NRDC/Move L.A. Push Governor on Smart Growth Bill, Praise Regional Plans

Over the last year, three large regional transportation authorities have passed regional transportation plans that tie together transportation, land use, greenhouse gas emissions and public health mandated by S.B. 375 in 2008. Today, a new study by the Natural Resources Defense Council and Move L.A. praises the Los Angeles, Sacramento and San Diego regional planning areas for passing these plans and promotes legislation that could make future plans even better.

Click on the image to see the full report.

Despite the passage of the first regional plans and the continued enthusiasm of S.B. 375, NRDC isn’t happy with the current state of plan. “…a plan is not enough,” writes Amanda Eaken at the NRDC Switchboard. “From the very beginning, we knew that we needed to bring new resources to these communities if we wanted to see the real change SB 375 envisions.”

As Streetsblog has discussed in the past, the new regional plans in San Diego and Los Angeles have significant drawbacks. In San Diego, local advocates filed suit against the plan arguing that transit, walkability and bicycling projects are pushed to the end of the thirty year plan so that highway projects can be funded earlier. They were joined in their lawsuit by State Attorney General Kamala Harris. In the Greater Los Angeles region, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health estimates a $40 billion need for bicycles and pedestrian projects. The plan allocates less than 3% of that need.

However, the authors have a solution: Governor Brown needs to sign Senate Bill 1156.

SB 1156 gives local governments a way to finance the projects and plans mandated by S.B. 375, save Californians money and help stop global warming. For example, projects within a “transit priority area” that received different benefits, approvals and government funds would have to be within a half-mile of a transit stop. It also would continue the requirement that cities spend 20 percent of subsidies for development projects for low- and moderate-income housing.

S.B. 1156 is authored by Senator Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento), the same Senator who authored 2008’s S.B. 375. It has already passed both the Senate and Assembly and awaits the Governor’s signature to become law.

“When Governor Schwarzenegger signed SB 375, we knew the law had the potential to significantly improve the California way of life,” explains Steinberg in a statement. “Four years later, the first round of regional plans have strongly embraced this vision. Governor Brown can help to ensure that California communities pivot permanently in the direction of sustainability by signing SB 1156, to give local governments the tools they need to implement these great plans.”

Streetsblog will provide updates when the Governor acts on the legislation.

  • There is NOTHING green or sustainable about throwing 1000s of existing buildings into landfills which are already 40% building demolition debris. This Bill encourages the demolition of 1000s of exiting buildings in the urban core which are usually historic and very well built so they can build new lower quality banal buildings with vinyl building products that contain very toxic PVCs all in the name of smart growth. Green development should 1st and foremost rehab existing buildings not destroy. This is a big fraud being pushed by the giant building industry developers who run the state.

  • Shame on you for supporting this fraud. NRDC is also a fraud along w/ the Sierra Club. both groups work with and for the developers not the environment. Greenpeace is the only legit environmental group left.

  • Are you guys just naive or are you working for developers because you will lose all credibility for supporting SB 1156 and SB 375 if you genuinely care about the environment.

  • calwatch

    On the other hand, being for the environment does not being for no growth. The Greenpeace model would throw us back into the 18th century, and is incompatible with our free market economic system. We should be channeling development appropriately and planning for our population growth, rather than being stagnant and ultimately collapsing catastrophically due to peak oil and climate change.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

“This Plan Will Make Air Pollution a Relic of Our History”

|
Earlier today, the Southern California Association of Governments unanimously passed the 2015-2035 Long Range Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy to guide local transportation planning and investment in the six county region SCAG oversees.  While past SCAG plans have focused on building out the highway network, this plan conforms to new state laws requiring that transportation planning […]

Regional Agencies Taking Slow Walk Towards Sustainable Funding

|
In recent weeks, regional transportation agencies in Southern California have made some slow moves towards embracing a more sustainable transportation network throughout the Southland.  Local “Metropolitan Planning Organization” the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is poised to pass a long term plan that would dramatically increase bicycle and pedestrian funding while its sister agency […]

San Diego County Sets Aside $2.5 BILLION for Bicycles and Pedestrians

|
Earlier this week, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported that the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) allocated $2.58 billion of their thirty year plan for bicycling and pedestrian infrastructure improvements.  If that seems like a big number, it is.  While Los Angeles has been celebrating it’s Bike Plan, and the Measure R set-aside that’s going […]

Streetsblog Interview: Michael Woo

|
Michael Woo has a long history fighting for a cleaner Los Angeles.  In the late 1980’s, he was the rare City Councilman who was also a trained urban planner and had a strong showing in the 1993 Mayoral Election coming up short to Mayor Riordan.  He currently teaches urban planning at USC, and consultant to […]