The Peculiar Federalism of Transit Safety: No National Standards Exist

The recent crash of two D.C. Metro trains has laid bare a glaring
lack of authority at the obscure local committee that is supposed to
ensure transit riders’ safety, as the Washington Post reported today.
But the problem is bigger than the nation’s capital: The Federal
Transit Administration (FTA) has not issued broad safety rules for rail
transit, leaving the issue in the hands of state oversight agencies.

reagan_metro_station.jpgThe
state agency overseeing safety on this D.C. Metro train has almost one
full-time employee, according to the Washington Post. (Photo: VisitingDC.com)

The
Obama administration plans to reform this federalist approach to
transit safety, which has allowed the D.C. Metro to postpone
installation of a backup train monitoring system suggested by the
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

Aside from
California’s 12-person oversight panel, the average state safety agency
has less than one full-time employee, FTA chief Peter Rogoff said last
week.

Meanwhile, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) recently ruled
that "positive train control" crash protection systems must be in use
on commuter and inter-city passenger rail systems — though it lacks
the power to extend that mandate to rail transit.

"What’s more important
than whether the FTA [sets national safety standards] or whether the FRA does it is that someone
does it who has the teeth and the authority and the funding and the
personnel to really compel the attention of the transit agencies," Rogoff told the Senate Banking Committee.

Sen.
Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) introduced legislation two weeks ago that would
authorize the U.S. DOT to begin setting national safety guidelines for
rail transit. In her speech introducing the bill, Mikulski said she was
responding to an NTSB briefing she received after the D.C. Metro crash
on June 22.

This is when I learned the NTSB had recommended that the … FTA establish federal standards for metro
systems but the FTA had not taken action. Apparently, the FTA doesn’t
think it has this authority. Well, my
bill fixes that.

But
how does the American Public Transportation Association (APTA), which
represents the
nation’s transit networks, view the prospect of federal oversight? APTA
President William Millar told the Post he was wary of "throw[ing] the
baby out with the bath water," given that transit remains far safer than car travel, but he refrained from weighing in on the Mikulski bill.

Late Update:
APTA spokeswoman Virginia Miller told Streetsblog Capitol Hill that the
group "has not yet taken a position on whether or not the FTA should
have regulatory oversight" but plans to work with Congress and the
administration "to continue to improve safety in an already very safe
industry."

Miller also cited U.S. DOT data that showed a 0.03
percent per-passenger fatality rate for every 100 million miles
traveled on transit between 2002 and 2008. For autos, the fatality rate
was 0.87 percent — or 29 times higher.

  • Please let Elana know that California is nothing to be modeled. 4 out of 5 of the deadliest light rail systems and two of the deadliest commuter rail systems all operate under the watch of the CPUC.

  • Here comes the safety police again!

    Why not stop there lets go after the airlines, grade separating roads around every school, protect suicidal people jumping in front of subway trains or jumping off bridges or off buildings or slitting their wrists or putting their heads in ovens or putting a gun in their mouths and drug overdoses…

  • sigh…..

    Damien: not too bright…

  • KinOfCain

    The FRA is probably the right organization to be responsible for this, but they need to be reorganized and most likely better funded. There are a number of areas where national standards would be beneficial but the FRA hasn’t updated their recommendations. In addition to train control standards, things like platform loading height standards for level-boarding, electrification standards, light weight and high speed passenger rail safety standards (as opposed to just giving exemptions), standards for anything over 150mph, light weight freight standards, etc. etc. etc.

  • FixHighways

    ^ That would be a good idea to that.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

Will Federal Oversight Help or Hinder DC Transit?

|
The feds have taken over safety oversight of D.C.’s embattled Metro, and that could actually be cause for concern, says David Alpert at Greater Greater Washington. U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx laid out his vision for safety-related reforms under the aegis of the Federal Transit Administration in a recent piece in the Washington Post. One person was killed when smoke filled […]

Following ‘Cash for Clunkers’ with ‘Riches for Rail’

|
(Photo: Washington Post) Robert Menendez (D-NJ), a senior member of the Senate Banking Committee, began his hearing on transit today by displaying the above cartoon by Pulitzer prize-winner Tom Toles. The senator’s message parallels Toles’: In a world where the auto industry can get $2 billion more in one week, what’s to be done about […]