Sides Agree Wyvernwood Living Conditions Intolerable, Divided on “Right” Solution

Speakers line up to comment during a public hearing about the proposed Wyverwood mixed use project. More than 300 people were in a attendance, with a majority making up supporters for the project. Kris Fortin/LAStreetsblog

Maria Mendez, a Wyvernwood resident, has asked for improvements at the Wyvernwood Apartments, saying she takes the bus to wash her clothes instead of using the washrooms at the complex.

“I’ve asked for things to be renovated, I have not received a response,” said Mendez in Spanish through a translator. Fed up with the conditions, she said she decided to support the $2 billion Wyvernwood mixed-use redevelopment project because it would give her family “a better living.”

The poor living conditions and the lack of response from the landowner, 15 Group, was the singular commonality at the contentious Wyvernwood public hearing for the release of the final environmental impact report. Yet, choosing between redevelopment or preservation and renovation has caused the greatest division. Some are wary 15 Group won’t keep it’s word when it redevelops and will displace its residents, while others trust that they will get the better quality housing that is being promised to them.

“The idea and the vision for Wyvernwood is that the folks that live there today, will live there tomorrow as well,” said Mark Sanders, principal and cofounder of 15 group. 15 group is also the developer for the redevelopment project.

Opponents and supporters at last week’s public hearing flooded City Hall’s 10th floor. More than 300 residents, advocates, and city officials filled the main room, three overflow rooms and into the hallways.

The meeting followed similar themes as in past meetings, except the support in favor of the development was in greater numbers.  The main room where the panel was located was filled with a sea of yellow shirts that supported the redevelopment. Representatives from community groups including Homeboy Industries, Jovenes Inc, Resurrection Church, and national organizations such as the Congress for New Urbanism came to give their endorsement to the project.


The 69 acres up for grabs that has been vehemently contested took another step toward a decision by the City Planning Commission, before a final vote by the City Council. The proposed project would include up to 4,400 residential units with at least 1,200 rental units, 3,200 condominium units, and 325,000 square feet of neighborhood-serving retail, office, and civic uses.

15 Group’s resident retention plan would give current residents priority to buy or rent from the 660 affordable housing units, or keep the rent they paid from the apartments. The Boyle Heights Jobs Collaborative, a partnership with community groups and 15 Group, would have hiring for the project be done in Boyle Heights, Sanders said.  Last Monday, 15 group signed a project labor agreement with the Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, which has 140,000 members from 52 unions.

“We want to ensure that no injustice is done to that community there, and we feel that the only way to do that is to be a part of the new Wyvernwood project and be in support of it, and be a part of the jobs collaborative,” said Jose Osuna, director of employment services for Homeboy Industries.

Osuna acknowledged that the change from the development seemed inevitable, and didn’t want the neighborhood residents to feel helpless in negotiating local jobs when shovel met the dirt on the development.

The redevelopment would also change the street network, creating a connection from north to south on multiple points, as apposed to the limited connections to main streets. A north-south connection existed before Wyvernwood Apartments were built into a garden-style complex, Sanders said, so all the developer is doing is going back to an even older street design.

The opposition argues that Wyvernwood should be rehabilitated and maintains its rent-restricted housing, said Jose Fernandez, East Los Angeles Community Corporation organizer and a 22-year Wyvernwood resident.

“(It’s) being presented as new urbanism, but the reality is new urbanism puts low income, working class people of color at a disadvantage, and that makes up a majority of the Boyle Heights community,” said Ferndandez.

According to the Final EIR, rehabilitation, whether full or partial, is infeasible because it would drive up rents to at least $2,700.

ELACC, which presented its recommendations to the Deputy Advisory Agency / Zoning Administrator committee calls for a complete rejection of the current project proposal.

“It’s been really strange like living here my whole life and watching the weird division between the people that are for and against it,” said 21-year-old Wendy Puquirre, a Wyvernwood resident and Comite de Esperanza supporter.

Puquirre says that it was true to say that the current apartments don’t accommodate modern needs, but 15 Group hasn’t aided tenants with the problems that they have asked them to solve.

“As tenants we expect them to serve us. If we have a need they don’t help us,” said Puquirre.

“They are cornering us into this very suffocating living environment.”

(Click here for 15 Group’s presentation to the committee last week)

(Click here for ELACC’s statement of opposition and recommendations for the site)

  • A good follow-up piece would be investigating why the nonprofit groups are on different side of the aisle on this issue AND why the city isn’t pursuing any action against 15 Group’s mismanagement of the housing site.

  • Amyneal2

    Thank you for an accurate report on last week’s public hearing. However, of all the comments pro and con offered at the hearing, it is disappointing that the author included Mr. Fernandez’s remark that “‘new urbanism’ puts low income, working class people of color at a disadvantage.” Not only was Mr. Fernandez alone among the speakers making such a claim, but his assertion was not backed up by any examples or evidence. Indeed, just the opposite is true.

