Assemblyman Wants to Know What Is the Cost of Employee Parking

4_30_09_blumenfield.jpg

How much does a parking space cost?

That question has been on a lot of people’s minds recently.  The City Council is trying to figure out how much its metered street and garage parking is worth and now State Assemblyman Bob Blumenfield wants to discover the cash value of employee parking.  A.B. 1186 would require that non-residential landlords itemize parking spaces on lease contracts so that employers can better compensate those that don’t drive to work.

Unbeknownst to many Californians, there is a state law requiring organizations located in non-attainment zones which employ more than 50 people and provide car parking also provide an equal benefit to employees who walk, bike, take transit, or carpool.  However, the law is rarely enforced, partly because many employers have no idea how much their employee parking is costing them per space.  Blumenfield’s legislation would address that.

A.B. 1186 is heading to a hearing from the Assembly Transportation Committee on May 11, and has garnered the support of many large environmental groups.  If you want to add your voice of support, Blumenfield’s office would be happy to hear from you.  You can email them at Assemblymember.Blumenfield@assembly.ca.gov

I wrote a draft letter in support of the bill to help you get started which can be found after the jump.

April 30, 2009

The Honorable Bob
Blumenfield
California Assembly
State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 9581

Re: AB 1186—Parking Space
Cost Transparency—Support

Dear Assemblymember Blumenfield:

I am writing to express my support for AB 1186 which would force non-residential building owners to quantify the value of parking spaces provided for employers.

State law requires that employers of 50 or more people who provide parking for car commuters in many parts of the state also provide a cash benefit to those that leave their car at home (or don’t own one in the first place) and commute to work by walking, biking, taking transit or joining a carpool.  However, because many landlords don’t quantify the value of a parking space, figuring out the value of the parking spaces becomes difficult at best.

Your legislation would require that non-residential renters itemize the cost of parking in lease agreements to clarify the cost of the space so that non-drivers can receive equal benefits.  When passed, this legislation will make it more cost effective for more and more people to seek alternative ways to get to work.

Sincerely,

xxx

  • Woot, parking cash outs! I love getting extra money every month at my workplace, and apparently so do all the other people who now stuff our bike racks everyday.

  • M

    Out of curiosity, does anyone know how you should be compensated for not driving to work? Is it normal to receive extra money in your paycheck as a transportation incentive, which is then taxed?

  • Most likely it is money added to a check, but it can also take the form of free transit passes, bike lockers, etc. More money is the norm though. Not sure about the tax, anyone else?

  • In the past I have been reimbursed for purchasing a transit pass.

  • I got parking cash out adopted at my work, and by giving up a parking space I get a cash value from the money saved on tight parking demands here added to every other paycheck. I imagine what it would be would vary widely based on parking demands, but for our company it comes out to over a hundred dollars every month.

  • bradpiit

    The society is facing problems with such laws. This has to go legal and it’s needed to be sorted at the earliest.
    parking sensor

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Gov. Supplies Teeth, but No Eyes, to Cash Out Parking Requirement

|
Supporters of cash-out-parking, the state law that requires employers of more than fifty people that offer free parking to employees to provide an equal benefit to those that don’t commute via automobile, were closely watching two pieces of legislation this session. The legislation was to fill two major holes in the state mandate, and while […]

Donald Shoup Destroys “Libertarian” on the Cost of Parking

|
We’re reprinting this reply [PDF] from UCLA professor Donald Shoup, author of the High Cost of Free Parking, to Randal O’Toole, the libertarian Cato Institute senior fellow who refuses to acknowledge the role of massive government intervention in the market for parking, and the effect this has had on America’s car dependence. It’s an excellent […]

Long Beach’s State Senator Lowenthal Takes on Parking Requirements

|
Last week, State Senator Alan Lowenthal (D-Long Beach) introduced legislation that takes aim at how California’s municipalities think about parking and parking requirements.  What S.B. 518 is missing in co-sponsors it makes up for in chutzpah.  If enacted, the legislation would require that every municipality in the state earn at least "20 points" in parking […]

Wait ‘Til Next Year: Parking Reform Bill Pulled from Assembly Committee

|
With the clock ticking, a state bill that would have banned parking minimums near transit nodes in certain circumstances was pulled from the July 3 California Senate Governance and Finance Committee agenda, shooting down major statewide parking reform efforts for at least another year. A.B. 904, a bill which waspraised by parking policy guru and UCLA professor Donald Shoup, appears to be dead […]