Elon Musk Boring Company Test Tunnel Could Get Fast-Tracked, Blocking Metro’s Sepulveda Rail Project

Still from Elon Musk The Boring Company video - via YouTube
Still from Elon Musk The Boring Company video - via YouTube

Elon Musk’s ‘The Boring Company’ is planning a test tunnel that would be incompatible with Metro’s planned Westside rail. Instead of working with Metro, the city of L.A., led by Councilmember Paul Koretz, is pushing to fast-track the Boring project by exempting the test tunnel from public review.

Musk’s Boring Co is planning to construct networks of underground tunnels to move people around on high-tech platforms they are calling “skates.”  Initially, about a year ago, the concept was that these skates would move cars around. A few months ago, Boring’s tunnel concept was revised to also include pedestrians. The company released a conceptual map (see below) of a potential L.A. area tunnel network extending from Sherman Oaks to DTLA to Long Beach.

A lot of folks, including this Streetsblog editor, have expressed skepticism about the Musk’s tunnel network solving L.A. transportation issues.

The Boring Company is moving forward with plans for a 2.7-mile proof-of-concept tunnel. The Boring Company tunnel would extend underneath Sepulveda Boulevard from Pico Boulevard in West L.A. to Washington Boulevard in Culver City. The tunnel would go under the elevated Metro Expo Line at the Expo/Sepulveda Station and under the Sepuveda Channel creek in Mar Vista.

The city of Los Angeles appears to be fairly eager to support the tunnel. Urbanized reports that last month the city’s Board of Building and Safety Commissioners signed off on the proof-of-concept tunnel. At a meeting this Wednesday, the city council’s Public Works committee will consider a Koretz motion (council file 17-1342-S1) that would declare the tunnel project categorically exempt from environmental studies under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Boring Company's 2017 map showing 6.5 proof of concept tunnel in red. Image via The Boring Company
Boring Company’s 2017 map showing 6.5 proof of concept tunnel in red. Image via The Boring Company. Compate to later Boring map.

The full, year-plus-long CEQA study process can be bypassed under a regulation called the Class 32 Urban Infill Exemption, which is for small projects in existing urban areas. Specifically, projects must be under five acres to apply for this exemption. The 2.7-mile distance gets the tunnel in just under the five-acre threshold.

In 2017, The Boring Co concept map showed a 6.5-mile proof-of-concept tunnel extending from Westwood to near Inglewood. The 6.5-mile distance was reported widely in late 2017. With a 14-foot wide tunnel extending 2.7 miles, the project footprint (not counting on-ramps, staging areas) would measure 4.58 acres.

For a comparison, take a look at Metro’s Regional Connector subway project. The Regional Connector is a 1.9-mile subway under construction in downtown Los Angeles. Metro’s Regional Connector project features only two miles of bored-tunnels. That is less tunnel mileage than The Boring Company’s proposed proofing tunnel (though Metro’s tunnels are 21-feet diameter and Boring’s are 14-feet diameter.) Metro did an extensive multi-year full CEQA environmental analysis (plus its concurrent federal equivalent), which was then challenged and upheld in court. Can anyone imagine Metro trying to declare a couple miles of subway tunnels categorically exempt from CEQA?

Speaking of Metro, they too have plans to tunnel underneath Sepulveda Boulevard: arguably Metro’s mega-ist mega-project, the Sepulveda Transit Corridor. The $10+billion subway would connect the San Fernando Valley to LAX via rail. Project funding was already approved by voters via both Measure R and Measure M. The most likely alignment: Sepulveda Boulevard. A future Sepulveda rail line would most likely connect with the Metro Expo Line right where Boring Co’s proposed proofing tunnel starts.

If The Boring Company gets there first, then Metro’s potential alignments become limited. This would likely increase Metro’s project costs.

One of the people raising concerns is Juan Matute, a lecturer in Urban Planning at UCLA (and Streetsblog advisor). Matute teaches environmental assessment, including CEQA. He stresses that the Boring Company’s current proposal does not meet the requirements for a CEQA exemption, for several reasons.

Matute points out the proof-of-concept tunnel is clearly not a stand-alone project. Plenty of Boring publicity shows that it is part of a broader planned network. CEQA prohibits breaking large projects up into smaller phases to avoid studying the combined impacts of the full project.

