Boxer, LaHood, Coming to Metro to Discuss Transportation Funding Bill
As Transportation Reformers continue to wait for the Senate to join the House of
Representatives with a sense of urgency for re-authorizing the federal
transportation spending bill; Senator Barbara Boxer and Transportation
Secretary Ray LaHood will hold a "Town Hall" type meeting at Metro
Headquarters from 9:30 A.M. to 3:45 P.M. The draft agenda for the day,
available via the announcement on The Source, can be found here.
Boxer and LaHood get on the same page. Photo: Associated PressIf this sounds familiar, it's because Boxer held a similar forum downtown back in September of 2008 where various officials from around Los Angeles, ranging from Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and then-Metro CEO Roger Snoble testified about their priorities in a federal transportation funding and policy bill. The basics of the hours and hours of testimony can be described in two terms: "new starts" and "ports." There was no mention of words such as "bicycle," "pedestrian," or even "Smart Growth."
The key to whether this "Town Hall Forum" is a chance to have a discussion of what various transportation stakeholders need and desire in a transportation re-authorization bill will be up to Boxer, LaHood and Leahy. Last time non-VIP's had to wait through hours of presentations by elected officials and bureaucrats before any advocates or other people that don't collect a government pay check. If this is really a Town Hall hearing, then hopefully all of the stake holders, including commuters that don't have a paid driver get to speak.
The Southern California Transit Advocate's Dana Gabbard agrees,
I'm glad to see Senator Barbara Boxer and U.S. Transportation SecretaryRay LaHood have announced they are reaching out to stakeholders seekinginput on the currently stalled federal transportationfunding reauthorization bill. Which is all well and good IF theattendees reflect a wide range of stakeholders, not just usualsuspects. Heretofore our region hasn't always done as well as it shouldin that regard. If a more diverse group of people see the process asbeing connected to their needs and concerns, maybe the chances wouldimprove of some progress occuring in passage of the bill sooner ratherthan later. At least the preliminary agenda includes some good conceptsfor discussion, including livability and safety.
I guess we'll have to wait and see for another nine days. Rest assured, this website will "go dark" next Friday, but we'll be live tweeting from Metro's Board Room.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog Los Angeles
No, L.A. City Does Not Always Add Required ADA Ramps During Resurfacing, But They Should
StreetsLA GM Keith Mozee "Any time we do street resurfacing, it is considered an alteration, which requires ADA ramps to be installed."
LAPD Was Crossing Against Red Light in Crash that Killed Pedestrian and Injured Six in Hollywood
The department says the officers had turned on their lights and sirens just before crossing, but won't say why they did so.
