Eastside Access Project Takes Another Step Forward, Experiences Growing Pains

New trees will take years to offer a fraction of the shade and other benefits that the ficus trees slated for removal do. Sahra Sulaiman/LA Streetsblog

As I walked along 1st St. last week, I came across a gentleman standing outside a storefront, staring at the square of dirt where a huge ficus tree had once stood.

The sudden launch of tree-cutting operations along the corridor a few weekends ago took many by surprise (and some dismay).

While the ficus trees were not necessarily beautiful, they had sported sizable canopies that offered shoppers shelter from the sun and made the sidewalk feel a little more intimate. Now, it felt like they had never been there, their previous square homes carefully filled in with dirt, no trace of tree debris left behind. Yet that section of street felt oddly naked and exposed.

Like a number of folks from the area, the gentleman was unhappy that he hadn’t had any advance warning about the operations (notices had been taped to trees for some time, but they did not contain information about dates of removal). He was also suspicious of how funds were being used.

The tree well the gentleman I spoke with was staring at. Sahra Sulaiman/LA Streetsblog

They did it on a Saturday, he said in Spanish. So, it costs more — that’s more of our tax money.

He knew that it was part of some sort of improvements going on in the area and had heard the 91 trees would be replaced. But he didn’t like that it would take years for the trees to reach maturity and offer the community shelter and cleaner air. Or that it might be some time before the new trees were even planted.

He shook his head.

It’s a shame.

As I walked up and down 1st looking at the trees slated to meet their doom, I pondered the challenge of bringing investment to an area.

There’s a lot of excitement around what’s in store for the 1st Street Corridor and the Boyle Heights Arts District as part of the Eastside Access project.

The $12 million project, funded by Measure R, promises new, decorative sidewalks, 180 new trees, more street lighting, and street furniture that reflects the character of the community. At a groundbreaking yesterday, they even announced the intention to bring on 9 local muralists to paint utility boxes (located between Boyle and Soto) with original works.

But there’s also a lot of concern.

The interventions are focused on improving pedestrian and bicycle access to stops along the Gold Line corridor. Specifically, the project focuses on (see here for project boards):

  • Garden Street on Bailey: will serve as an extension of Mariachi Plaza through enhancements of the pedestrian experience, including lighting improvements, shade trees, seating areas, and two small gardens at corner of Bailey and Pennsylvania.
  • 1st and Cummings Plaza: will connect two important stations and the commercial district, currently separated by the freeway. Small plazas and more greenery will enhance the environment.
  • Arts and Civic Streetscape (1st St.): will transform the walking environment between Mariachi Plaza and Soto Street stations, with all new sidewalks (and potentially colored concrete), new trees, better lighting, and the painted utility boxes and other decorative elements.
  • Bike friendly streetscape on Mott St.: will enhance the bike-friendly environment of Mott with more streetscaping, parkways, and neighborhood circles.
  • Healthy Streets at Evergreen Jogging Path: will enhance the health of the environment with more plantings along parkways, exercise equipment, a new crosswalk, and the removal of underutilized parking.
  • Pico/Aliso and Mercado Streetscapes (1st St.): will see improvements in wayfinding around the stops, including more trees (where possible), trash receptacles, and improved decorative panels
  • Improved Bike Network: will see the extension of lanes, enhancement of bike friendly streets, and placement of wayfinding signs.

And, while many of those improvements are welcome, some residents have raised questions about who the improvements are for. Designed to enhance the transit experience, they improve the areas in the immediate vicinity of Metro facilities (i.e. for folks coming in to explore the area), but do little to improve whatever lies beyond a short radius of the stations.

Many of the complaints I’ve heard revolve around the sense that the improvements privilege outsiders and leave key streets used by residents – Cesar Chavez, in particular – to fend for themselves.

Some complain that bus riders got short-shrifted. Elderly folk whose bus routes were moved around to accommodate the Gold Line further east, for example, now have longer to walk to a bus stop and still have no shelter from the elements.

