Skip to content
by Damien Newton
Doesn’t it seem that the San Fernando Valley is less engaged in this than the San Gabriel Valley. The Daily News is thrilled about the Orange Line extension, and it’s certainly a good thing.
However, the San Gabriel Valley stakeholders are likely to get two Gold Line extensions, improved Metrolink Service and this new Silver line busway thing.
I’m just curious why the SFV isn’t demanding it’s piece of the pie. Is that its residents are still too hooked to the car culture to see any other possibilities?
I think it might be because of too large legislative districts at the state, county and city level where people who are representing the south San Fernando Valley, where the highest demand and ridership in the Valley are, are also representing the Westside, and are more focused on those projects. As a resident of the Westside, I sort of indirectly benefit from the San Fernando Valley’s lack of collective activism on this.
I did live in the SFV for six years, so I have an interest in this. I cannot imagine the stakeholders in the San Gabriel Valley being thrilled about or settling for a new busway to Montclair.
Whether one considers Arroyo Grande (Burbank/Glendale/Pasadena) as part of the San Fernando Valley or not, hey I have to hand it to the Glendale representative on the Authority who voted for Measure R even though it had not direct rail projects that benefited his area.
LOS ANGELES PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEYS
“A mileage fee sounds like a very big hassle, not at all worth its supposed benefits. Are we going to force people to report their mileage and charge them a surprise fee when they renew their registration?”
In response to "Thoughts at a Workshop On Replacing CA's Gas Tax With a Mileage Fee"
Email firstname.lastname@example.org or send them anonymously. Tag your photos, links, and videos with "streetsblog".