SPUR Talk: Big Data for Safer Streets
Is Cell Phone Data the Key to Making Cities Safer?
After the completion of the 14 Mission Rapid project, with its “red carpet” transit lanes, many motorists and business owners along the route claimed that traffic got more congested and dangerous. But a new analysis, released yesterday, shows a 36 percent reduction in speeding, a 30 percent reduction in fast accelerations, and a 21 percent reduction in hard braking on Mission. The study was done by Zendrive, a company that analyzes traffic using accelerometers and gyro-meters on drivers’ cell phones.
And late last week, the San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR) held a panel discussion about using just such data to get the facts straight and to improve traffic engineering, enforcement and safety.
Previously, traffic engineers and policy makers had to do extensive surveys and look at crash data over years to figure out whether an intersection or street treatment was working. Now, however, they can easily collect data on issues such as hard accelerations and fast braking, enabling traffic engineers to quickly identify problem areas and tweak designs before people are hurt. This is one of the keys to achieving “Vision Zero,” San Francisco’s policy commitment to eliminate traffic-related fatalities by 2024, said Leah Shahum with the Vision Zero Network and one of the panelists.
For example, local residents had objected that the transit lanes on Mission would push traffic onto parallel streets such as Van Ness, causing more delays and crashes. But the data shows a different story: after turns on Market and Mission were eliminated and the transit-only lanes were created, nothing changed on Van Ness. “It will cause traffic on parallel streets” is a common charge against road diets and traffic calming. But David Ragland with the UC Berkeley Safe Transportation Research and Education Center, another of the panelists, said the data shows that’s just not the case. “It’s counter intuitive… but hugely powerful for policy makers, who can go back to constituents with this information.”
Jeff Tumlin, interim head of Oakland’s new Department of Transportation agreed, and said he saw similar results with the bike-protected lane on Telegraph. “Telegraph used to be four traffic lanes, but we narrowed it to one lane in each direction, and did protected bike lanes,” he explained, and the data showed “we were correct. As expected, there were more cyclists, but it also improved conditions for pedestrians, too, without delaying traffic…. We doubled the number of peds, and eliminated the number of crosswalk crashes, and increased retails sales.”
That said, Tumlin explained that getting that data required “expensive and tedious hand counts–but it was critical for telling the story so we can do more projects like that.” Moving forward, information from Zendrive and other sources of cell phone data will allow cities to analyze street conditions much more quickly.
In addition to monitoring streets and intersections and improving designs, phone data can also be used to track individual drivers who are unsafe.
“We use data and information so we can monitor [things like] phone usage and sudden deceleration. We want to make sure kids in our cars are being driven around in as safe a manner as possible,” said Joanna McFarland , head of HopSkipDrive, a Los Angeles-based ride-hail service for kids. “We don’t want situations where you were doing things that might be reckless to get someone there on time,” she said. Geometric information from cell phones helps them identify drivers who exhibit risky behaviors. This is also something that Uber has experimented with–using cell phone data to see if drivers are speeding and making erratic maneuvers.
It’s interesting to note that the same technology that McFarland’s company is using to screen drivers of children may have even greater potential. Privacy issues aside for the moment, there’s no technological reason why police forces can’t identify speeding or erratic maneuvers and go after reckless drivers in real time, based on this same cell phone information. Some day, it may even be possible to send a citation or suspend a license based on geometric data.
Meanwhile, Shahum said she’s become a “data nerd” and is focused on using data to push for safer designs, especially now that pedestrian deaths are on the rise. “People are saying enough is enough and we need to change our policies and road designs–so much of this starts with the data,” she said. The panelists agreed that while smart phones are distracting drivers and causing more collisions, they can also be the key to reversing this trend.
“This will all help cities understand their transportation networks better and allocate resources. It helps substantiate requests from across the country,” said Mollie Pelon, another panelist and a technology expert with the National Association of City Transportation Officials.
Zendrive, meanwhile, has an interactive map of hard braking, acceleration, speeding, and cell-phone use on and around Mission from before and after the transit lanes were added. In total, the map reflects data from over 100,000 trips, 7,500 drivers, and 1.1 million miles driven from January to October 2016 along the 14 Mission Rapid project corridor
What do you think about the privacy implications of monitoring people’s driving behavior in real time? Should this be used to tag individual drivers or just as a street-design tool? Post your take below.
For more events like these, visit SPUR’s events page.