Others ask if the enhancements will make it easier to bring in big-box stores and de-emphasize (or demolish) affordable housing. Or whether there will be enough of the right kind of assistance to local businesses so they don’t get pushed out as the area flourishes. Since many business owners don’t have easy access to capital or credit, own the properties, or even have proper leases, according to the LISC Institute, they struggle to make upgrades to their stores. Which means that pairing street investments with more programs that facilitate business owners’ access to assistance may be key to preventing them from getting steamrolled.

Some residents ask if these are even the right investments for the area at all. As trees began coming down, Nico Avina and folks from Espacio 1839 held a PoeTree event, both to highlight the environmental impact of removing trees in an area with very poor air quality and “the lack of investment in art spaces for youth in [the] community.” Using the streetscape as their canvas, participants attached poems to trees and spoke of their aspirations for the area, for the preservation of sites like Wyvernwood, and for investment that would benefit all residents.

Sidewalk repairs are truly needed in a number of spots. Sahra Sulaiman/LA Streetsblog

The complaints and concerns of residents are not unusual. Any time a massive project is slated for a historically underserved community, the list of grievances that have been unaddressed for years tends to be quite long.

However valid an observer might feel the complaints to be, they do speak to the challenge of finding ways to invest in lower-income minority communities in ways that benefit the entire area, not just the transit-oriented or other targeted sites. They also speak to the need for investments to be multilayered – such as having small business components, liaison organizations that work with communities, and allotments for affordable housing – so that the improvements don’t result in the kind of turnover that destroys the fabric of the original community they were intended to enhance.

At the same time, I thought as I strolled the corridor, we would literally kill to have some of these improvements in South L.A. A major problem there is that, without investment in infrastructure, developers are unwilling to invest in development projects. Without development, the city is unlikely to make investments in infrastructure. It’s a vicious cycle that has kept parts of South L.A. in a state of relative disrepair for decades. Even with regard to the Crenshaw Streetscape Plan (linked to the Crenshaw Line), there isn’t the same single chunk of money available to implement all of the streetscaping that Metro or the city would like at once. Some improvements will hinge upon development being attracted to the area, which means enhancements may be more piecemeal and come together only over the long term.

In short, it’s complicated.

Areas like Boyle Heights really need the investment and many people welcome the changes along 1st St. with open arms. At the same time, many people (some of whom are the very same folks who welcome the investment) want to know that the benefits of such projects will be distributed throughout the entire community so it can flourish and grow stronger as a whole.

Metro and the city have been working with residents and stakeholders (via a Community Advisory Committee) to try to mitigate some of the community’s concerns. But, as issues raised by residents illustrate, they may still have a long way to go in finding the right balance.

So, what say you about the project? How do you feel about it? How will it affect you or your neighborhood? Sound off below.

Need more information on the project to make an opinion? Find all the docs about it here.

11 thoughts on Eastside Access Project Takes Another Step Forward, Experiences Growing Pains

  1. The cutting down of over 90 trees was a huge mistake, they claimed that the roots were breaking up the side walk. The second photo posted shows that the sidewalk is perfectly fine the roots did not break it but yet the tree was still removed. If this were silverlake, echo park, dtla, or any other affluent area the resident would have been up in arms about this, but in poor Boyle Heights, no one gets a heads up, they just come and chop them all down. Replacing 2 saplings for every 1 mature tree is a crap trade off. It will take at least 30 years to get the same benefits from the new trees that the old trees provided. Spending 12million on less than 1 mile stretch of street is nice but there are many other areas that need help. BH being one of the oldest neighborhoods of LA has some of the oldest and most neglected infrastructure. Lets address that before we start pimping out an arts district.

  2. Yeah, I looked at a lot of the trees and didn’t see where they had made any serious impact on the sidewalks. But, in other places, they’ve made the sidewalks nearly impassable for disabled folk or people pushing carts or babies. Apparently, Metro had originally thought about revamping the tree wells, but that proved more complicated than expected. So, they just went with replacing the trees. They are going to leave a few ficus in place, but it does seem like the majority of them are slated to go.

