Metro Board Will Discuss Sheriff Audit Reports and Shortcomings on Thursday

Thursday at noon the Metro Board is holding a workshop on the recent audit of the security contract it has with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LASD). The unit of the LASD that handles the contract is known as Metro Transit Services which has an online presence on Facebook, Twitter and nixle.

To read the report, click ##http://www.scribd.com/doc/238287478/Los-Angeles-County-Sheriff-s-Department-Contract-Audit-Report-May-2014##here.##
To read the report, click ##http://www.scribd.com/doc/238287478/Los-Angeles-County-Sheriff-s-Department-Contract-Audit-Report-May-2014##here.##

In 1997 Metro’s Police Department was replaced by a partnership of the Los Angeles Police Department and Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. Then in 2003 when it was due to be renewed LASD was able to freeze out the LADP and take over the entire contract, which they have held since that time via periodic renewals. For the period of July 2013-June 2014 LASD received $83,855,638 for the contract.

Earlier this year, I was elated to learn (via this comment made by taipan85 to my piece on the Metro fare restructuring proposal) that an audit was underway in response to a motion (#21) made in June 2013 by then Metro Board member Mel Wilson. At that time, Wilson was chair of the Metro Finance, Budget and Audit Committee. Wilson stated that in the prior year various troubling Sheriff’s Department items came before his committee, so he decided that a thorough audit was called for to see if other aspects of the LASD’s performance were similarly inadequate.

The establishment of the partnership and then the LASD getting the entire contract were during the years I attended Metro Board meetings. As I watched this unfold, it became clear that the entire process was extremely political and had little to do with providing the best policing services for Metro patrons. The audit and the follow-up peer review, facilitated at the request of Metro CEO Art Leahy, by the American Public Transportation Association (a trade group), confirm my long-held suspicions of how poorly the LASD has been fulfilling the contract.

It is dismaying that the staff report for the meeting Thursday glosses over the depth of the problems with claims of recent improvements and opportunities. This begs the question: would these recent improvements have occurred if Wilson had not requested the audit?

These improvements are undertaken as the contract is coming up for renewal, and LASD no longer can assume renewal will be a rubber stamp. LASD’s creation of a Transit Policing Division looks like an acknowledgement the LASD has not been doing the job, and are hastily trying to clean up their act. I have to imagine that the three responses to the request of interest regarding the new transit policing contract are making LASD nervous. If LASD is one of the three, who are the other two?

The current LASD contract extension expires on Dec. 31st. I will be curious how this all plays out.

I will be attending the meeting on Thursday, and will use my 60 seconds of public comment to remind the Metro Board that they should have been asking questions years ago about this situation. Metro boardmembers shouldn’t expect to squirm out of responsibility with self-serving blog posts that laud “tough reforms” when the Board deserves no credit for allowing this mess to fester. I expect that boardmembers may be likely to launch into their best Captain Renault imitations with protestations they are “Shocked! Shocked! Shocked!” at the audit’s findings! Then they will attempt to make a big deal about improvements and avoid questions about how they happened and who is to blame for the years of mis-management and sub-standard performance.

BTW, though it is a public document, the actual full audit document heretofore hadn’t been made available online. I had to go down to Metro’s Record Management Department with a flash drive to obtain it and then post it at this link provided above. Because I thought we deserved to be able to see the report instead of relying on descriptions in staff reports and coverage in the media.

4 thoughts on Metro Board Will Discuss Sheriff Audit Reports and Shortcomings on Thursday

  1. Not having read the actual document (yet) – could Dana (or anyone else) tell me what sort of problems it spells out?

  2. The staff report for Thursday in section 3 “Results of the evaluation” summarizes the findings.

    http://media.metro.net/board/Items/2014/09_september/20140904sbmitem1.pdf

    50 recommendations were made and supposedly Metro and LASD agreed with most of them and “corrective actions initiated where appropriate”.

    One troubling discovery is in 2008 a consultant reviewed Metro security and the recommendations he made were not implemented. How to make sure the current audit results in real improvements and put in place a process where henceforth the sorts of deep deficiencies described in the audit aren’t allowed to remain unaddressed is the key management and Board oversight issue that I will be looking for some answers regarding at the Thursday meeting.

  3. I just posted above, but I should note the problems are both in terms of methodology, tactics and administrative. It found profound problems and shortcomings at multiple levels.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Metro Extends Sheriff Contract 6 Months; What’s In Metro Policing’s Future?

|
Last week, the Metro Board of Directors finally took action on its repeatedly-extended, repeatedly-about-to-expire contract with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LASD). Metro approved a $44.44 million 6-month extension of the $83 million annual contract covering policing for its entire bus and rail transportation networks. This is the eleventh modification of the contract; most of […]
Left to right, Metro security director Alex Wiggins, LA County Sheriff Jim McDonnell,  LAPD Chief Charlie Beck, and LBPD Chief Robert Luna testifying in support of Metro's ballooning $646 million transit policing contract. Photos: Joe Linton/Streetsblog L.A.

Metro Approves $646M Annual Multi-Agency Transit Policing Contract

|
At today’s meeting, the Metro board approved a new five-year multi-agency transit policing contract. For the past decade, transit policing had been done by the L.A. County Sheriff Department (LASD.) Under the new contract transit policing will be done by LAPD, LASD, and Long Beach Police Department. When the proposal first came to the board […]
Seated in the front row at today's Metro board meeting are LAPD Chief Charlie Beck, LA County Sheriff Jim McDonnell, and LBPD Chief Robert Luna. Photo: Joe Linton/Streetsblog L.A.

Metro Board Delays Transit Policing Contract For Three Months

|
At the end of today's nearly 6-hour Metro board of directors meeting, the vote on the staff-recommended $547 million multi-agency transit policing contract was pushed back three months. Metro's new transit policing arrangement would scale back the L.A. County Sheriffs Department's current role in favor of a majority of the work being done by LAPD.

Metro April News: Crenshaw Work Stoppage, All Door Boarding, and More

|
Today was the April meeting of Metro’s board of directors. There was nothing earth-shatteringly controversial on the agenda, but below are a handful of updates. Crenshaw / LAX Construction Work Stoppage As mentioned on SBLA Twitter and explained in this headlined L.A. Times article, safety violations caused Metro to take the unprecedented step of stopping construction on […]