What Mandatory Parking Requirements Cost L.A. Renters

L.A.'s parking requirements cost renters about $1700 a year, whether the renter drives or not. Photo via WIkipedia/Rachmaninoff
L.A.'s parking requirements cost renters about $1700 a year, whether the renter drives or not. Photo via WIkipedia/Rachmaninoff
This article supported by Los Angeles Bicycle Attorney. Click on the bar for more information.
This article supported by Los Angeles Bicycle Attorney as part of a general sponsorship package. All opinions in the article are that of the author, and do not necessarily reflect those of LABA. Click on the ad for more information.

There is a new article making the rounds that sheds light on the true cost of providing parking in Los Angeles. The article is “If you’re renting a US city apartment without a car, 16% of your rent pays for parking you don’t need” by Michael J. Coren.

Most Streetsblog readers may be aware that one-size-fits-all parking requirements end up creating excessive parking, especially in urban centers. Though there are exceptions, the city of L.A. typically requires 2 to 2.5 parking spaces per housing unit. Generally, whether or not they own a car, renters typically pay the cost of building and maintaining that parking.

Coren cites a couple of studies that quantify parking costs. A 2016 study by C.J. Gabbe and Gregory Pierce found that garage parking costs renter households “approximately $1,700 per year, or an additional 17% of a housing unit’s rent.” The study estimates that overall in the United States carless renters pay $440 million annually for parking that they do not use. Coren, Gabbe, and Pierce point to the equity implications of  “this transport cost burden being effectively hidden in housing prices” stressing that required parking “imposes a steep cost on carless renters—commonly the lowest income households—who may be paying for parking that they do not need or want.”

Coren also cites a 2013 study by Michael Manville which found that Los Angeles City “parking minimums raised apartment prices by about $200 per month and price of a condo by about $43,000.”

Note that these are just direct costs to renters and owners. Parking requirements also drive up the cost of building new housing, resulting in fewer units actually getting built. The reduced supply also indirectly drives up the cost of renting or owning.

What is the solution?  Gabbe and Pierce suggest two policy changes that would help:

  • Cities should reduce or eliminate minimum parking requirements. This is already happening in a number of places, including central L.A, Lancaster, Buffalo, and Mexico City.
  • Cities should allow and encourage landlords to unbundle parking costs from housing costs – ie: instead of just charging a lump sum for renting both housing and parking, renters should pay separately for housing and for each parking space needed.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Donald Shoup Destroys “Libertarian” on the Cost of Parking

|
We’re reprinting this reply [PDF] from UCLA professor Donald Shoup, author of the High Cost of Free Parking, to Randal O’Toole, the libertarian Cato Institute senior fellow who refuses to acknowledge the role of massive government intervention in the market for parking, and the effect this has had on America’s car dependence. It’s an excellent […]

Some Highlights From Yesterday’s Live Ride Share Conference

|
Yesterday Transit Center, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Move L.A., and the Shared Use Mobility Center, joined forces with two dozen other organizations and businesses to host Live Ride Share. The conference was billed as the “first to focus on shared mobility in Southern California [and] highlighted […]