  3. Sure removing trees that absolutely had to go is fine, I understand that. But 91 trees? “More complicated than expected” is not the same as had to be removed. There wasn’t even a single alternative proposed to the neighborhood for consideration. Honestly the street doesn’t feel the same. In an area with a 24% homeowner rate it’s easy to force change on the residents because they are generally not involved, especially one with a large unauthorized population. As a tax paying homeowner I think that the lack of notification and proposal of alternatives is bs and unacceptable. Like I said this would have never happened in another part of town.

  4. I’m just telling you what their reasoning was — it isn’t my argument.

    And, actually, this did happen in another part of town — 400 trees were cut down in Crenshaw and Inglewood to make way for the shuttle. I first found notices taped to trees and made a little noise about it last spring, and then things blew up–nobody had asked the neighborhoods if it was OK. And some of the trees slated for doom had been put in along King Blvd. by the community in a special ceremony specifically to honor Dr. King.

    It happens all the time, in other words. Taping notices to trees is often the most notice communities get. I didn’t even realize, at first, that the tree-cutting was tied to the Metro project… such a big project needed to have a lot more dedicated to informing the community.

  5. They are doing this in Echo Park, and partly for the same reasons.

    http://www.theeastsiderla.com/2013/08/axe-may-soon-fall-on-echo-park-street-trees/

    The ficus trees are really awful to the sidewalks and never should have been planted.

    Now, it would clearly be better for the community if they cut the trees in phases over the course of a decade or two, rather than all at once. Start with the trees that are currently causing large amounts of damage, and then gradually move to others each year as the replacements start growing in. But I have no idea what the logistical structure of that sort of thing would be, and whether it would be substantially more expensive, because you have to visit the site dozens of times instead of just once.

  6. I’m very aware of the echo park situation and that was my exact point. It’s not that the trees would not be cut, but that the area had a heads up. Locals at least had the opportunity to talk about the issue, there was no post anywhere about the tree cutting until it was done.

  7. This project didn’t happen over night.

    For the world trade center memorial park, they knew the park would open in (for example) 4 years. So thats when they bought the trees, ensuring that what they planted were REAL trees and not tiny sticks.

    Thats what they need to do here. Enough with shopping for the smallest trees on planting week – we need to plant mature trees, And the cost effective way is to set them aside when the project is being planned, which can be 2-5 years before the new trees get planted

  8. They’ve had meetings in the past, and I know they do consult with local stakeholders to a degree now (http://www.metro.net/projects/eastside/community-advisory-committee-cac/). But the extent to which that is done regularly or is of genuine utility is something I don’t know. I know, for ex., that ELACC has a Metro Work Group, and that they and other stakeholders were present at the press conf. in support of the project. But, again, finding out information about that has not necessarily been as easy as I would have expected. When I stopped in Huizar’s BH office to ask about the project and see if they had information they could give me, they looked at me like I was kind of crazy. I think your average resident would be pretty discouraged from trying to figure out what was going on. If you know more about that group or have participated in it, please do share your thoughts on the process…

  9. What’s sad to me is that they are planting 15 gal trees – small – where they can use some of the funds allocated for consultants and more plans to pay for 24″ box SHADE trees – that will mature a little faster and with proper pruning and maintenance will not break up the sidewalks. It costs a bit more, but hey, why not use that money for more streetscaping PLANS and not the actual PROJECTS for the people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Eyes on the Street: “YES, L.A.! YES, BUSES!”

|
It’s raining, in case you didn’t notice. Which can make the streets a bit dreary. And lonely, as everyone is busy hiding under things to stay dry instead of looking at what’s going on around them. As I rode my bike home from a meeting, I realized that the only people I was making eye […]

A Walkability Prescription For Downtown Los Angeles

|
Transportation has always played a dominant role in shaping our urban environment. Historically, cities were built around the basis of everyday activities on foot; consequently, the prominent urban form was dense, compact, with high concentration of mixed-use development. As transportation technology progressed, the design of cities dramatically changed, in many ways to the detriment of […]

Walkingabout Pasadena

|
Editor’s Note: The LA Times and the Pasadena Star News may have already written about last weekend’s Pasadena Walkabout, but only LA Streetsblog has a report on the walkabout written by Deborah Murphy, the urban planner and organizer of the event. Although the image of Pasadena provokes thoughts of majestic, tree-lined, and walkable streets in […]