Cartoon Tuesday: Where Are Those Measure S Supporters?

It is no secret that Measure S, the so-called “Neighborhood Integrity Initiative,” is heavily funded by AIDS Heathcare Foundation president Michael Weinstein. AHF and Weinstein also bankrolled the recently-defeated Propositions 60 and 61 and was a significant funder of the anti-Measure M campaign.

According to a January 15 Curbed article, Weinstein and AHF contributed 99 percent of the recent pro-Measure S campaign contributions during the most recent reporting interval.

Clearly Weinstein is behind Measure S. But does anyone else endorse this measure, which amounts to a ban on most new housing, affordable or otherwise?

GIF by Shane Phillips
GIF by Shane Phillips

Shane Phillips exposes the limits of official Measure S support in the above GIF. Can the John Travolta meme find any real support for the housing ban initiative? Especially now that Leonardo DiCaprio’s supposed endorsement was revealed to be a lie.

The Measure S opposition column reveals a truly broad coalition. No on S is endorsed by labor and business, who often find themselves on opposite sides of issues. Affordable and homeless housing advocates oppose it, too. So do firefighters and police.

For those who don’t know, Measure S does two major things that threaten the future of Los Angeles as a sustainable city. It puts a two-year ban on any zoning changes or General Plan amendments. Given that the city of Los Angeles’ General Plan has not had a comprehensive update since just after World War II, a significant percentage of new housing requires amendments (from minor reductions in parking requirements to increased density near transit nodes) to get built. Measure S also requires that the city’s myriad neighborhood plans be updated, but given how contentious the update processes can be and how litigious supporters of Measure S can be when they don’t like the changes proposed to the community plans, it’s unclear how that component of the measure would play out in reality.

Given the severity of California’s housing shortage and our general need for more housing and jobs along our transit corridors to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase overall sustainability, Measure S could be devastating for the city.

Essentially, Measure S is being touted as a way to “preserve” Los Angeles. In other words, Measure S aims to halt any move away from the unsustainable, sprawling, auto-dependent Los Angeles of the past.

On March 7th voters will decide which direction they want to go.

Read earlier more serious SBLA Measure S articles by Brian Addison and Shane Phillips.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Election 2016: Measure M Passing, Local and CA Silver Linings

|
While Californians are waking up to the unexpected reality of President Elect Donald Trump, there are quite a few notable silver linings among city, county, and state election results. A few of these remain too close to call. Measure M, the L.A. County sales tax that would double Metro’s rail network, appears poised to pass with […]

Livability Advocates Dominate #RoadBond Hearing, Press Ignores

|
On Wednesday, the City Council Public Works and Gang Reduction Committee ordered city staff to study funding options for a bond proposal to fix city streets. You may remember Council Members Joe Buscaino, who happens to chair the Public Works and Gang Reduction Committee, and Mitch Englander proposed a property tax increase to fund a […]

Coalition Grows in Opposition to Proposed No-Growth Ballot Initiative

|
Communities United for Jobs and Housing, a growing coalition of affordable housing developers, community leaders, climate activists, transit advocates, and elected officials, has formed to oppose efforts by no-growth activists to pass a November ballot measure that would severely curtail, among other things, the city’s ability to address Los Angeles’ worsening housing shortage. Nearly 40 […]