They Paved Paradise, Parking In Santa Monica

The Real Problem Sat Right Behind Us
Parking has been dominating the public policy debate in Santa Monica the past few weeks, ever since the local lobbying group Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City (SMCLC) made transportation consultant Jeffery Tumlin into a target. Unfortunately they subsequently succeeded in having him removed from Santa Monica projects after years of great work with city planning efforts including our Bike Action Plan.

Our Santa Monica weekly column is supported by Bike Center in Santa Monica.

The open letter against Tumlin created a stir about the use of the word “nimby” on his website biography, which Tumlin used to characterize the discussion around development in Santa Monica prior to the LUCE process, and has since apologized for. However, that comment had been on the website for years while Tumlin worked on Santa Monica planning projects, as Frank Gruber points in his recent post on the history underlining this whole matter.

The controversy over using the word nimby was most likely a convenient pretense for the real reason SMCLC wanted him gone: he has been pitching ideas to reform our outdated parking policies. Reform ideas which groups like SMCLC have depicted as radical, unfortunately contributing to the local media lens on this issue, which so often adopts or promotes the language of status quo advocates. Paul Barter of Reinventing Parking makes a a compelling case “it is the status quo that is extreme” in Santa Monica and most of the USA.

Looking back over the SMCLC letter, there is the line “…we are concerned by Mr. Tumlin’s proposal to decrease the amount of parking required by new developments in our city– this in spite of residents asking for MORE parking not less…”. One could also just as forcefully assert that residents have asked for less traffic congestion, perhaps even more loudly than for more parking. These two goals are at odds with each other in most contexts, especially locations as popular as Santa Monica.

Santa Monica Parking Land Use
My 2010 off-street parking land use map of DTSM

This is symptomatic of the “have our cake and eat it too” approach to traffic management so often advocated. Of course we cannot have everything we want simply because we want it. Real life involves trade offs. So despite having high parking minimums for decades, a sort of individual mandate for cars, on-street traffic only got more congested. If we build parking spaces faster than we build housing units, as has been the case for quite sometime and which high parking minimums ensure, it really shouldn’t be surprising that streets fill up with cars and that the scale of our parking lots dwarfs our parks for people.

When I look at the backlash to eliminating or even just dialing back parking minimum zoning, I encounter a lot of mistaken ideas about the proposals. One of the most egregious misinterpretations I encounter is believing that somehow dialing back the mandate is a grab for people’s existing parking. The reality is that removing or lowering the mandate is more akin to saying some developments in the future may build fewer parking spaces than one’s built since the 80’s, but would not be obligated to.

Another common misconception is that getting rid of parking minimums would result in a flood of new residential, commercial and mixed used buildings without any car parking and all of the residences would attract spill over curb parking demand in the street. Lowering or removing parking minimums would not force developers to provide less, unless parking maximums were adopted, an entirely different concept.

The city of Zurich Switzerland has employed parking maximums rather than minimums for quite some time. Zurich gradually over the years constricted the supply of inner city parking with a hard total cap, to clear then worsening traffic congestion, and make space for other street users. Initial skepticism gave way to majority public support in the most recent policy updates, following the success of earlier iterations of the measures. The Zurich example adds significant strength to the case that parking management is traffic management, which Tumlin had been advocating for Santa Monica.

Rite AidAs for the spill over concerns, that issue is most effectively managed on it’s own through residential permitting and metering. As long as curb space is a free for all (and there are few such places left in the city), or highly undervalued, than even when off-street parking is provided, many drivers still seek out curb space. Without a sufficient price signal or barrier to entry, there will always be those who wander around for blocks for the prime free space while entire decks of parking sit largely empty at or near their destination.

At 401 Broadway we saw that a mixed use residential development proposal can get through the public process and codes without any onsite parking at all, which is already allowable downtown but is not something any have tried to do in many years.  Meeting the public hurdle does not mean it will get built.

The financial institutions and banks which lend for real estate development construction are their own moderating entities. Banks tend to be conservative, and especially now with so many speculative ventures going bust in recent memory. Ideas that are newer or cutting edge for a given area, are typically not what most banks are interested in. Unfortunately, they rejected the bike parking only 401 Broadway proposal insisting car parking be added despite the difficulties of providing it at the constrained site.

Empty LotThe absence of government compulsion to build parking wouldn’t change the fact units with parking command more rent (to the detriment of the car-free) or net higher sale prices. Many people for the immediate foreseeable future will still want a place to park and will vote with their dollars for those who provide it. As Matt Yglesias somewhat comically put it recently, “…we do not mandate that apartments have mattresses included, and yet mattresses sell quite well because people are willing to pay extra for a soft surface to sleep on.”

Removing or dialing back the minimums allows market experimentation with tweaked business models. Ones that can start to serve clients that are now often undeserved (including car-free or 1 car households). Most of what would be built would likely be along familiar lines until some test cases start proving the waters first.

