have required that any expansion of the 710 for the purpose of connecting to the I-210 would have to be below ground.  In addition to saving homes, there was a strong political reason for the legislation; it would have ended a fifty year old dispute between South Pasadena and Alhambra.  Alhambra has been one of the leading communities fighting for the expansion, hoping that the increased freeway would reduce traffic on its surface streets.  South Pasadena is one of the cities strongly opposing the project.

Despite the overwhelming local support for the legislation, the Governor vetoed the legislation saying:

This bill is unnecessary. The project development process currently being undertaken by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority is the appropriate vehicle to determine the scope and feasibility of a project to address the transportation needs in the I-710 corridor. This process provides ample opportunity for public involvement and input. There is absolutely no need to enact statutory restrictions that would mandate certain project design options or remove others from potential consideration.

While I’m sure Metro appreciates the vote of confidence, it should be noted that the transit agency supported SB 545 and sent representatives to Cedillo’s press event celebrating the bill’s passage.  Opponents and proponents of the project both viewed Schwarzenegger’s veto as a bad thing.  Supporters wanted to quell the opposition of South Pasadena and opponents wanted one less thing to worry about.

One last note, neither Schwarzenegger or Cedillo cited the environmental benefits of the massive expansion in their statements.  Perhaps the 2004 report by Environmental Defense that labeled the expansion "one of the dumbest highway projects in the country" is getting through.

Meanwhile, a judge in Santa Barbara dismissed a lawsuit from the cities of South Pasadena and La Canada Flintridge that the inclusion of the 710 expansion in Measure R was illegal because the project did not have a selected route or needed environmental clearances.  The judge ruled that the $780 million set aside for the project did not require Metro to build the project, especially if it never receives the needed clearances.  If the project doesn’t move forward, the $780 million would most likely move to another highway project so it didn’t change the allocation by mode that was part of the compromise that created Measure R.

The rejection of the lawsuit caught officials with the plaintiff cities off guard.  Representatives from South Pasadena testified at last week’s Metro Board meeting, a day before the lawsuit was rejected, that they expected the 710 project to be removed from Measure R’s expenditure plan.

  • JRider

    The I-710 tunnel is not a bad thing. It’s a gaping hole in A SYSTEM. For a relatively small investment on a relatively short freeway segment, we can greatly improve the usefulness of the rest of our freeway system.

    Just as two connected rail lines allows for FOUR times as many trip pairs as one rail line, filling in a gap like this will have benefits far beyond the project area itself.

  • Winston

    Given that L.A.s freeway system is already saturated, one wonders how adding more possible routes will help. It seems to me that this project is just as likely to shuffle congestion around as it is to improve the overall effectiveness of the system. I think it would take some very sophisticated modeling to determine if this link is worthwhile, especially given its high cost.

  • Kill the 710 expantion and put that money towards more trains and subways.

  • limit

    Cut and cover type gap closure. Cheaper than a tunnel with near equal impact to stakeholders. Basically, sub grade the freeway, cover it with a park (with bike lanes and overcrossings), keep city streets, historic homes relocated back to the same spot (with improved park frontage)…

  • Andrew

    This freeway needs to be finished already. The only reason this freeway was not completed years ago is the City of South Pasadena has money. If it were some “poor” city the State would have taken the land and built the freeway 50 years ago.

    Anyone who is opposed to this freeway completion should go sit in rush hour traffic sometime on Fremont Boulevard.

  • The 710 can and should pay for itself, as a congestion priced tunnel. If trucks are banned from the tunnel, the heights can be limited to that of a standard transit bus. The same goes for the proposed Palmdale-La Crescenta tunnel. COngestion pricing the tunnel also allows the tunnel to be sized smaller, say at two or three lanes in each direction instead of four.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Divide and Conquer on the 710 Big Dig

|
Last week, Metro finished its most recent public meetings outlining twelve proposals to fill the so-called 4.5 mile “gap” on the I-710 between Alhambra and Pasadena at the I-210. The public response to the twelve alternatives presented was near-uniformly negative. Anger was particularly high at new proposals to connect the I-710 to the I-210 including, a […]
STREETSBLOG CALIFORNIA

PIRG: Proposed 710 Freight Highway Tunnel Among Country’s Worst Projects

|
Yesterday, the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), a national non-profit with state chapters throughout the country, released a report detailing the “12 biggest highway boondoggles” under study in the country. Not surprisingly, a California highway project made the list, the I-710 Tunnel Project in Los Angeles County. PIRG explains the project. San Gabriel Valley Route […]

Language Matters: Mind the Gap

|
As long time Streetsblog readers are well aware, our editorial team believes that language matters.  It’s why there’s a slew of stories arguing that using the word “accident” as a synonym for “crash” is both incorrect and insidious.  Last week, a reader pointed out to me that Metro, in both press materials and on The […]