San Diego County Sets Aside $2.5 BILLION for Bicycles and Pedestrians

Photo: ##http://www.flickr.com/photos/clintus/##Clintus McGintus##

Earlier this week, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported that the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) allocated $2.58 billion of their thirty year plan for bicycling and pedestrian infrastructure improvements.  If that seems like a big number, it is.  While Los Angeles has been celebrating it’s Bike Plan, and the Measure R set-aside that’s going to help make it a reality, we should remember that the total funding set aside for the Bike Plan hovers around $50 million of Measure R funds plus whatever grants the city earns over the same time frame as San Diego County’s multi-billion investment.

By comparison the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has yet to release a draft of it’s long-term transportation plan, but expectations are for a much lower allocation for active transportation projects.  In the last Regional Transportation Plan, a $530 billion plan adopted just three years ago, less than 0.5 percent of funding was dedicated towards bicycle and pedestrian projects.  For SANDAG, that percentage is over five times as big.  The SCAG region includes six counties, 190 cities and more than 19 million residents.

So why is San Diego so far ahead of the SCAG mega region when it comes to allocating sources for active transportation?  One reason is that SANDAG is embracing the mandates of the state’s Smart Growth Planning Law known as SB 375.  The Union-Tribune explains:

Two ways that those goals can be met are by developing more mass transit and elimination of highway bottlenecks. But regional planners also bet that in the land of sunshine more people will willingly get out of their cars and walk or bicycle, if the road ahead is made safe and attractive enough.

While 80 percent of the county’s commuters still ride alone in their vehicles, SANDAG estimates that 76,000 cyclists commute daily to work, schools and colleges. In a year’s time, they account for 94 million miles not driven by cars.

A second major reason is that local advocates have banded together and demanded change in the way SANDAG funds transportation.  Streetsblog talked to Elyse Lowe, the executive director of Move San Diego, and one of the leaders of this movement.  At first, it was just a small group going to SANDAG, as Lowe explains “When I first started going to SANDAG meetings two years ago it was just Move San Diego and the Bicycle Coalition and local transit riders representing themselves.”

Then, slowly but steadily, the coalition grew.  Walk San Diego began showing up, then a representative from CALPIRG.  Foundations such as the Ford Foundation began investing in groups working on implementation plans for SB 375.  The Nature Conservancy joined the party, as did Sustainable San Diego and housing advocates.  Soon the room wasn’t so empty.

Locally, there is a movement to reform SCAG’s funding priorities, but it is in a much younger state.  At the February meeting of SCAG’s Transportation Committee, 10 speakers rose to speak up for active transportation, although a handful of them were government staffers including LADOT Senior Bicycle Coordinator Michelle Mowery and Metro’s bicycle coordinator Lynne Goldsmith.

A third reason is that SANDAG just seems to have more respect for people that move by foot or bike.  For starters, they refer to cycling and walking as “active transportation,” not “non-motorized transportation” as SCAG does.  A more substantive example?  SANDAG spends $3.9 million to staff it’s active transportation program.  SCAG invests a cool $210,000 for “non-motorized transportation.” SCAG has an annual budget of $39 million, less than 1% of that budget goes for dedicated “non-motorized transportation” staff.

But the battle for SCAG funding isn’t over. Tomorrow Streetsblog will discuss more of what Angelenos are doing to reform SCAG’s funding and some easy ways for you to get involved.

  • Statsdude

    A more substantive example? SCAG spends $39 million to staff it’s active transportation program. SCAG invests a cool $210,000 for “non-motorized transportation.”

    I think you mean SANDAG spends $3.9 million while SCAG invests $210,000

  • @Statsdude, fixed it thanks!

  • roadblock

    HOLY FUCK BATMAN!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Regional Agencies Taking Slow Walk Towards Sustainable Funding

|
In recent weeks, regional transportation agencies in Southern California have made some slow moves towards embracing a more sustainable transportation network throughout the Southland.  Local “Metropolitan Planning Organization” the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is poised to pass a long term plan that would dramatically increase bicycle and pedestrian funding while its sister agency […]

How Will A.G.’s Legal Stand Against SANDAG Impact Local Planning

|
(Last week, we covered the surprise announcement from Attorney General Kamala Harris to join a lawsuit against the San Diego Association of Governments’ regional plan.  If you haven’t already done so, you can read that story, here.) When Attorney General Kamala Harris announced her office was supporing a lawsuit against the allegedly progressive long-term transportation […]

City’s Measure R Plan a Test for Villaraigosa

|
Mayor Villaraigosa Mugs for the Cameras at Opening of Dodger Trolley Back when Metro was preparing its project list for the potential funds that would be generated by what now is known as Measure R, there was a grassroots effort to get the agency a small set aside of the billions that will be raised […]