In addition, Matute comments that the Boring Company should be applying to Metro, not L.A. City, as its 14-foot tunnels are incompatible with Metro’s 21-foot rail tunnels. Per Matute, “Public Utilities Code Section 130051.12(a)(4) grants the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority [Metro] exclusive right to approval of final rail corridor selections.” Further, if L.A. City issues Boring Co a tunneling permit it “would violate Metro’s rights to review and approve rail corridors” hence harming transit users by delaying or rerouting the planned Sepulveda Transit Corridor.

What is Metro saying about Boring’s test tunnel? So far, officially, the agency has been remarkably silent. It sure looks like the Boring Company is pissing on Metro’s fence, and the agency isn’t even barking.

Update 4/17 3:30 p.m. Metro CEO Phil Washington submitted a comment letter, dated today, stating “…based on Metro’s legal authority through state law […] all plans proposed for the design, construction, and implementation of public mass transit systems or projects in Los Angeles County must be submitted to Metro for approval.”

  • Juan Matute

    Worried about the proposed CEQA exemption for the Boring Company tunnel? Want to see full environmental review? Concerned it will preclude a Sepulveda corridor subway? Email the LA City Clerk to express your concern on the record: http://e-mailer.link/855340835727

  • Barf Brane

    This city and this country are totally incompetent. We have incompetent leaders and and incompetent public who continuously elect people like Koretz and idolize people like Musk.

  • com63

    They should force Boring to go somewhere else besides under Sepulveda. If it is a proof of concept, there are plenty of other places it could go.

  • Vooch

    They are complete amateurs

    Anyone who knows anything about TBMs recognizes that Musk is technologically a naive village idiot.

    Nothing Musk proposes for this tunneling is particularly innovative or creative. It’s 60 year old failed ideas lifted and repackaged from the pages of a 1953 issue of Popular Mechanics.

    Just wait until they hit a methane pocket.

  • Would emailing the City Clerk at CityClerk@lacity.org work just as well? I tried to use your link but I just lead me a page and email button that did nothing

  • davistrain

    I wouldn’t go so far as to call Mr. Musk a naive village idiot, but building cars that run on the public streets and highways, and spacecraft that just require a launch pad (not sure if he had his own or rents space from NASA) is different from building infrastructure that runs from “Point A to Point N”. “Boring” a tunnel is the simpler part–station boxes and access ramps and/or elevators are what take up real estate at ground level. And have we seen any recent reports about the Hyperloop scheme?

  • Juan Matute

    Yes. The link above is supposed to prepopulate an email program using a mailto: link, which doesn’t always work.

  • Econotarian

    Can we please have an environmental review of all the red tape this city puts on any kind of transit or innovation? Because every minute, more CO2 comes out of cars.

  • ExpoRider

    How can this not warrant an environmental analysis, just to address the volume of material being moved from the tunnels? By my calculations, each 2.7 mile tunnel will create over 50 acre-feet of material. The disposal of this material has to be addressed.

  • Rich B

    Yeah rush this project asap. Ignore any destructive side effects. What
    if a tunnel causes the collapse of streets above ground, or even homes?
    Awww who cares, just keep moving. Elon knows what he’s doing. After all
    he’s an expert in this field right? Right!?

  • FunkyBillyChin

    Sounds like your typical Muskian shuck-and-jive to me.

    No permits, no environmental impact studies, no 3rd party civil engineering review, no rights-of-way delineated, no compensation to private landowners (yes, what’s under the ground is still their property). Earthquakes, anyone?

    Just more BS.

  • Daimyo21

    Just here to clear up the BS.

    No one is “fast-tracked” in California, the toughest on environmental regulations than any other state. All permits and environmental studies were done just like everyone else.

    Metro is working WITH the boring company. “Pissing on metros fence”.

    I understand that this site is probably a smaller news site, but god damn does it smell like click-bait bullshit.

  • Joe Linton

    As the article states, The Boring Company was, at the time, pursuing exemption from CA environmental regulations. Only after the article was published did Metro CEO Phil Washington weigh in, after which Boring met with Metro.

  • Daimyo21

    The Boring Company funded and submitted their own 1500 page study on environmental impact, lifting the burden off the taxpayer so instead of waiting for 1-2 years for regulation to perform study. They did it for them in order to seek exemption thus the regulators could still reject. This is a research prototype tunnel to get community feedback. https://youtu.be/AwX9G38vdCE?t=33m16s