Mayor, Garcetti, and Englander Call for Exempting Auto Dealers from City’s Business Tax

Villaraigosa at the L.A. Auto Show in 2010. It's ok, we know you're only smiling because you're daydreaming about the CicLAvia you had ridden in the month before. Photo:Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images North America via ##http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/kpV7PylHLkl/Car+Makers+Around+World+Exhibit+Los+Angeles/AuMWBccjoVC/Antonio+Villaraigosa##zimbio##

Picture this.  One day one of the most important political figures in the city stands in front of a major Downtown attraction and announces that train service to this attraction will be increased dramatically in the coming weeks.  The next day, a major political figure, flanked by an up-and-coming political star and the City Council President, stands with the head of the local automotive dealer lobbying group and announces a political proposal to end business taxes for car dealerships.

In most parts of the world, that would be a sign of a hot political campaign with two candidates offering competing visions for a city’s transportation  future.  In Los Angeles, it’s just two days in the life of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.  While car dealerships are praising the Mayor’s proposal, supporters of green transportation options are puzzled by today’s announcement.

“This city can’t take too many more of Mayor Villaraigosa’s ‘business friendly’ policies,” writes Alex Thompson, President of Bikeside. “The guy extends Metro hours one minute, and decides he wants more car dealerships the next.”

Earlier today, Villaraigosa, Council President Eric Garcetti and Councilman Mitch Englander stood toe-to-toe with the car dealership lobby and announced a plan to end local business taxes for car dealerships operating in the City of Los Angeles.  The plan makes sense from a short-term economic point of view.  Auto dealers produce substantially more sales tax than business tax. In 2010, auto dealers accounted for only $3.6 million in business tax revenue but $29 million in sales tax revenue.

But the three pols see a potential sales tax boom if they can convince the car dealerships that have fled the city for Glendale, Pasadena, and Beverly Hills to come back.  Since 1986, the City of Los Angeles has lost 95 auto dealers. If those 95 dealers were still operating within the City limits, Los Angeles would have an additional $57 million per year in sales tax revenue.  In addition to the new tax proposal, Villaraigosa also announced that Beverly Hills Porsche is moving from Beverly Hills to Los Angeles.  The Mayor’s Office of Economic and Business Policy helped to persuade Beverly Hills Porsche to come to Los Angeles by pulling department directors together and speeding the permitting process.

“For too long, LA’s business tax has driven auto dealers outside the City limits,” said Villaraigosa.  “It’s time to reform the way we tax auto dealers so that we can bring more jobs and more sales tax to our City.”

Before Villaraigosa can sign a law exempting new car dealerships, the City Council would first have to sign off on a yet-to-be-drafted ordinance before the Mayor could sign the proposal into law.  Garcetti and Englander will introduce a motion asking city staff to draft such an ordinance at tomorrow morning’s City Council meeting.

Garcetti and President Bill Clinton check out the engine in the trunk of a mostly electric car. Photo:##http://www.calcars.org/photos-leaders.html##CalCars.org##

The public relations blitz to attract new car dealers was timed to come in advance of the LA Auto Show which takes place from Nov. 18-27 in the Convention Center.  Unfortunately for anyone looking to score political points off the exemption, it also comes a week after the Los Angeles Times decimated the Buy Here Pay Here used card industry which preys on poor people desperate for a car by trapping them in a cycle of debt and car dependency.  I’ve asked the Mayor’s office if their proposal would include used car dealerships and Buy Here Pay Here dealerships, but have yet to hear back from them.  An unintended consequence of this proposal could be to bring more of these vampire lenders and car dealers to the city further impoverishing those of lesser means and decimating the tax base of those already underemployed.

If the proposal doesn’t include tax exemptions for used car dealerships, then the Mayor and Council face accusations of providing tax breaks for businesses that only benefit top wage earners and not those selling products to the middle class.  And what about the message this sends the transit dependent who have already seen massive service cuts and fare hikes in recent years?  Subsidies for a Porsche dealership but fare cuts for the transit dependent?  And if will subsidize car dealerships, how about bike shops and footwear companies?

“If I had to speculate, I’d guess the Mayor’s economic development team haven’t talked with his transportation team, so one hand has no idea what the other is up to,” Thompson continues.

For their part, Garcetti and Englander pushed the idea that eliminating the tax on car dealerships is really a first step in eliminating the business tax altogether.

“Having owned a small business in Los Angeles, I know how difficult it is for them to get by,” writes Englander. “Every dollar makes a big difference. Eliminating the gross receipts tax is a crucial incentive that can help bring new businesses to Los Angeles and help existing businesses stay and thrive, create jobs and breathe life into our economy. Eliminating the gross receipts tax for new car dealerships is the perfect first step because they generate so much sales tax revenue and jobs.”

