Previewing the Future of L.A. Parking: 10 Parking Reform Recommendations

Map of parking meter districts in the city of Los Angeles. Image via Working Group report
Map of parking meter districts in the city of Los Angeles. Image via Working Group report [PDF]
Tomorrow’s 1 p.m. Los Angeles City Council Transportation Committee meeting will be the first public airing of the final report of Mayor Garcetti’s Los Angeles Parking Reform Working Group. In February, the Working Group delivered “Proposals for Parking Reform in the City of Los Angeles”: a 40-page report [PDF] outlining an extensive series of parking policies tailored to solve parking problems within the city of Los Angeles. The recommendations are far-ranging, including parking revenue, parking minimums, freight parking, parking ticket fines, street sweeping restrictions, and much more.

The Working Group grew out of agitation from the fairly-conservative Los Angeles Parking Freedom Initiative, but the mayor appointed a broader cross-section of parking reformers, including a handful of Shoupistas. As a result, the Working Group’s recommendations, like parking expert Don Shoup‘s, center on common ground, good-government reforms which would go a long way to fostering greater livability.

At this time, the Working Group’s report is just a set of recommendations. It will take political will, on the mayor and council’s part to enact these into law, and to embed them into an already strained city budget.

Below are ten of the top recommendations from the Working Group’s report.

1. Dedicate all parking revenue for mobility and parking purposes only 

The report calls for dedicating all city parking revenue – from meters, lots, and tickets – into “a secure, segregated Parking and Access Fund.” The Fund would be only used for two purposes: managing parking and improving mobility. Parking could including building additional lots or structures, upgrading technologies, etc. Mobility improvements could include pedestrian facilities, such as sidewalks and streetscape.

Shoup has long asserted that dedicating parking revenue to visible street improvements is a key way to generate the political will for pricing parking appropriately.

2. Change zoning code to address problems created by minimum parking requirements

The report criticizes outdated parking minimums for hurting small business, making housing less affordable, and worsening traffic congestion. The specific zoning reforms are not spelled out yet. Generally, the report states that parking requirements “should be balanced with other transportation goals in order to enhance transit accessibility and parking availability” with additional specifics forthcoming.

3. End handicap placard abuse

Handicap placard abuse sabotages parking meter pricing strategies. Allowing some drivers to park indefinitely for free makes it difficult to ensure an adequate supply of street parking at any price. Illegitimate placard users squeeze out space for people with disabilities who actually need it.

Though California and Los Angeles have done occasional stings targeting placard abuse, other locales have had dramatic success in reforming placard laws. The city of Portland, Oregon, ended free parking for disabled drivers in 2014. Severely disabled drivers, including actual wheelchair users, have an exception that allows them to park for free.

The city of Los Angeles cannot, on its own, end rampant placard abuse. Placards are governed by state law. Nonetheless, L.A. electeds have allies in the state legislature, and the city pushes for a state legislation agenda to solve L.A. problems.

4. Expand use of performance-based pricing 

The report urges the expansion of performance-based pricing, where meter prices are raised in hard to park areas, lowered in underused area, and are also varied depending on the time of day and day of the week. Under the L.A. Express Park program, L.A. already uses variable parking meter pricing for most of downtown. Express Park is expanding. It will be implemented in Westwood this year and in Hollywood within a couple years.

The report favors using variable pricing to encourage turnover, instead of the current practice of setting time limits, which could be abolished.

5. Charge drivers for only the amount of time parked

The report recommends implementation of “a payment in/payment out system that allows motorists to pay just for the amount of time they have been parked. Upon arrival, drivers would pre-authorize payment using a credit card, prepaid card, or phone payment and upon leaving the parking space, would then be charged the appropriate fee for the time parked.” As with performance-based pricing above, this would encourage turnover and likely discourage citations.

6. Charge tiered fines for parking tickets

The report recommends tiered parking ticket fines where “fines for non-safety related violations get progressively higher with each additional violation.” The report suggests the initial parking ticket would cost $23, then escalate to $33, $48, and $68 when a driver receives multiple citations within a year.

7. Adopt a freight parking program

The city currently cites large numbers of commercial delivery vehicles, especially in downtown Los Angeles. The report recommends developing a program to “provide adequate parking for freight delivery vehicles” and reduce parking tickets.

8. Re-evaluate street cleaning parking restrictions

The report recommends modifying street cleaning restrictions to serve Angelenos, and not maximize revenue. One recommended change would be to push back street cleaning start time to 9 a.m. Another recommendation would be “establish an online notification system that would email and/or text residents in real time when a street has been cleaned or a route canceled” to allow people to park during hours that would otherwise be restricted.

9. Re-evaluate Preferential Parking Districts (PPDs)

The report calls on L.A. to “modernize preferential and overnight parking districts” in order to “more fairly distribute the parking benefits and impacts across all users.” Among recommended PPD changes: minimize the fiscal impact of creating and maintaining PPDs, restructure the pricing of PPDs to reflect the actual administration costs, and evaluate the criteria and process used to establish new PPDs.

10. Use technology to improve parking

The report recommends “using information and communication technology to simplify a user’s interaction with the parking system.” Within this, the Working Group emphasizes the need for the city to post data (including curb restrictions, etc) using an open data format and to “foster the creation of third-party applications and other products that enhance a user’s parking experience.” In addition to the city’s own data, the report encourages the use of a common format that would allow users to access both city and private parking information together.

