Homeless advocate and wasteful spending watchdog David "Zuma Dogg" Saltzburg apparently wanted a head start on the pack when it comes to answering the Streetsblog questionnaire for Council District 2 candidates to succeed Wendy Greuel. Zuma didn’t wait for the questionnaire to be emailed, or even finished. Instead, he left his answers in the comments section.
1) When you commute to work, how do you do it? What percentage of the trips that you take don’t involve an automobile?
It’s a mix of bus and car for ZD, with a lot of rides with
friends places when possible. When my car is broke, I rely on the bus
more for periods. But I ain’t gonna lie, if I’m councilmember, I’ll
probably never take the bus anymore. You can’t waste that much time
when you are on taxpayer dollars.
2) Over the past year, a number of surface streets in the valley have
had their speed limits raised. Are these increases a result of the
natural order, or an interest that needs to be addressed? What, if
anything can be done to reverse these changes?
Briefly, it’s based on driving surveys they take in the area.
It’s based on averages of how fast people actually drive versus the
actual speed limit. So people always speed; so the limit gets inched
up. It DOES have to be addressed, because in many cases, the speeds can
become a little too inappropriate for the area. I have learned about
this through my discussions with CM Grieg Smith who educated me to this
3) The city is currently studying leasing the rights to its parking
meters and certain parking garages for a large cash payment up front.
Do you support this kind of financing ideas, and if so what kind of
conditions should be part of any agreement with a private firm?
MUCH better deal should for the CITY, not the bankers who are investing
in the deal. It’ll be a giveaway. The city will get ONE short term
payment to fill a ONE TIME hole…and we will be in the same crisis the
next year, and will have lost the long-term revenues these garages and
meters generate. NO!
4) What can the City Council do to reduce and prevent fatal crashes
involving pedestrians, cyclists and other vulnerable users?
WITH ME. Because my BIGGEST traffic pet peeve relates to this. I FIND
IT ODD THAT YOU HAVE PEDESTRIANS/CYCLISTS sharing the same traffic
signal as AUTOMOBILES. You have cars competing to make turns, with
pedestrians who are in their way. Think about it. Gotta time the signal
out differently. YOU JUST HAVE TO. IT’S A TRAFFIC CONGESTION ISSUE, TOO!
5) The former Council Woman for CD2, Wendy Greuel, chaired the
Transportation Committee. Do you want to be part of the Transportation
I don’t know about which committees yet. But that’s a
good one if you can get it!]
6) One of the ways that a City Council Member can effect change for
non-motorized users is by appointing informed activists to the city’s
Bicycle Advisory Committee and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. Are you
familar with community activists who could best serve an appointed
position on these committees?
You should have one of those people run
for City Council!
7) If you could change one thing about transportation in Los Angeles
with the wave of a magic wand, what would it be?
Less cars on the
road. (Rim shot!) But seriously, I DO think the issue of cars having to
wait for pedestrians to cross the road on the same signal IS CRAZY!!! A
car will spend the entire cycle waiting for the pedestrians to clear,
then the light turns red and you have to go against the red light just
for one car to get through, after the fact. THAT’S THE RISK TO
PEDESTRIANS, CYCLISTS…AND CREATES TRAFFIC CONGESTION.