Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Bicycling

Cases Against Two Hit-and-Run Drivers Roll On

8_24_09_die_in.jpg
Cyclists stage a "die-in" where Jesus Castillo was killed during April's Critical Mass.

Last Thursday "DJ Wheels" spent his day attending the arraignment of Robert Sanchez, the driver accused of killing Rod Armas and his fourteen year old son at the end of the L.A. Wheelman's June Grand Tour Double Century and then pedaling downtown to get an update on the trial of Alejandro Hidalgo, the driver accused of killing Jesus Castillo in a hit-and-run last April.

Ted Rogers already has most of Wheels' account at Biking In L.A., but I wanted to add a couple of my own thoughts.  First, both drivers are being accused of "gross vehicular manslaughter" and "driving under the influence."  Sanchez is also accused of "3)Cal. Vehicle Code 20001(a) – failure to stop after an accident involving an injury" and Castillo of "driving under the influence with a B.A.C. over .08."

A few thoughts here.  In the Sanchez case, the D.A. told the judge that Sanchez's blood-alcohol level was at .05 "five hours after the crash" which makes me believe that he could have been at .08 when he killed Armas and maimed his son.  Also, Sanchez was found two hours after the crash in a parking lot.  Why did it take three hours to submit a breathalyzer test? Are west coast treatment centers so overflowing that the state is trying not to find drunk drivers after a driver caused fatal crash?

In the Castillo case, the driver is charged with multiple drunk driving charges but not for the hit-and-run.  It was hours after Castillo was killed that the police picked up Hidalgo yet "hit-and-run" isn't included.

Regardless, both of these drivers are facing steep jail sentences if found guilty of these killings and of course the families of the two victims will be dealing with the results of these crashes for the rest of their lives.

While I might nit-pick the legal strategies to bring these drivers to justice, it's doubtless better than the justice that will be seen will be better than that seen by the cyclist killed by an LADWP driver on June 1.  In that case the LAPD determined the cyclist at fault because she was "riding in a crosswalk" and even worse "riding the wrong way in a crosswalk."  Of course, cyclists are allowed to ride in a crosswalk under the Los Angeles Municipal code, and there's no such thing as "riding the wrong way in a crosswalk."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Grand Opening of Transformative Rail-to-Rail Bike/Walk Path on Slauson Brings Community Out to Play

The $166M project was a dozen years in the making. South Central residents and electeds alike hope it is a foundation on which even better things can be built for the community.

May 22, 2025

Metro Quietly Withdraws Lyft Bike-Share Contract Vote

The current twice-botched will-they-won't-they procurement process is not doing Metro Bike Share any favors.

May 22, 2025

SGV Hikes and Bikes: Duck Farm River Park

Tucked in the crook of the 605 and Valley Boulevard is some much needed breathing room for the East Valley.

May 22, 2025

Eyes on the Street: Another Long Beach Development-Triggered Bike/Bus Improvement

Long Beach Boulevard has a new protected bike lane that runs at curb-level behind a new bus shelter.

May 20, 2025
See all posts