L.A. Weekly Claims the Mantle of Defender of Dangerous Drivers

Driver-Texting-While-A-Child-walks
Image: ##http://www.technocrazed.com/apple-to-save-lives-by-new-texting-lockout-mechanism-at-high-speed##Technocrazed##

There was a decent amount of outrage aimed at Hillel Aron at L.A. Weekly for his web-exclusive op/ed boasting about his driving prowess and defending his habit of texting-while-driving. I’ve considered myself something of a Hillel fan since his “Bikeroots” piece in 2011, so I was both surprised and a little dismayed while reading a piece that seemed so wildly tone-deaf.

A sample:

And so when we get a call, we’re forced to go digging through our glove compartments like desperate raccoons, looking for our filthy ear buds, an act infinitely more dangerous than simply holding something up to our ear.

Well I say: nuts to that.

I started a draft criticizing the piece, then scrapped it. I thought I should email him first. We had talked several times before. I’ve been quoted in some of his articles. So, I started an email last night I was going to send to him this morning.

Then, I saw the piece in Media Bistro, a web site that does little more than critique other media, and I realized the problem is bigger than Aron (whom I never emailed). Media Bistro corresponded with Sarah Fenske, the Weekly’s Editor in Chief. Fenske’s defense of the editorial decision to run the piece was even more bizarre than just reading Aron’s piece. From Fenske’s email response published at Media Bistro:

“When Hillel pitched this idea at our news blog meeting, it’s fair to say several jaws dropped. (Personally, as a chronic speeder, I consider any driver meandering along, texting, while I’m trying to get somewhere fast to be a mortal enemy.) But it was very clear to all of us as we chewed it over that he was only admitting to something that a vast majority of LA drivers do with impunity.”

“I suspect that at least half the commenters shaking their fist in his direction will send a text, or check their phones, or Tweet something, on their way home tonight. Everyone’s outraged about it; at least on the roads I’m driving, everyone’s still doing it.”

“And behind all the provocative rhetoric, he does make one good point: Distracted driving has long been illegal. As it should be. Texters are not necessarily any worse than the drivers putting on makeup, or eating breakfast. Yet texting is what we get wound up about (as, yes, this story proves!)”

Yes, this article proves that people get upset when someone brags about how they engage in dangerous behavior which proves your point that…wait, what?

And what’s up with the defense of speeding? Speeding has a long deadly track record; it’s arguably more dangerous than distracted driving or texting. Anyone in Fenske’s way considered a “mortal enemy”? Yes, it’s an email using hyperbole for effect, and I had to double-check the definition to be sure Fenske wrote what I thought she wrote, but Fenske appears to be stating that slower-moving drivers (in the way of her speeding) are actually trying to kill her.

I will give Fenske credit for one thing. I had never thought of texting-while-driving and searching-through-your-glovebox-for-a-filthy-earpiece-while-driving as akin to traffic calming. Kudos for thinking outside the box.

A couple of years ago, I had a story idea to write about why LAist, L.A. Weekly and the Daily News (to name a few) publish the locations of DUI checkpoints. Each organization explained to me that they believed that publishing these locations actually made the roads safer, and a public relations person at the Sheriff’s backed them up. While this seems counter-intuitive to me, I never got around to writing the story.

But now that the Weekly is on the record in favor of texting while driving and driving at unsafe speeds, it’s getting harder and harder to believe that public safety on the roadway is something they take seriously at all.

Hillel Aaron’s piece states: “Let’s face it, we all text in the car some of the time.” Sarah Fenske further states “everyone’s still doing it.”

For the record, I can name a whole group of people who don’t text and drive or drive at unsafe speeds.

They’re known as “people who don’t drive.” Because you are driving around with a suit of armor known as a car, and they are not, you are responsible to pay close attention to them at all times. These people are your grandparents, your weird friend who bikes everywhere, and, most importantly to me, THEY ARE MY CHILDREN. So if I sound mad or outraged, it’s not somehow proving your point. It’s because you’re acting like an asshole.

