Beverly Hills Brings Its Best Face and Smartest Brains to Yesterday’s Subway Hearing

View more videos at:

Yesterday afternoon must have been surreal for Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.  At noon, he delivered remarks to an audience of 1,200 of L.A.’s elite at the Westin Bonaventure as part of the Center City Association’s “Treasures” awards.  Jokes about the lackluster performance of the Lakers in the past couple of days were contrasted with the upbeat feelings some have about the suddenly hot Los Angeles Kings and the soccer champions with the Los Angeles Galaxy.  The Mayor avoided having his picture taken with newly minted “treasure” Hugh Hefner.

But the real contrast came an hour and a half later when the crowd of 1,200 cheering Angelenos was traded for several hundred skeptical and irritated residents of Beverly Hills who traveled to Metro headquarters to hear the last effort of Beverly Hills’ seismic experts to convince the Metro Board of Directors that the safest and best route for the Westside Subway will not take it under Beverly Hills.  Instead of hanging out with Hef, Villaraigosa was waiting for Metro Board Member Mel Wilson to call in to a hearing, and when that didn’t work out had to appoint a temporary Board Member to meet quorum.

For those of you just joining us, officials and residents from Beverly Hills are waging open war on the preferred Westside Subway expansion route that would take the subway under the high school.  The Metro Board of Directors was poised to approve the route at last month’s board meeting, citing seismic and geological reports conducted on behalf of the agency until the Beverly Hills City Council requested yesterday’s hearing at an emergency meeting held days before the scheduled Metro Board meeting.

Early reports from the yesterday’s hearing hint that the three hours of testimony didn’t change many minds.  Supervisor Mike Antonovich told the Times that the Beverly Hills’ experts made a good case and chided Villaraigosa for trying to “shove the route down their throats.”  Richard Katz, a Villaraigosa appointee to the Board, sounded more skeptical.

Whether the lack of change is a result of Beverly Hills not proving its scientific point, or because the Metro Board had as much of a chance to understand the science as I did, or whether the fix really is in in Metro headquarters will most likely be determined by a judge.  Representatives of the hills wasted no time clarifying that if and when the Board approves a route that goes under the high school, that a legal challenge under the state’s CEQA environmental law would soon follow.

Once quorum was sort-of established, the presentation was dominated by reports from Beverly Hills’ experts.  Opening arguments and a series of objections came from a trio of lawyers,  Larry Weiner, Kevin Brogan and Robert McMurry. Even if the day wasn’t won inside the Board room, media reports ranging from a “live blog” on Patch to television reports were dominated by Beverly Hills’ take on the subway route.  Instead of bringing its own experts, Metro submitted their reports for the record, basically yielding the media day to the team from Beverly Hills.

Of course, almost all media made mention of the silly “Beverly Hillbillies” YouTube spoof video which stood in stark contrast to the serious and intelligent discussion that happened in the Metro Board Room yesterday.

The first scientist called was Philip Buchiarell from Leighton Consulting.  Buchiarell brought maps showing where his firm discovered faults around the campus and city and pictures of the soil sampled that led to their conclusions.  Leighton consulting using a soil sampling method that is oft-referred to as the “gold standard” because it utilizes trenching, couldn’t find the trenches that Parsons Brinkerhoff found in their study of the school area.  Parsons responded by moving their estimates to other parts of the campus.  Their report is available here.  Metro’s response is available, here.

Next up was Eldon Gath of Earth Consultants International.  Gath reviewed the data by Leighton and found it to be solid.  He described Metro’s response as “frustrating.”

Following Gath was Miles Kenney of Kenney Geo-Science presented on his review of the original Parsons Brinkerhoff report for Metro.  Gath slammed the PB study noting that many of the active faults listed did not, in his professional opinion, actually exist.  Kenney agreed with the research done by Leighton consulting.  He conceded that there are likely faults along Santa Monica Boulevard, but that the faults are likely inactive.

Following a video presentation by Dr. Roy Shlemon, a consulting geologist that confirmed much of what had already been said, Tim Buresh, the lead engineer studying the alignments for the City of Beverly Hills and the former regional director for the High Speed Rail Authority in Southern California, attacked the ridership models that determined the preferred station.

Buresh claimed that the least expensive of the four station options for Century City, one placed under Santa Monica Boulevard with station entrances on either side of the street.  Metro rules out that station citing fault activity in the area, but Buresh argues that if Metro was wrong about the faults under Beverly Hills High School, as demonstrated by the previous witnesses, than it might also be wrong about the Santa Monica Boulevard fault that disqualified a station at this area.

