Bill Suspending Hit-and-Run Drivers’ Licenses Passes Assembly Committee

Last week, the Associated Press released a video of a hit-and-run crash in Orange County. The video is available to view here.

The California Assembly’s Public Safety Committee voted 7-0 Tuesday to approve A.B. 1532, which would require an automatic license suspension for drivers who flee the scene of a crash where a person is hit, even if that person is not injured.

That unanimous vote marks an exceptional win for the bill, which was introduced by Mike Gatto (D-Los Angeles). Typically, bills which increase penalties for existing crimes or increase the burden on law enforcement are subject to extra scrutiny and face an uphill battle gaining committee votes.

CA’s current hit-and-run laws require drivers to stop when they are involved in crashes, and drivers who kill or seriously injure others and flee the scene can face severe penalties. A.B. 1532 would add penalties for cases where the injuries are minor, including automatic license suspension.

“The bill’s key aspect is that it increases minimum penalties so there is no less than a six-month mandatory license suspension,” explained Damian Kevitt of FinishtheRide.org. “That way prosecutors can no longer mitigate a hit-and-run down to a $500 misdemeanor fine, which is a slap on the wrist.”

“Hit-and-run drivers should be penalized, as this legislation requires,” said Nicole Schneider, executive director of Walk San Francisco, who applauded the bill as “a good step towards creating a culture where people respect each other.”

“This addresses the middle ground for those hit-and-runs that aren’t severe, making a statement that it’s not okay to leave the scene of a crash.”

This is Gatto’s second legislative effort to rein in drivers involved in hit-and-run crashes. Last year, he introduced A.B. 184, to extend the statute of limitations on hit-and-runs — the “maximum time after an event that legal proceedings based on that event may be initiated,” to borrow language from Wikipedia — to give officials more time to find and prosecute perpetrators. Although the bill passed the Public Safety Committee with an essentially infinite time limit, it was later amended in the Senate to limit it to six years, effectively doubling the time period set in existing law.

Tony Dang of California Walks praised Gatto for “really taking the hit-and-run issue and running with it,” though he noted that it’s an “incremental step” towards making streets safer for pedestrians in the state. “The legislation only addresses one type of crash. Hit-and-runs are serious, but we also need to deal with bigger pedestrian and bicycle safety issues.”

The bill next goes to the Assembly’s Transportation Committee, and must also pass the Assembly Appropriations Committee before the full Assembly votes on it. After that, it needs approval from the Senate and its committees. So despite the unanimous vote from the Public Safety Committee, there are a number of chances for the bill to be watered down by opponents.

Kevitt commended Gatto and other legislators for their efforts to increase penalties for hit-and-run crashes, “but they are too few and far between,” he said. “Elected officials need to start taking notice of this issue.”

Kevitt said his organization, FinishtheRide.org, plans to launch a petition urging the state legislature to increase penalties for hit-and-run crashes to a level on par with those of a DUI. The petition will also call for a requirement that police departments track hit-and-run statistics and devote a greater share of resources to prosecuting those cases. “Right now LAPD doesn’t track statistics,” he said. “So we don’t know what are the most common causes of hit-and-run crashes. Is it unlicensed drivers? DUIs? Texting?”

  • MaxUtil

    While it would be nice to see more action on measures that would actually reduce crashes rather than just improve drivers’ behavior after a crash, this is still a major improvement to the concept that you are responsible for your actions when operating a vehicle. Thanks Roadblock for getting this issue the attention it needed.

  • Kevin

    You should have a trigger warning before you show graphic pictures like this.

  • Tom

    Having hit-and-run penalties so far below DUI penalties encourages drunk drivers to flee the scene and find a place to sober up before being caught, instead of sticking around to call 911. Since every second counts for the victim, this means many victims die needlessly. The legislators who vote against making hit-and-run a real crime instead of a slap on the wrist would rather keep this loophole for drunk drivers and condemn thousands of innocent victims to death.

    Hit-and-run penalties should be tied to DUI penalties, so that if in the future DUI penalties are further stiffened, the hit-and-run penalties will automatically stiffen at the same time, plus 10%. The safety of the victims should come first.

  • ChrisLoos

    Seriously?

  • Faded_seaside

    According to the linked article, the video above does not depict a fatality: “The girl was treated at a hospital for a leg injury and released. Police say she darted into traffic against a red light.”

    Edit: looks like it’s already been fixed. Thanks!

  • Yes, there are victims of wrecks who still have PTSD from the wreck and seeing a similar wreck is a trigger for an attack. Fortunately for me seeing another wreck is not a trigger for me (getting passed closer than arm’s reach certainly is).

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

CA Bills to Crack Down on Hit-and-Run Drivers Sail Through Committees

|
Two bills focused on addressing hit-and-run crashes, authored by CA Assemblymember Mike Gatto, appear quickly on their way to being passed. A.B. 47, which would create an alert system on California highways to help the public assist police in catching drivers involved in hit-and-run crashes, sailed through the Senate Public Safety Committee Tuesday with a 6-1 […]

California Bill Would Remove Legal Loophole for Hit-and-Run Drivers

|
The California Senate is scheduled to vote on a bill next week from Assemblymember Steven Bradford (D-Gardena) that would close a loophole in state law that allows some hit-and-run perpetrators to avoid criminal prosecution. Current law requires any driver involved in a collision that results in injury, death, or property damage to stop and provide contact information […]