California Legislation Watch: Weekly Update

Screen Shot 2014-05-02 at 4.34.24 PMHere is Streetsblog’s weekly highlight of California legislation related to sustainable transportation.

Vulnerable Users Bill Watered Down: In its slog through the legislative process, AB 2398 from Marc Levine (D-San Rafael) was amended to lower the maximum fine on a conviction for causing bodily injury to a special class of “vulnerable road users” from $1,000 to $300.

The Senate Committee on Transportation and Housing had balked at the size of the $1,000 fine, which could end up costing more than $4,000 after surcharges and fees are added. As amended, the fines under the bill would now range from $220 to $300, resulting in total fines between $1,033 and $1,361. The amended legislation would still be an increase over current fines.

Another amendment added Segway and wheelchair users to the definition of “vulnerable users,” which already includes bicyclists, pedestrians, highway workers, horseback riders, and drivers of farm equipment.

Protected Bike Lane Bill Adds “Freedom from Caltrans” Clause: AB 1193 from Phil Ting (D-San Francisco) would require Caltrans to develop standards for protected bike lanes so that local jurisdictions can plan and build them with the agency’s blessing. An amendment published this week changed a single word — from “shall” to “may”– opening up new possibilities for “all city, county, regional, and other local agencies responsible for the development or operation of bikeways or roadways where bicycle travel is permitted.”

The change in verbage means cities would no longer be required to use Caltrans’ criteria when designing bicycle facilities. Bicycling advocates and planners have long argued that it’s inconsistent to require planners and engineers to adhere to Caltrans standards for bike facilities, but not other roadway features on local streets and roads.

This bill will be considered in committee on Tuesday. Expect to hear more about it soon.

Uber, Lyft, Etc. Facing Regulation: A long, contentious hearing on two bills that would regulate Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) such as Uber and Lyft resulted in some compromise amendments. A.B. 612 from Assemblymember Adrin Nazarian (D-Los Angeles) would have required the companies to comply with the same rules as taxi companies, including drug and alcohol testing of drivers, criminal background checks, driver fingerprinting, and registering TNC vehicles with the California Public Utilities Commission. The Senate Energy Committee removed everything but the drug and alcohol testing and background check rules and sent it back to the Insurance Committee.

The same committee also passed along A.B. 2293 from Susan Bonilla  (D-Concord), which would add requirements that TNC  company insurance be the primary policy while drivers are working. The specific amount of required insurance was a sticking point in the hearing, and remains open for debate. Lyft spokesperson Page Thielen released a statement saying the “hearing demonstrated that there is no clear consensus about how to best determine appropriate levels of insurance for ride-sharing, and we will continue working with legislators to ensure that consumers, drivers, and passengers have the ability to access safe rides from the Lyft community.” See KQED’s News Fix blog for excellent coverage of the various sides of this issue.

Email tips, alerts, press releases, ideas, etc. to melanie@streetsblog.org.

For social media coverage focused on state-wide issues, follow Melanie @currymel on Twitter or like our Facebook page here.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

California Legislation Watch: Weekly Update

|
Here is Streetsblog’s weekly highlight of California legislation related to sustainable transportation. Today was the last day to amend bills for this legislative session. Any bill that doesn’t get passed by midnight next Sunday, August 31, will be officially dead. Among the flurry of votes, the following bills passed out of both the Assembly and […]

California Legislation Watch: Weekly Update

|
For social media coverage focused on statewide issues, follow Melanie @currymel on Twitter or like our Facebook page here. Here’s Streetsblog’s weekly highlight of legislation and events related to sustainable transportation at the California capitol. The big news out of Sacramento is that Caltrans endorsed the NACTO Urban Street Design Guidelines. S.B. 1183, Mark DeSaulnier (D-Concord): […]

California Legislation Watch: Weekly Update

|
Here is Streetsblog’s weekly highlight of California legislation related to sustainable transportation. School Zone Safety: S.B. 1151 from Anthony Canella (R-Ceres) would raise fines for traffic infractions within school zones. The bill passed the Assembly Transportation Committee, 14-0, and now goes to the Appropriations Committee. Vulnerable User Law Jumps Ahead: A.B. 2398 from Marc Levine […]

California Legislation Watch: Weekly Update

|
This week and the next are busy ones in Sacramento. Next Friday, May 2, is the last day policy committees (e.g. Transportation and Housing) can discuss bills that require a hearing in any fiscal committees (e.g. Appropriations). A.B. 2398, Marc Levine (D-San Rafael): The “vulnerable road user law” that raises the fines for drivers convicted […]

California Legislation Watch: Weekly Update

|
The California Legislature saw a lot of action in the last two weeks on bills related to sustainable transportation. The deadline to pass bills out of committee was on the Friday before Memorial Day weekend, and today is the deadline for all bills to be voted on by their houses of origin. If they couldn’t pass […]