Streetsblog Investigation Uncovers Secret Quasi-Governmental Cycling Organization

10_7_09_BAC_1.jpgA meeting of the B.A.C earlier this year. Photo: Ubrayj02/Flickr

Okay, so the Bicycle Advisory Committee isn’t really a secret. But it might as well be.

Stop any cyclist on the street and ask about the BAC. Chances are, you’ll be greeted with a blank stare – or insistence that he or she can still ride safely, despite a high blood alcohol content.

Yet for the last 35 years, the BAC has served to give L.A. cyclists a voice in the governmental process. The 19 members – four appointed by the mayor and 15 appointed city council members, one per district – provide a forum to address the issues facing local riders, with a direct line to the mayor’s office and the council, as well as the Department of Transportation.

Which is not to say they always listen, or actually do anything about it.

As the name implies, the committee serves an advisory role, with no legislative authority of their own. The power they have stems from the collective voice of the cyclists they represent; and lately, that voice has been little more than a whisper.

Take last night’s committee meeting.

Despite the fact that it offered the first opportunity to discuss the proposed new bike plan, only a dozen or so audience members bothered to show up. This in a city of nearly 4 million people, with an estimated 1,524,00 to 1,788,000 bike riders, depending on the methodology used.

Be honest. You weren’t there.

Unless you’re actually on the council, or your name is Bray-Ali, Box, Thompson, Roadblock, Smolarski or a handful of others, you were content to let other people fight your battles for you. Or you’re happy with the state of cycling in Los Angeles as it is right now – which is pretty hard to believe.

Or you had no idea there even is a BAC.

Granted, they could make it easier to get involved. It’s not easy to get to the meeting site in Downtown L.A. if you live in outlying areas, especially so close after rush hour. Yet there’s no mechanism in place to offer feedback or suggestions without being in attendance, unless you happen to have the email address of a council member.

The BAC’s website should provide an email address for every member, or at least a general form for providing comments that can be forwarded to the individual members. It could, and should, be updated more often to reflect to business before the committee, as well as other issues facing L.A. cyclists.

It should also offer a link to each individual council member, as well as members of the mayor’s staff and the DOT, so concerned cyclists can more easily reach out to the people who really do make the decisions that affect our safety and comfort on the city’s streets.

It also wouldn’t hurt if the local online media, including Streesblog – and yes, my own site, because I’m a guilty as anyone else – did more to promote the agenda and upcoming meetings.

The next one is scheduled for Dec. 1, so mark your calendars and get involved. Because the silence of cyclists are responsible for the bikeways, streets and policies we have now.

  • joe

    Can’t we get this meeting on a Saturday or something?

  • It sure would be nice if the BAC was made up of not politicians, but rather cyclists. We have the same problem in Long Beach with our BAC being made up of a professional racing cyclist, the City Manager, some of his weekend warrior club friends, and others that have “consulting” agendas.

    Shouldn’t BACs be made up of student-cyclists, cruiser moms, LCIs, bike shop owners/managers, traffic engineers and police?

  • Joe, I do think Saturday meetings would allow far more cyclists to participate, and since the meetings are only held every other month, it wouldn’t be too much of an inconvenience to the members. The only drawback I can see would be that it could exclude many observant Jews from participating, with is a concern in a city with such a large Jewish population.

  • Evan

    If the meeting was on a Saturday night, then that wouldn’t be a problem, right?

  • I think that having coverage of the BAC, and following up on the City’s response to the BAC’s actions will do a lot to increase pressure on politicians in charge of bicycle planning decisions.

    The meeting night will always suck for some people, as will the location. The city is big, and the BAC is a citywide organization. Downtown makes sense because there are a lot more transportation options for downtown than a lot of other places.

  • In 2006 NYC DOT had 6 bike/ped project managers in mid 2009 has 21.

  • All about priorities and what kind of city/communities do we all deserve. http://www.flickr.com/photos/comparator/4003908300/

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Bicycle Advisory Committee of the City of Los Angeles

|
To City Bicycle Advisory Committee members and other interested persons: The agenda for the next Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) of the City of Los Angeles scheduled for 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, June 1, 2010 is attached as well as copied and pasted below.  Once again the BAC will be meeting at the Hollywood Neighborhood City Hall […]

Helmets Ready! Mayor Hosts First Bike Summit

|
Former Mayor Richard Riordan presents training wheels to the wounded Mayor. For more pics from the conference, visist Gary Rides Bikes’ Flickr Page Despite the Monday 9am hour and the picture perfect weather, a standing-room only crowd assembled in the Metro Board Room for city of Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s first Bike Summit.  Alongside Mayor Villaraigosa […]

City of Los Angeles Bicycle Advisory Committee Advocacy and Education Committee

|
A & E will meet every other month at venues throughout Los Angeles.  Our next meeting is in your backyard (and mine) in bike-friendly Palms at the IMAN Cultural Center, 3376 Motor Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90034, on Wednesday, September 18, 2013, from 7-9 p.m.  Agenda attached and here:  http://labac.tumblr.com/.   The City of Los Angeles Bicycle Advisory Committee was chartered 40 years […]