Lessons from Chicago: What Could Happen to Parking in L.A.
The biggest complaint that a privatization plan has is that such a plan almost always costs residents money in the long-run as the companies who sign the contract recoup their investment and then make millions or even billions over the course of the contract. That’s a big price tag to plug a budget hole and outsource the political will to raise parking costs.
The Chicago Tribune estimates that if Chicago pols had shown the guts to just raise parking fees at the same rates as Morgan Stanley, that the city would have brought in $1.5 billion over the life of the contract, over $300 million more than the initial payment the city received.
And, those rate hikes were pretty steep, all things considered. Assuming that Los Angeles follows the same model as Chicago, the first thing Angelenos are going to have to accept is that the cost of parking on the street is going to go up by a lot, and go up quickly. Following their agreement with Morgan Stanley, the city outlined a series of rate hikes that will soon give Chicago the priciest street parking in all of America.
While the impact of increased street parking is generally good news for reformers, increased rates have historically led to less driving, the Chicago model put none of the upfront money towards transportation projects. In short, they raised the cost of car driving, but did nothing to make other options more attractive. Originally, Chicago tried to sell the privatization scheme to residents by promising better bus and Bus Rapid Transit service. Somehow that part of the deal got lost in the paperwork.
So how will that $1.16 billion be spent? The website Progressive States explains:
The city plans to use $325 million from the deal to balance the budget through 2012 and to set aside $400 million for the long-term. $100 million will be spent on social programs, and the rest will be used to stabilize the city's financial situation until the economy improves.
The cost of parking “in the loop” would go up to twenty-eight quarters for two hours, or $7 in layman’s terms. This has led more than one local paper to worry that the meters won’t be able to function for long. Also, the deal abolished “parking meter holidays.”
As could be expected, there have been some glitches in the implementation of the program. Some reformers are complaining that it’s been impossible to trace how the $1.16 billion the city has received and the city government has been less than forthcoming.
According to Arline Welty of the Active Transportation Alliance, the privatized parking has also been an issue for cyclists. Because most of the parking meters have been replaced by what L.A. has called “meterless parking” there is suddenly a shortage of bike parking city-wide. To make things worse, Chicago actually decided where to place bike racks based on the availability to meters. The ATA is now working with the city to try and fix the new bike parking shortage.
Much of the information in this story was based on “Chicago Outsources Parking Reform to Morgan Stanley” by John Kaehny which appeared on Streetsblog on December 12, 2008.