Streetcars and Development: It’s Complicated

Photo: Seattle Streetcar
Photo: Seattle Streetcar

Critics of modern streetcars say they are more a development tool than a practical mobility service. But are streetcars even good at spurring residential construction? Not so much.

A new study [PDF] of the Portland and Seattle streetcar systems — which are among the nation’s oldest of the current crop of light rail networks — found that the development impacts were ultimately were mixed as a development booster.

The first phase of the Portland streetcar — a 3.9-mile line which was completed in 2001 — increased residential and commercial building permits 45 percent compared to similar areas of the city, the study found. But the second phase — which extended the system to seven miles in 2012 — had no significant effect on development, authors Jeffrey Brown and Joel Mendez wrote in the San Jose State University and Mineta Transportation Institute study.

In Seattle, the effects were also uneven. The authors found that in the areas surrounding Seattle’s two separate, disconnected streetcar lines, commercial building permits increased 50 percent. Residential building permits, however, were 59 percent lower than the rest of the city.

The lesson for cities is that there are better incentives to spur development than simply using the “If we build a streetcar, they will come” approach, said Brown and Mendez.

Above all, the success of the streetcar as a form of transportation will affect development outcomes. They note, for example, that Portland’s 7.2-mile system is well integrated into the larger transit network and has strong ridership. By contrast, Seattle’s system — like many of the new generation streetcar systems — has had trouble attracting riders. Short modern systems — often operating without their own rights of ways —may not offer any obvious benefit over the bus, and indeed might be worse because of their limited reach.

“The lesson from Portland’s experience seems to be that the more effective a streetcar is as a transportation service, and the more it is used by patrons, the more likely it is to have development effects,” Brown and Mendez wrote. “Simultaneously, a streetcar alone is not a guarantee of positive outcomes, as other factors such as a healthy real estate market, land availability, development-supportive zoning and other policies also need to be present.”

By contrast, Seattle’s “two disconnected lines” “do not seem to be attracting very many regular users because of their inherent limitations with respect to speed, reliability, and geographic reach,” they wrote.

Seattle is poised to begin a new phase of streetcar construction that will connect the two lines into a much more functional system. Authors say that bodes well for development prospects around the line.

“Attracting residents to development along the streetcar is easier when the system can meet their transportation needs,” they wrote.

The study comes at a time when there has been a surge in interest in building modern streetcar systems. More than a dozen — in Kansas City, Cincinnati and, most recently, St. Louis — operate today, with more on the way. Some of the systems, like Atlanta‘s, have been disappointing from both a ridership and development perspective, while others, like Kansas City’s, seem to be performing better.

In New York City, Mayor de Blasio is keen on developing a $3-billion streetcar along the waterfront in two boroughs across the river from Manhattan. Those areas are already in the midst of intense residential and office development, so in this case, the mayor is seeking additional transportation to handle the quickly rising population in western Brooklyn and Queens.

But critics say his BQX streetcar would be no better than express buses on dedicated lanes.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Street Smart: Street Cars and Cities in the 21st Century

|
oin the national nonprofit Reconnecting America and the Seaside Institute, the American Public Transportation Association, the national Community Streetcar Coalition, the City of Los Angeles, and other sponsors for:  A WORKSHOP ABOUT STREETCARS based on the award-winning book STREET SMART: STREETCARS AND CITIES IN THE 21st CENTURY THURSDAY, MAY 22, 2008, 8:00 a.m.-4 p.m. Orpheum […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Planning a Streetcar? Better Get Your Zoning Right

|
Streetcars aren’t necessarily the fastest or cheapest way to get people from point A to point B, compared to, say, light rail or additional bus service. But cities around the country are racing to install new lines because streetcars can be a powerful tool for promoting urban development, of the walkable, transit-oriented, mixed-use, high-tax-revenue generating kind. But there’s […]

Street Smart: Streetcars and Cities in the 21st Century Workshop

|
(The following post was written by Ron Milam, longtime transportation advocate, co-founder of the LACBC, Eco-Villager and self-employed consultant. Read more about Ron at his website.  Also, our friend Darrell Clarke has more images from the conference at LA Visions.) Imagine streetcars returning to Los Angeles. Picture a modern, quiet streetcar going down Broadway in […]

Reminder: Streetcar Workshop Coming Tomorrow

|
A Streetcar Breezes Through a Downtown Plaza in Portland Street Smart, The Seaside Institute’s all-day conference on streetcars, and how Los Angeles could benefit by bringing a streetcar system back to our streets, is scheduled for tomorrow. I was planning on writing a long post about the conference today, but since I wrote a small […]

Streetcar Workshops Come to Los Angeles Next Week

|
Many of the Workshops at Next Week’s Conference Were Based on the Book Street Smart One week from today, the Seaside Institute will be holding am all-day workshop on streetcars at the Orpheum Theatre.  With the news last winter that the city is thinking of putting a trolley back on Broadway, this workshop could provide […]