Cheviot Hills Homeowners Preemptively Declare Victory Obstructing Expo Bike Path

Will a bike path go here? The Cheviot Hills Homeowners Association Is Already Saying It Won't
Will a bike path go here? Time, and a judge, will tell...

A recent article in the newsletter for the Cheviot Hills Homeowners Association provides an amazing example of how two people’s viewpoints, and rhetoric, can present two different stories. When I first read the article from CHHA, I actually didn’t recognize that it was coverage of the same story I wrote back in September of 2010.

Last fall, a group of Cheviot Hills Homeowners filed suit against the proposed Bike Path that would run adjacent to the Expo Line claiming that the documents supporting a Categorical Exclusion for the project were flawed. A Categorical Exclusion (CE) would have allowed construction to proceed, sans environmental impact report, on the assumption that there would be no appreciable environmental impacts. In response to the challenge, Caltrans pulled the CE and the L.A. Department of Transportation went back to the drawing board to work on an improved application that would head off any court challenges.

While the LADOT will not comment on an active lawsuit, they did respond to a request for comment concerning the CHHA article, the entirety of which can be read after the jump. In particular, Senior Bike Coordinator Michelle Mowery was concerned that the CHHA article claimed that the funding for the project was in jeopardy, Mowery asserts that the funding is not in any danger.

It should be affirmed that no funding has been lost. Although, due to a lawsuit brought by Cheviot Hills attorney Zachary Samuels, the Categorical Exemption issued for the entire Expo Bike Path alignment, not specifically for Cheviot Hills, was withdrawn by Caltrans (the issuing agency), and thus the City is moving forward with additional environmental documentation as required for all federally funded projects. The bicycle path project continues to be viable and the City is still working with the Expo Authority to make the project a reality for Los Angeles.

One of the chief arguments we’ve heard from groups battling transit expansion is that they’re really really supportive of the project, but only if it take a form that is not at all practical or viable (read: excessive grade separations). We see that again in the CHHA article. For the record, the reason the Bike Path route changed from what was initially proposed was because the Expo Light Rail line was not a viable project at the time. Once Expo began moving forward with the LRT project, the bike project had to be re-routed.

Expo Bike Path Loses Federal Funding Due To Faulty Environmental Documentation

Cheviot Hills has long been looking forward to a bike path and our community’s support was instrumental in getting the bike path funded in 2001. At that time the MTA Board ordered the Exposition Light Rail to follow a route down Venice Boulevard and Sepulveda, which would avoid impacts to the residential community and to increase ridership on Expo. Under those circumstances the bike path would have traveled mostly on an exclusive right-of-way from Culver City to Santa Monica, including passing over two historic rail bridges and through an existing rail tunnel. Now, Expo’s current plan is to run trains through residential communities and place the bike path on streets and into the backyards of numerous residents adjacent to the proposed light rail project.

For the newly proposed bike path, Caltrans was granted a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) categorical exemption (CE); this allowed Caltrans to move forward with the bike path project without issuing an environmental impact report. Believing that Caltrans was granted the CE in error, a group of homeowners filed a lawsuit in federal court against Caltrans, the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, and the MTA. The homeowners claimed that the project would, in fact, result in significant environmental impacts. Besides forced taking of up to 15 feet of personal property, issues of paving, fencing, installation of lighting, security were also addressed.

Cheviot Attorney Zachary Samuels, speaking for the homeowners stated, “We were shocked and disappointed that the CE was granted behind our backs…. We shouldn’t have to wait until the bulldozers show up to find out what is going on in our backyards.”

A spokesman for Neighbors For Smart Rail (NFSR), who researched the bike path environmental certification issue on behalf of the homeowners, said, “This is the same kind of improper environmental study that has plagued the Expo project as a whole. We are pleased that the homeowners were able to reclaim their rights in this case. We look forward to the entire Expo environmental study being set aside and replaced with a proper and thorough analysis. Shortcuts inevitably short change the public. In the case of the bike path those short cuts were hiding some pretty obvious impacts to a substantial number of people, including bike riders.”

In the end, the lawsuit was settled. Due to the defendants’ inability to produce any documentation supporting their claims of no environmental impacts, the CE was rescinded and the $2.5 million in federal funds to build the bike path was suspended. The plaintiffs must be notified if and when any subsequent environmental clearance on the Phase 2 bike path is undertaken and, going forward, a new and verifiable environmental review must be completed in order to regain the lost federal funding.

