Villaraigosa Frets That Service Cuts Will Cause More Crime

villaraigosa_resizr.jpg
Mayor Villaraigosa Discusses Metro Expansion at January’s Move LA Conference

Reacting to a "deluge of constituent concerns about these service cuts," Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa declared himself not ready to vote on the proposed "service modifications" at Metro’s Board Meeting earlier today.

The Metro Board is currently scheduled to vote on over 370,000 hours of bus service reductions at April’s board meeting. The cuts would go into effect in June of this year. However, Villaraigosa, along with County Supervisor Yvonne Burke and City Councilman Bernard Parks, presented a motion asking Metro staff for more information before the vote this April.

Specifically, Villaraigosa wants to know the crime rates, transit dependency, alternative transit services that might be available, the distance to alternative services and the expected wait for the alternate services in the areas effected by the service cuts. The Mayor also asked that the staff prepare an alternate set of cuts the board could vote upon in April that would not eliminate service in high crime areas.

"Before we cut service, we need to know who’s effected and what the effect is. Right now we don’t know that," the Villaraigosa concluded.

Supervisor Burke also spoke up about the impact cuts could have on crime. "There are places that at 10 P.M. you shouldn’t be standing at the corner. I don’t want to be responsible for putting people there."

Metro staff seemed unhappy with the Mayor’s proposal. Staff noted that any change in service to an individual line that change operations by more than 25%would have to go through the public process at the service sectors again. Such a process would take six months from start to finish and wouldn’t be ready for June.

The Mayor’s proposal, with friendly amendments added asking the staff to examine access to hospitals and another alternate proposal to save night owl service, passed unanimously. The report will be ready for the Metro Board’s April meeting.

In related news, earlier in the meeting the Metro board voted to move $43.4 million in unspecified funds from the FY 08 Transportation Improvement Program (T.I.P) to CALTRANS. These funds will be used to help fund 5 highway capacity enhancement projects. The Bus Rider’s Union was incredulous that such an item would appear on the consent agenda and asked what MTA projects would be effected by the transfer, but did not receive an answer before the motion passed by consent.

Photo: Damien Newton

  • Justin

    Its a little frustrating that funds are being moved out of public transit without anyone being willing to say what would be impacted. Is not like we have a lot of extra public transit dollars laying about.

  • L.A.’s mayor cares about transit ridership?

    That’s funny, I thought he was Mr. Automobile.

    I mean, isn’t he the mayor with a Transportation Deputy that drives a Hummer?

    Isn’t he the mayor who touted his “Tiger Team” to eliminate on-street parking, widen streets, and sychronize street lights – all in order to speed up automobiles?

    Isn’t he the mayor who brought appointed Gloria Jeff in order to secure more federal highway construction dollars for the city?

    This guy, it appears, doesn’t give a crap about anyone not driving a private automobile. All of a sudden he is concerned about bus riders? Yeah, right.

  • Dave H.

    Maybe I’m living in a bubble here in the Northeast, but you guys are cutting transit? Has ridership been going down recently too?

  • Damien Newton

    Ridership hasn’t gone down, but funding from the state got a major cut in FY08.

  • calwatch

    But he takes the bus into work every week. He even puts out a notice in the daybook on City News Service every time he does it “Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa to take Metro to work… intersection of Wilshire and Crenshaw Boulevards, Los Angeles”.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Metro Board Wrap: Votes for Cleaner Buses, Then Less Buses

|
Earlier today, the Metro Board of Directors approved a motion cutting 305,000 bus service hours in a surprisingly close 7-6 vote. In addition to the expected opposition from bus riders, concerns about the cuts were raised about what “replacement” buses will be created for areas where rapid buses will be cut and the total impact […]

Today, Metro Talks Cuts. Tomorrow, Metrolink Talks Hikes

|
The next two days will see two different board meetings, by two different local transit agencies, dealing with the same budget crunch almost every transit agency across the country is facing. At 9:30 this morning, the Metro Board will vote on whether or not to cut over 200,000 hours of service to its Class 1 […]