Breaking News: Deal Reached on CA’s Cap-and-Trade Spending Plan

Earlier this evening, the bicameral Budget Conference Committee  approved a compromise between state legislators and Governor Brown on how to spend $850 million in revenues from the state’s cap-and-trade system for the next fiscal year.

The new plan largely stuck to the Governor’s original proposal for the first year of the expenditure plan, but it adds set-asides for transit and affordable housing, two important parts of the Senate’s proposal. The compromise also incorporates an allocation method for funding in future years.

Despite Republican opposition, California High Speed Rail will still receive one-quarter of the funds generated by the state’s Cap and Trade Program.

The compromise proposal sets aside $250 million for high-speed rail, which is what the Governor proposed, but future year allocations for the bullet train would be 25 percent rather than the 33 percent he requested. The Senate’s proposal called for 15 percent allocated to high speed rail.

The agreement would split the $50 million Brown proposed for intercity rail, giving half to transit capital and construction costs and dividing the other half between transit operations and intercity rail. Future revenue streams would give 5 percent to each of the three categories, giving transit a solid, predictable source of funding for at least the next five years.

Brown’s original proposal had no set aside for local transit, but the Senate, under the leadership of Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento), had countered the governor’s plan by calling for $200 million for transit operating and capital expenses.

Steinberg’s plan called for 20 percent of cap-and-trade funds to be spent on affordable housing near transit and sustainable communities planning. This would have amounted to about $170 million the first year. The current agreement would give this category of projects — which could include bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and planning — about $130 million in the first year, with future allocations at 20 percent.

“This plan is good for California,” said committee co-chair Mark Leno (D- San Francisco). “With this proposal we will continue to not only lead the state but also the nation on this important issue of greenhouse gas emission reduction, when time is running out.”

Senator Jeff Gorell (R-Camarillo) objected to funding high-speed rail with cap-and-trade revenue, pointing to the recent decision in the House of Representatives to “defund” the project. He also complained that the greenhouse gas reduction resulting from the compromise would be “insignificant.”

The plan will be voted on as part of the entire state budget within the next few days, perhaps as late as Sunday. Everyday after Sunday that the budget is not passed results in a salary penalty to law makers that they appear eager to avoid. The new budget goes into effect on July 1.

  • nad

    Is it just me, or is this article 100% confusing? I know reporting on budgets is thorny by nature, but I’d hope Streetsblog could at least make clear what the compromise percentages are.

  • Nathanael

    I am also confused.

  • Melanie Curry

    First year (2014-15): $250 m to HSR; $25 m to transit capital, $25 m to transit ops and intercity rail; $130 m to affordable housing and sustainable communities; remaining funds for other uses like low-carbon transportation (electric vehicles and clean freight), water energy use, forests, etc. Future years: 25% HSR; 20% affordable housing and sustainable communities; 5% transit operations; 5% transit capital; 5% intercity rail; remaining divided generally as above. Sorry this wasn’t clear.

  • Juan Matute

    Now that there’s a consensus plan, it would be nice to have a new infographic.

  • Kenny Easwaran

    Set-aside money for transit operations is huge! It’s the one meaningful point that the Bus Riders Union consistently makes – we need to fund operations if we’re going to do anything with this expansion of rail.

  • Joe Linton

    Yes – I think operations funding is good news for overall transit system health – in L.A., O.C., and all over CA. I’ll see if SBLA can explore this further.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Infographic: Comparing California’s Three Cap-and-Trade Spending Proposals

|
In the midst of California’s state budget negotiations, the legislature must separately decide how to spend the state’s cap-and-trade revenue, be it on public transit, high-speed rail, affordable housing near transit, or other emissions-reducing programs. Three different proposals for slicing this new pie come from Governor Jerry Brown, the Senate, and the Assembly. In the next […]

Steinberg’s Cap-and-Trade Spending Plan Gains Momentum, No News on Deal

|
Despite being only 0.5 percent of the California budget, cap-and-trade revenue spending is emerging as a sticking point in Sacramento as Democrats in the Assembly, Senate, and Governor’s Office push three different spending plans. The legislature must approve a state budget by June 15. Each of the three proposed plans for spending cap-and-trade revenue to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) […]

CA Sen. Steinberg Proposes New Spending Plan for Cap-and-Trade Revenue

|
Senate President Pro Tempore Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) announced a proposed plan to create a permanent spending strategy for cap-and-trade revenue [PDF] that prioritizes investments in affordable transit-oriented housing, transit expansion, and CA high-speed rail. Unlike the Governor’s plan for this year’s budget, Senate Bill 1156 also proposes investments in “complete streets” and transit operations. Calling the […]

Report: In Cutting Emissions, CAHSR Expensive Compared to Local Upgrades

|
Streetfilms featured Los Angeles’ Orange Line BRT and bike path in 2009. A new UCLA report says infrastructure projects like the Orange Line are a better way to invest cap-and-trade funds than CA High-Speed Rail. UCLA’s Lewis Center published a report yesterday finding that California’s High-Speed Rail project is a relatively expensive way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) […]

CA Asm. Richard Bloom Talks Budgets, Cap-and-Trade, Streetcars, and More

|
Last week, Streetsblog sat down with California Assemblymember Richard Bloom, who represents Santa Monica and other West Los Angeles communities. We asked him to talk about the state budget, the cap-and-trade expenditure plan, and funding for transit and housing. Bloom chairs the Subcommittee for Transportation for the California Assembly Budget Committee. Bloom talked about the […]