“It’s time to stop surrounding cities from using L.A.’s broken tax system to lure businesses and jobs away from us,”writes Garcetti. “Targeting car dealers is a big first step. But we must eliminate the business tax all together. L.A.’s costly and cumbersome tax scheme is one that taxes businesses even when they lose money. If we’re going to get our economy back on track, it’s simply got to go.”

 Meanwhile, bicycle shop dealers, most of which are locally owned as well as locally staffed are wondering where their tax breaks are.  After all, many of the dealerships are owned by people outside the city and L.A.’s existing locally owned businesses are struggling as well.
“Instead of pretending it’s 1945, why don’t we give tax breaks to industries with a future?” writes Josef Bray-Ali, the founder and co-owner of the Flying Pigeon Bike Shop in Northeast Los Angeles.  Bray-Ali is referencing the national and local trends where fewer people under the age of 30 are buying and owning cars while record numbers are buying bicycles or riding on mass transit.
  • True Freedom

    I think the current political landscape, on a variety of issues, is way too polarized.  This polarization leads to rigid ideological debates where both sides dig in their heels. 

    The same is true with transportation issues.  The rhetoric of: “you must be against the auto if you are for mass transit” falls into a rigid ideological stance.

    Really, we need to improve mobility while reducing the impacts of mobility.  However, getting rid of the automobile is not a realistic alternative.  What we need to do is to push on all fronts.  Make mass transit (bus rail), alternate transit (walk bike) more viable, which will reduce auto usage.. while at the same time, minimizing the impact of auto use by reduced/ zero emission vehicles, improved traffic flow (turn lanes, sync’d lites), improved parking, etc.

    Being too far on one side or the other will only impede progress.

  • Matt

    I have to agree with the Mayor on this one.  The auto dealers generate a lot more in sales tax than gross receipts tax and the City of LA is way behind in sales tax, which is why the revenue from the gross receipts tax is needed.  Ideally the gross receipts tax goes away, but we need a bigger tax base to do that (i.e. higher sales taxes).  It is a catch 22.  I am a big believer in complete streets, but what good does it do now to have all the car dealerships just outside the city limits?  It is not like this will affect how many cars drive in the city

  • Littlwjon

    What a stupid idea. Seriously, this is just completely bass akwards. As if the billions we give to private car owners aren’t enough.

    How about a tax break for independent contractors working from home? How many of the poor bastards have gotten the city’s blackmail letters to pay $16,000 OR ELSE?

    Tax breaks for car dealers, no EIR for $200 million + projects – but don’t you dare jaywalk, work part time from home, or work on your little underwater shack.

  • For the record, I would support getting rid of the gross receipts tax completely for the city, but that’s just me.  When you start picking and choosing industries to exempt, it makes a statement on what is truly important.

    And I do worry that exempting dealerships could get one of those creepy Buy Here Pay Here dealerships in a poorer area of the city and yeah,that could cause some real problems in whatever community is unfortunate enough to get it.

  • John

    I have to agree, on the surface, this seems like a bad idea.  However, after realizing most of the city’s revenue in this industry is from sales taxes, it makes more sense to exempt them, to get a bigger pot long-term.

  • Anonymous

    Given that so few automobiles are produced in the USA by USA-based companies, why is the mayor encouraging the shipment of capital to overseas factories and overseas-HQ’d companies?  

    These products are then powered nearly entirely by imported petroleum, thus  increasing the trade deficit.Funny how the mayor is not as protectionist when it comes to automobiles as he was when it came to where LA Metro’s rail vehicles will be assembled.

  • This is awesome!! I say we should make it easy for the business so they can create more jobs in the auto industry.

  • Anonymous

    More jobs at the Korean-moving-soon-to-the-PRC factories and more $$$ to Stuttgart, Toyota City, Kanagawa and Turin!!

  • Mark Elliot

    For us old-timers, the picture of the Mayor behind the wheel might recall the snap of Massachusetts Governor Dukakis atop a tank: an awkward moment with a political message at odds with the policy message. Let’s call this Cash for Clunkers Los Angeles Edition.
    Not for nothin,’ but by the time tax breaks arrive, the bike industry will not need them. Just like most federal subsidy rollouts. Lawmakers and their gifts don’t anticipate or precipitate an industry’s expansion, but merely respond to it, IMO.     

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Antonio Villaraigosa, The Transportation Mayor

|
Five years ago, I was sitting at my desk in New York City reading about Los Angeles and wondering how I was going to adapt.  Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa seemed obsessed with speeding up car traffic to the detriment of neighborhoods.  It’s hard to remember the Mayor’s talk of Tiger Teams, specialized LAPD units designed to […]