  • losangelebicycleattorney.com

    What makes you think he’s just acting?

  • Joe Linton

    It sad to me how driver-centric blindness toward roadway violence becomes a race to the bottom. Aron asserts that because his friends speed dangerously he should text. He asserts that because there are other distractions, texting isn’t so bad. Fenske asserts that because she speeds, texting isn’t so bad. It’s depressing.

    (And people have the nerve to call us “scofflaw cyclists”!!)

  • Juan Matute

    because why would anyone in online media do something just for the pageviews?

  • Evan G.

    I look forward to the Weekly’s piece from someone who drives buzzed with a few drinks in them because they’re still totally under control and drive just as well as they do sober.

  • bikinginla

    I, for one, have never texted while operating a motor vehicle, and never will. I also do my best never to use a cell phone at all while driving, hands-free or not.

    But what I find interesting is that Aron has confessed in advance for any collision he may have in the future. Good luck with that.

  • jean_luc_turbo

    When I went from being mostly a driver to being mostly a mass-transited enhanced pedestrian, I saw that the problem is most drivers are never pedestrians enough of the time to be able to walk in our moccasins and see things from our point of view. They don’t get how negligent their passively dangerous driving is too us peds.

  • AmandaInMotion

    Attempting to get the state to “crack down” even more on drunk drivers is NOT the answer to ending alcohol-related deaths on the road. It only leads to more of this kind of incident (http://tinyurl.com/q7l3bs2), where overzealous police took a driver to the hospital against his will and stuck him with a needle as a forced sobriety test. I really believe that technology is the answer to this problem – Google’s self-driving cars are currently being tested (successfully) around the D.C. area. Humans are fallible, so accident-avoidant computers make much better drivers.

  • Roger

    Damien, great piece. There were times when American society thought it was perfectly okay to burn witches, own other human beings, or put leeches on sick people to make them better. These jackasses are playing automobile Russian Roulette with the public. It’s disgusting and inexcusable.

  • Joe B

    We need a database, somewhere, of these whackos who brag online about their dangerous driving habits.

    That way, when they hit one of us, we can easily look up evidence of their prior recklessness and hand it to the DA.

  • Kenny Easwaran

    Robot cars are definitely a reasonable part of a long-term solution to this. But we have the technology to prevent drunk driving and texting while driving now, and it’s called the bus. We just aren’t implementing it enough to make it an attractive option to enough people. Lyft and Uber are also helping in Los Angeles – there has long been a population that doesn’t mind the price involved with taking a taxi, but won’t do it because of the difficulty involved in getting one (especially to get to the bar in the first place), and these apps take that difficulty out.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Open Discussion: Hey, I’m Texting Here!

|
“Sammy, stop!” I shout as my son pedals down the sidewalk. It wasn’t an intersection that he was looking to race through, but one of the many curb-cut driveways that dot the last block between our residence and the market. This morning, while Sahra and I were having our somewhat regular Google Hangout, we were […]

Five Things I’m Thinking About Transportation

|
When I last took a paternity leave, I returned with a brief column on some stories I would never get to flesh out that occured during my time off. Sometime after that, Steve Hymon started running an occasional “5 Things I’m Thinking About Transportation” series. I’ve rarely done it, but if it’s good enough for […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Courtland Milloy’s Bike Hate Gets the Smackdown It Deserves

|
Bicyclists, pacificists, and reasonable people everywhere are up in arms today about Courtland Milloy’s outrageous column, published last night on Washington Post’s website, in which he suggests drivers should go ahead and intentionally hit cyclists if they feel like it. By somehow casting people on bicycles as “bullies” and “terrorists” — for reasons that never become […]

Charles Crumpley Should Stop Talking About Transportation

|
When I got an email pointing me to “Stop the War on Drivers,” a new piece by Charles Crumpley, I was giddy. Crumpley’s fact-free transportation writing is easy fodder. I knew I had my story for the day. The last time Charles Crumpley, the main editor of the Los Angeles Business Journal, wrote about transportation and […]