Reform would mean that older apartment buildings, including the one I live in currently and enjoy very much, would be legal to build again, offering a more affordable alternative to the more expensive parking heavy developments. It may also make conversions of commercial properties to residential or mixed use more attractive and more affordable, which could go a long way toward addressing the imbalance of insufficient housing for the size of our workforce.

The changing needs of the present, and the compelling and plausible shifts on the horizon in the foreseeable future, require a rethink of our approach to parking, and no amount of wishful thinking is going to change that. If we are as serious about sustainability in Santa Monica as we like to claim to be, there simply is no getting around the need to stop forcing automobile-centrism onto the landscape.

  • Charles_Siegel

    “Removing or dialing back the minimums allows market experimentation with
    tweaked business models.”

    But the principle of our economy is: free market for everything else, but socialism for the automobile. You are on your own and subject to market forces when it comes to getting yourself food or housing. But it is up to the government to make sure you have enough parking – presumably because parking (unlike food and housing) is a necessity.

  • sam

    vcCcxlvL-The 2013 summer came again, if you have love to choose a pair of christian louboutin shoes right now? christian louboutin pumps will make you a shine at the moment.Don’t do the most brilliant and also don’t do the lowest. christian louboutin sandals with its own language, confided women the curve of the gentle, sending out the mature female charm.christian louboutin sale shoes is popular all over the world.
    Nike Australia‘s official website mall is Nike Shoes Australia website designated authentic Nike Shoes Online store,providing professional nike 360,Nike Shoes,Nike basketball shoes,Nike football shoes,Nike running shoes,Nike running shoes,Nike 2012 new,Cheap Nike Shoes and other information!Quality assurance,Free delivery,seven days no reason returned,convenient and worry,JUST DO IT!
    Shop online at christian louboutin mall for a great selection of christian louboutin boots, christian wedding shoes,christian louboutin ankle boots and sandals for girls,women and men with free shopping on all orders.Welcome to luxury christian louboutin sale online store.The best christian louboutin at best price, free delivery,easy returns & exchanges,100% quality guarantee!Save 82% Off.Cheap christian louboutin daffodile makes a woman’s feet dazzle and shine even after the twelve strikes of midnight.Own a pair of stylish and wonderful christian louboutin shoes is women’s lifetime pursuit.
    Official Nike Australia mall is the only Nike Shoes Australia official shopping site,Nike Shoes Sale with most all the latest men’s,women’s,children’s,football,basketball,extreme sports,tennis,Nike6.0,Nike PRO,Cheap Nike Shoes,clothing, equipment,quality assurance,Free delivery,seven days no reason returned,convenient and worry,JUST DO IT!As a global sports giant Nike,Inc.,since its inception has used its impressive performance impresses founder Bill Bowerman once said the words: “As long as you have a body,you are an athlete.And as long as there are athletes in the world,Nike Shoes Online company will continue to grow and develop.
    christian louboutin sale is french hot brand in the world,We provide different kinds of christian louboutin.Choose the woman wearing christian louboutin shoes,often has realised that many men somehow to high-heeled shoes have deep interest,wear cheap christian louboutin sales shoes can easily outright conquest many men,can easily get many men worship,can easily make many men excited.christian louboutin outlet foot that one wipe enthusiastic red,no matter how plain clothes,they were unable to hide the hostess as fire the lively personality.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

A reckless rider pleads guilty to assault with a deadly weapon. But does that say more about the city that charged him than the cyclists that ride there?

|
Yes, bike riders are subject to the same laws drivers are. Maybe Santa Monica police and prosecutors wanted to send that message loud and clear. Maybe they wanted to make an example of one reckless cyclist so other bicyclists would straighten up and ride right. But to do it, they slapped a reckless, red light […]

Voter’s Guide: Santa Monica’s Prop. T

|
Ballot Initiative Proposition T Seeks To Limit Commercial Development in Santa Monica (Between now and the November 4th election, LA Streetsblog will be writing about as many local ballot measures that effect transportation that we can find.  Please email any suggestions to damien@streetsblog.org.) A group of Santa Monica residents known as the Santa Monica Coalition […]

Streetsblog Plants a Flag in Santa Monica

|
As we’ve struggled just to provide in-depth coverage of transportation issues in Los Angeles, Streetsblog’s coverage of Santa Monica has been uneven.  Every now and then a story about something really cool, or really stupid, would demand that we write a full story; but we were never able to create a consistent narrative for the […]

Three Years Later, Is Santa Monica’s Bike Action Plan Working?

|
In November 2011, the Santa Monica City Council unanimously — and enthusiastically — adopted the Bike Action Plan (BAP), an ambitious 300-page document that seeks to transform the bayside city into one of the most bike-friendly cities in the country. The BAP, the culmination of years of work by City Planning staff, local bike advocates, […]