The reaction to Buresh was different than that to the scientific experts.  Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, who is a supporter of the subway regardless of route, mocked Buresh’s assertion that the subway would be going “through classrooms” by asking if the High School was planning on building classrooms six stories underground.  Buresh responded that the school hadn’t ruled it out.  Board Member Katz mocked Buresh’s position on tunneling under Miramar College when he worked for High Speed Rail.  “Do you stop caring about kids at a certain age?”

Following Buresh’s testimony, there was no time left for public comment, which actually played to Beverly Hills’ favor.  Regardless of your position on subway routing, the staid intelectual conversation yesterday stands in stark contrast to the hysterical testimony seen at public meetings on the subway in the past.  If you’re trying to make people take your scientists seriously, it probably isn’t a good idea to hand over the microphone to the people that made video with the exploding high school.

The Board clarified that they will be discussing subway routing at next Thursday’s Metro Board meeting, but stopped short of guaranteeing route selection.  Public comment will be part of next Thursday’s Board meeting.

If the Board doesn’t vote next week, the politics of the hearing could change somewhat.  By July, Villaraigosa will be replaced as Metro Board Chair, by Mike Antonovich.

  • I can’t wait for this construction to be finished.  This will really help to cut down on my commute time (at least I hope it will).

  • BJToepper

    If the case goes to the courts — and I agree it likely will — the argument isn’t going to be about the science, as it was yesterday (and refreshingly so). It will be, instead, about the law — the adequacy of the various environmental impact reviews — as no judge is going to try to figure out which expert has the better data. If Beverly Hills has, in fact, uncovered some safety issues about tunneling under the high school, then it would behoove Metro to listen to them. If, however, Beverly Hills is arguing that any route to Century City is safe, as the experts seemed to say yesterday, then Metro should look at building the smartest route. To me, that still means Constellation.

  • MarkB

    I dont’ understand why 3/4 of the meeting was about earthquake faults not being under BHHS. So….how does that advance the agenda of not building under BHHS? If BH wants a stop on SMB, why not do their research there to show the suitability of that patch of earth?

    The speaker who said SMB would have higher ridership over the long term seemed like he was making leaps of faith by talking about redevelopment to come in future decades (redevelopment apparently not on today’s drawing boards), but time didn’t allow him to “show his work.”

    The only part I thought productive came near the end when BH presented alternative alignments to get to a Constellation station without going under (or through) BHHS. It seems like it’d be worth investigating those alternatives to see if one is viable. That might even be the economical thing to do if it avoids years of litigation.

  • Dennis Hindman

    Earthquake prone Japan has subways in 9 of their cities. I do not know of any instance where subways have posed a threat to the train passengers due to earthquakes. Perhaps someone could site an example of this happening. Its my understanding that if a earthquake does occur, the subway tunnel is nestled like a straw imbeded in a jiggling bowl of jello.

    Beverly Hills High is worried about explosions taking place due to sparks from tunneling igniting gasses that exist below the earths surface. Yet, Beverly Hills High has pumps on their property that draws up petroleum oil from deep beneath the surface of the earth. This is the same highly combustable substance that explodes in internal combustion engines. Funny, they don’t seem to be too concerned with this obvious danger.

  • I’m looking forward to the new Beverly Hills High School Station serving transit riding students, staff and board members. That’s really the concession BHHS is looking for from Metro.

  • NoeValleyJim

    NIMBYs blow.


Bev. Hills Courier’s Big Scoop: Metro Does Mailings

Century City Mailer for Web The Beverly Hills newspaper of record, the esteemed Beverly Hills Courier, has been doing its best to rile the residents of the 90210 against the Westside Subway route that would take the Subway under Beverly Hills High School The paper all but declared the Mayor a traitor to the city […]

Better Bike Beverly Hills in the Los Angeles Times

(The following letter by Mark Elliott, Streetsblog famous for his work with Better Bike Beverly Hills, appeared in today’s Los Angeles Times.  It appears here with the author’s permission.-DN) Re “Undermining the subway,” Editorial, May 30 As a Beverly Hills resident and safe streets advocate, I’m often asked, “Is everybody in this city against tunneling […]

Preliminary Federal Ruling Sides With Beverly Hills Against Metro Subway

Last week, United States District Judge George Wu issued a ruling [PDF] in Beverly Hills’ legal battles against Metro’s plans to tunnel the Purple Line subway beneath Beverly Hills High School. The Beverly Hills Courier portrayed the ruling as a victory for Beverly Hills in that Judge Wu chided subway proponents for “not properly considering the environmental effects […]