Colleen Mason Heller
CHHA Light Rail Chair

  • Yuri

    Picking a legal fight over a bike path is incredibly small minded. The only one who’s winning here is attorney Samuels.

  • They need to re-name it a “gated service path”. Then, let us cut the gate open (see: Marvin Braude Bike Trail) and ride it like we own it.

    Bike path? What bike path?

    It’s not like the City is more pro-active about maintenance or safety on the actual bike paths and trails in town – so if this is just re-named “Service Road NAMBLA 35” and normal city operations commence to do nothing (as per the norm) it is a victory of everyone.

  • Scott Mercer

    “Now, Expo’s current plan is to run trains through residential communities and place the bike path on streets and into the backyards of numerous residents adjacent to the proposed light rail project.”

    This is a lie. The plan is to run the bike within the fallow railroad right-of-way. Always was, and is. It does cross over streets at intersections. It has to.

    But it does not, and never was planned to go “into backyards.” That’s just ridiculous. It might be next to some backyards, but that is NOT the same thing as “into” backyards.

    These Cheviot Hills Homeowners are a bunch of liars.

  • Scott, IIRC, the bike path is intended to go on top of private property, but property that is already under an easement for public use. So it wouldn’t represent any new kind of “taking” of property. Kind of a semantic issue.

  • Bob Zwolinski

    Fighting over the bike path now? Give me a break! It’s only 8-10 feet wide! There’s plenty of room for it in the ROW through Cheviot Hills and Rancho Park. It won’t impact anyone’s private property whatsoever!
    …and attorney Samuels is taking to the bank! Way to go!

    I really LOVE this quote: “At that time the MTA Board ordered the Exposition Light Rail to follow a route down Venice Boulevard and Sepulveda”.
    In reality, the MTA board ordered the “analysis” of the Venice/Sepulveda alignment to appease the Cheviot Hills Homeowners. The MTA didn’t purchase the ROW to have a chunk of it used exclusively as a bike path.

    It’s no wonder the politicians didn’t want anything to do with this potential rail line for decades. Who’d want to deal with THIS nonsense?

  • LAofAnaheim

    Anybody up for a bike protest in Cheviot Hills? We should do critical mass here!

  • LAofAnaheim – now that is a good idea. Maybe not a critical mass – but something smart ass and tongue in cheek that will chow what a terrible menace people on bicycles can be. You know, quiet, non-polluting, safe, and imparting a general air of fun into an area.

    But then again, these are small, working families in Cheviot Hills – battered by the recession, now the gubmint is taking their land!

  • Johnny John

    Oyyyyyyy… In reality, it’s seriously a very small population of Cheviot Hills Owners that are creating all this nonsense… most are very supportive! It’s amazing how a small minority can stall a project… just stall… that’s all…

    it will get built! :)

    Let’s all ride our bikes through the proposed lanes and takea video camera and then show ppl… we are not going INTO backyards.

  • Anonymous

    This post really shows a unique information about Cheviot Hills homeowners. And this information really increases my amount of knowledge about Cheviot hills.

    Homeowners Association Law

  • Very good post!

    HOA Management

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Cheviot Homeowners File Second Suit Against Expo Bikeway

|
A group of Cheviot Hills residents who’s property abuts the proposed Expo Bikeway on the Westside of Los Angeles have filed suit for the second time in two years alleging that environmental clearances given the bikeway were given in error.  Their first lawsuit, filed in June 2010, resulted in the City of Los Angeles and […]

Will There Ever Be a Bike Path for Expo Line Phase II?

|
It’s been a year since a group of Westside homeowners filed a lawsuit against the Expo Bike Path that would run adjacent to the rail line through the Westside into Santa Monica.  The homeowners alleged that the categorical exclusion (CE) granted to the bikeway (a technical term meaning that only a partial environmental review is […]

Settlement Reached Between Homeowners, LADOT on Expo Bikeway

|
Coming fresh on the heels of news that the California Supreme Court won’t halt construction while they consider an appeal filed against the Expo Line Phase II, comes news that a different Expo legal challenge has been resolved. Last May, a group of Cheviot Hills homeowners filed sut against the portion of the Expo Bikeway […]