Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Streetsblog USA

Finally, a Little Accountability for State DOTs on Bike and Pedestrian Safety

12:01 PM PDT on March 15, 2016

In a win for bike and pedestrian safety, the Federal Highway Administration announced yesterday that it will require state transportation agencies to do something they have never had to do before: set goals to reduce bike and pedestrian fatalities, and track progress toward attaining those goals.

The news is part of FHWA's roll-out of several "performance measures" for state and regional transportation agencies. The system of metrics is supposed to make the agencies more accountable for the billions of dollars in federal transportation funds they receive every year.

Advocates for walking and biking pressed FHWA to include bike and pedestrian safety measures in the performance standards, after they were initially excluded. Andy Clarke, former head of the League of American Bicyclists, now with the Toole Design Group, said the League helped solicit more than 11,000 comments in favor of creating performance measures for bike and pedestrian safety.

FHWA must have been listening. In its announcement, the agency said, "Non-motorized safety is of particular concern and improving conditions and safety for bicycling and walking will help create an integrated, intermodal transportation system that provides travelers with real choices." Translation: The feds value walking and biking.

A report last week from the Governor's Highway Safety Association found that pedestrians account for a growing share of total traffic fatalities in the U.S., a trend that didn't get any better in 2015.

"The performance measure makes sure non-motorized crashes actually count, and are counted and recorded in a way that will hold agencies accountable for addressing the issues they raise," Clarke said.

"Having the non-motorized measure will mean that a more holistic approach to traffic safety is likely -- as safety gains for one group are less likely to be made at the expense of another if we are tracking both," he added. "We know that making the streets safer for pedestrians first and bicyclists second helps make the streets safer for everyone -- the same is not necessarily true for measures that are designed to make the roads safer exclusively for cars."

If the new reporting requirements make an impact, it will be thanks to increased transparency, not financial incentives. State DOTs will be required to track their performance on bike and pedestrian safety, but won't be penalized in any way if their "performance" is lousy. However, they will be forced to report that lousy performance -- which is a start.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

SGV Connect 121: El Monte and South El Monte, with ActiveSGV and Libros Monte

Podcast features ActiveSGV's David Diaz on various multimodal/complete streets projects - and Pedro Gonzales on Libros Monte and Mt. SAC's El Centro: Latinx Student Program

February 20, 2024

This Week In Livable Streets

CicLAvia, Metro lower 710 Freeway widening plan, C Line construction, Alternative Traffic Enforcement at Transportation Committee, street racing, and more

February 20, 2024

Two Thoughts on Measure HLA and How Hard Some City Leaders Are Fighting Against Safer Streets

Ballooning HLA cost estimates are hard to take seriously - for example, the CAO forecasts that unprotected bike lanes will cost $1.76 million dollars per mile

February 17, 2024
See all posts