    There is no single, urban planning movement, or set of philosophies, that has done more to create safe, attractive, and desirable communities for working people, and very low-income families than New Urbansim. It’s principles and practices became the model that HUD’s highly successful Hope VI program to rebuild public housing projects across the US into communities of choice. Many of these communities are now indistinguishable from their surroundings in a good way, but still provide subsidized and and affordable housing for residents of all colors. New urbanism de-stigmatized the look of public and affordable housing, and New Urbanism provided the impetus for the federal government through its funding programs and local governments through their land use authority, to create neighborhoods with a mix of uses, and incomes, ensuring that low-income and very low-income people would have clean and well-stocked stores (with fresh produce) and services to walk to, It ensured that kids would have safe routes on which to walk to school and, generally speaking New Urbanism lavished the design and attention to detail on neighborhoods serving a constituency of affordable housing residents previously had only gone into upscale neighborhoods. That’s because at its heart, New Urbanism is about planning justice. Low income people have a right to the basic amenities of urbanism that others take for granted: connectivity to neighborhoods beyond their own and the economic benefits that ensue, decent sidewalks and the health and environmental benefits that ensue, a choice of store, services and amenities to walk to, attractive parks and public spaces that are safer because they are designed with ‘eyes on the street and on the park’. Numerous social benefits ensue from that. Economic, environmental and social justice and equality form the foundation of sustainability and that is what New Urbanism is about.

  • Anonymous

    I like the part in your response on how you oh so eloquently defended 15 Group’s neglect and purposeful denial to improve conditions at Wyvernwood…….oh wait. Disaster capitalism and urban renewal displacement at its finest. People don’t see the negative effects that this plan will have since people don’t speak the uneasy truth on redevelopment that essentially transforms a part of town that its ultimate goal is to transform the entire community. 

    Also, I could tell Amyneal2 is not someone who interacts with progressive planners or public policy workers (or people with logic in general) since HOPE VI is frowned upon by many in the planning community and is seen as a means of gentrifying and removing the poorest of the poor from their communities. Furthermore, by removing poor residents, it eliminates their concerns and complaints about either neglected or lack of resources in the community such as lack of quality foods, green spaces, clean air, and good schools. Also, just as in the nearby public housing destruction of Pico Gardens and Pico Aliso (now Pueblo del Sol), this project is a gateway development site to eventually displace and destroy the Estrada Courts project.

    Instead of asking why Stephen Fink and his business have not kept up with the improvements AND why in particular is Mr. Fink so “dedicated” to this project when his own business and his residence isn’t even located on the Eastside of Los Angeles. No one is asking why hasn’t Boyle Heights have been given the opportunities for “connectivity to neighborhoods beyond their own and the economic benefits that ensue, decent sidewalks and the health and environmental benefits that ensue, a choice of store, services and amenities to walk to, attractive parks and public spaces” — WHY HASN’T STEPHEN FINK AND THE CITY OF L.A. moved to making that a priority all these years? 

    It’s a pretty sketchy situation and I’m sure Mr. Huizar will fall to pressure, but this is just another demonstration of business/$ pushing people into a desperate corner and forcing them to go along with their colonial projects of removing one population to make room for another. 


  • Amyneal2

    The_Herman_Cains states below that “Hope VI is frowned upon by many in the planning community”, which of course means that others in the planning community don’t frown upon it because of what it has accomplished. There is nothing in Hope VI that distinguishes between the poor and the poorest of the poor, and while in the early stages of the program, there was displacement that was corrected, but that discussion misses the point since Wyvernwood is not an ‘affordable housing’ neighborhood, nor is it public housing. it is rent controlled, but not designated affordable. Estrada Courts is owned by HACLA and is completely and totally separate. What I was saying is that there is nothing about New Urbanism that puts people of color at a disadvantage.


Developers and Proponents of New Wyvernwood Face Off at Special Forum Held by Council Member Huizar

City Council Member Jose Huizar, who represents Boyle Heights, East L.A. and parts of the Downtown, held a community meeting with the current residents of Wyvernwood Apartments to hear their concerns regarding the proposed redevelopment project to replace the current apartment with a higher-cost mixed-use housing development. In 2011, Huizar expressed concern with the project, […]

Boyle Heights Neighborhood Council Abandons Wyvernwood Decision, Removes Item From Agenda

Last week, the Boyle Heights Neighborhood Council’s executive committee struck from tomorrow’s general board meeting agenda the action item to support the Wyvernwood redevelopment project. After issues were brought up ranging from securing a proper location, to whether or not their decision would make a difference on the project, the neighborhood council doesn’t appear likely to revisit the […]