There is a great deal more information in the full report [PDF]. Streetsblog will be at tomorrow’s committee meeting and continue to follow L.A.’s expanding parking reform efforts.

  • Chewie

    Parking requirements and preferential parking districts are probably the most politically charged of the issues mentioned above. It boils down to two different visions of how parking should work. In the “Leave it to Beaver” vision, parking should be free and easy everywhere, and local residents should have priority over outsiders. This vision leads to policies like minimum parking requirements and preferential parking districts. The other vision is the “urban” vision where businesses and housing aren’t burdened with off-street parking requirements and parking demand is managed by prices instead of by trying to endlessly increase the supply of parking. This vision leads to Shoupish policies like eliminating parking minimums, charging market prices for parking, and spending parking revenue on local improvements.

    There’s still a lot of work to do to sell people on the urban vision of how parking should work, but it’s work worth trying, since there are so many benefits.

  • Asher Of LA

    Actually, that’s false. The current paradigm has made parking abundant yet often difficult, due to it being free or underpriced, and time-limited. Shoupian policies make parking less abundant but more available and time unlimited, by using prices.

    An SF survey found people – residents and businesses, value convenience and availability more than price.

  • Chewie

    I don’t think we’re actually disagreeing very much, if at all. It is true that some areas have an old-school urban form with not much off-street parking and suburban-style parking policies like no parking meters to deal with the high demand for parking. I noticed this when I lived in Koreatown. There was lots of parking demand on residential streets, but since there were no meters on those streets, finding a space was very difficult. One of Shoup’s major points is that pricing on-street parking can eliminate that problem if the prices are set at the right level.

    On the other hand, there are lots of pure suburban parking arrangements as well, where the built environment has lots of off street parking, and public policies work to perpetuate that condition.

    Very few places actually do everything that Shoup recommends, but some are closer than others. For example, DTLA has dynamic pricing of parking, but the revenue doesn’t all go back to the neighborhood and it still has off-street parking requirements.

  • Asher Of LA

    Ah, I see your point. I think most of LA proper, as commonly agreed by LA snobs (coast to East LA, the 10 up to but not including the valley), is more of the urban form. I imagine the code on those areas is more ‘suburban,’ but less parking is grandfathered in.

  • Jason

    A classic example is train stations where the lots fill up completely at 7 AM on weekdays. The parking is likely underpriced (or free when it shouldn’t be) if there’s consistently times of day where there’s absolutely zero slack in the available parking.

  • calwatch

    I tend to find PPDs objectionable because we all paid for the street through our taxes. Streets should not be used for permanent car storage. The cost for PPDs need to go up to cover the amount that could be lost by selling those spaces to the general public. A PPD map needs to be published – there currently is no single source of preferential parking district information in the City of Los Angeles. For the benefit of residents who do need to park, you can have one side of the street preferential, but the other side of the street should be general parking, with time limits or meters as appropriate.

  • neroden

    As someone whose fiancee has a valid disabled placard, I can attest that she is perfectly willing and able to pay for parking. But due to her arthritis she needs a space very close to her destination, or she will be unable to get there without injuring herself or stopping repeatedly.

    The only disabled people who should get free parking are those whose disability makes them incapable of feeding the meter, or incapable of getting from their car to the meter.

  • Dan Lafferty

    You find a spot, find a place to turnaround (legally), and when you look back…someone had actually turned their car right into the spot, they back up (illegally) and you’re left to just drive on.


Parking Reforms Advanced By L.A. City Council Transportation Committee

As expected, a suite of far-ranging parking reforms was heard by the Los Angeles City Council’s Transportation Committee yesterday. The committee was broadly receptive to the reforms, directing the city’s Transportation Department (LADOT) and other departments to further investigate a number of key reforms. What was perhaps most revealing was individual city councilmember attention to specific parking […]

Councilmember Bonin Introduces Seven Parking Reform Motions

Today, Los Angeles City Councilmember Mike Bonin introduced seven council motions [PDF] that would reform parking. The motions are wide-ranging: from diverting parking meter revenue back into neighborhoods where it is generated, to tiering parking ticket fines, to expanding dynamic pricing via Express Park. The motions grew out of recommendations from Mayor Garcetti’s Los Angeles Parking […]

Seattle Policy Honchos Look to Parking Reform to Make Housing Affordable

Buried under headlines about Seattle Mayor Ed Murray’s plans to battle “economic apartheid” are little-noticed reforms that would reduce or do away with parking quotas that inflate the cost of housing. Murray’s Housing Affordability and Livability Agenda (HALA) Committee released its recommendations yesterday. Noting that about “65 percent of Seattle’s land — not just its residential […]

Park(ing) Day L.A. Wrap and A Peek Into the Future of Parking In L.A.

Worldwide, last Friday’s Park(ing) Day saw street creativity on six continents. Park(ing) Day L.A. hosted a number of creative efforts that help Angelenos reconsider just what we’re doing with all that street real estate. Below is a quick run-down of some Southern California Park(ing) Day sites I enjoyed (apologies to the other great Park(ing) sites […]

This Week In Livable Streets

Support affordable housing, parking reform, and L.A. bike non-profits this week! Monday 10/26 – The L.A. County Board of Supervisors will consider a motion by Supervisors Ridley-Thomas and Kuehl fostering (and importantly: funding) more affordable housing. The meeting starts at 9:30 a.m. at the County Hall of Administration at 500 West Temple. Details on the meeting agenda and […]