Bay Area’s New “Vital Signs” Website Tracks Transportation Stats

Data lovers can now nerd out on a new website that collects Bay Area transportation data and puts it into customizable maps and charts to play with.

MTC’s new Vital Signs website provides data on bicycle commute rates and other transportation states for the Bay Area. Image: Metropolitan Transportation Commission

Vital Signs is part of an effort by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to make its performance measures and data more accessible to the public. It also lays the groundwork to measure the effects of Plan Bay Area, which was adopted in July 2013 after a state law mandated each region to produce a plan for smart growth oriented around transit.

The first rollout of the interactive website includes transportation data from a variety of sources, including the US Census. Land use data is scheduled to be added in March, followed in June by stats on the economy and the environment including job creation, housing affordability, emissions, fuel sales, and traffic injuries, according to Dave Vautin, a senior planner at MTC who is managing the project.

“This project is about transparency,” said Vautin. “We’ve opened up the data so anyone can do an analysis, mixing and matching data in about forty issue areas.”

Currently, users can inspect and play with data on commute mode, congestion, transit ridership, vehicle miles traveled, and pavement and road conditions.

News reports on the data so far have focused on traffic congestion (it’s bad, but reliable) and transit ridership, which has increased 3 percent since 1991, but reportedly declined 14 percent per capita. Users can also compare transit ridership among metro areas across the country.

A comparison of transit ridership in Los Angeles and the Bay Area since 1991. Other metro areas listed at bottom of chart can be added in. Image: MTC

Comparing the Bay Area to Los Angeles, for example, shows that daily transit ridership in LA between 1991 and 2012 increased 24.5 percent, while the Bay Area only saw an increase of 3.2 percent (see chart above). The numbers on per capita transit ridership in the Bay Area are worse, with a 14 percent decrease over the same time period, while LA saw an 8 percent increase.

Los Angeles has seen an 8.5 percent increase in per-capita increase in transit ridership since 1991, while it’s decreased nearly 14 percent in the Bay Area.

There remain some important data limitations. The US Census, for example, only collects data about mode choice for commute trips, which leaves out all other trips for errands, school, and entertainment. Census data has also historically lumped bicycle trips into the “other” category, which prevents Vital Signs users from seeing trends in bicycling rates as a share of transport mode choice.

The website feartures new data on street pavement conditions, allowing users to zoom in on a map street-by-street. That could be useful for tracking where bicycle routes are particularly pothole-ridden, if local public works departments have the resources to actually re-pave them.

Some other cities have similar kinds of mapping and data sites. Navigate LA has downloadable maps showing a range of data including census, housing, schools, sewer, and street information. But the MTC website goes a step further by making all of its underlying data available for download, some of it in spreadsheets and some of it as GIS shapefiles for mapping.

This is a first step, as Vautin acknowledges. “It’s premature to be declaring Plan Bay Area as a success or failure,” he said, “but over time we’ll start seeing trends.”

Share your thoughts in the comments on what other data you’d like to see, and how you’d like to apply it.

  • murphstahoe

    I would hypothesize – without a lot of research – that the Bay Area’s per capita mode share has dropped because the highest amounts of population growth have occurred in places with little useful transit.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

Latest Jobs Market

|
Looking to hire a smart, qualified person for a position in transportation planning, engineering, IT, or advocacy? Post a listing on the Streetsblog Jobs Board and reach our national audience of dedicated readers. Looking for a job? Here are the current listings: Executive Director, San Francisco Bicycle Coalition, San Francisco The San Francisco Bicycle Coalition’s […]

Excitement, Confusion Over Proposed Changes to CEQA

|
With today’s deadline looming for comments on new rules governing the way the state analyzes transportation planning impacts, many transportation planners and engineers remain confused about what the new rules might mean while others join advocates in hoping that new rules will create better projects. SB 743, signed into law last year, removes traffic Level of […]

CA Seeks Input on 2015 Active Transportation Program Guidelines

|
The California Transportation Commission (CTC) is seeking input on revised guidelines for the Active Transportation Program (ATP). The ATP is the main source of state funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects, mostly through federal transportation grants to local cities. The proposed changes to the ATP guidelines are mostly minor, but include eliminating the requirement for matching […]

Friday Job Market

|
Looking to hire a smart, qualified person for a position in transportation planning, engineering, IT, or advocacy? Post a listing on the Streetsblog Jobs Board and reach our national audience of dedicated readers. Looking for a job? Here are this week’s listings: Senior Associate, Transportation Policy, Center on Wisconsin Strategy, Madison, WI In 2010 COWS launched the […]