Assessing the Momentum of the Bike Movement in South L.A., a Year and a Half On

Cyclists from the Southeast Bicycle Alliance make a pit stop at the Watts Towers in South LA (Sahra Sulaiman/LA Streetsblog)

We’ve known for a while what NPR and the League of American Bicyclists appear to just be figuring out: namely, that people of color ride bikes and are doing so in ever-increasing numbers.

In fact, people of color have been on bikes for years, especially in lower-income communities. Spend a day touring South L.A. and you will see tons of folks on all kinds of bikes, many of whom have been riding for some time but have probably never filled out a survey to that effect.

So, it is hard to find recent affirmations that people of color are indeed on bikes all that interesting.

What is interesting, however, is the increasing diversity of the groups and reasons they ride, their tendency to use bicycles as a vehicle to advance unique forms of social justice, and what the growing recognition of their presence means for their ability to lobby for investment in their communities.

Most importantly, and despite their diverse motivations, the abundance of riders have coalesced into a loose “movement” here in South L.A. that draws its inspiration and strength from the community itself.

Although we saw a temporary boost in momentum last year, when the launch of a collaborative USC-based mapping project caught the attention of the press and occasionally enticed outsiders to explore the area, the South L.A. movement was and continues to be a truly home-grown effort. The fact that the clubs and other mobility-related initiatives have flourished in size, number, and scope of activities since the conclusion of those projects and largely absent external assistance, speaks to the vibrancy of the foundation in which they are based.

If there were any doubts that a movement was afoot, conversations with participants in the South L.A. Peace, Love, and Family Ride & Fair on Saturday would have quickly put them to rest.

If a diversity of groups was what you wanted, you could have chosen from the women of She Cycles 2 (a road cycling group of women of color founded in 2010), Coolass Mike Bowers and other supporters of 1000bikes (an org. that puts bikes in the hands of foster kids and families), members of the Real Rydaz looking to do more community-oriented work, members of the Biz-e-Bee Bikers (a new group out of Gardena), the World Riders (a group of older riders that formed last year), or Shuntain Thomas and members of We Are Responsible People (WARP), the club behind the event.

Shuntain Thomas, head of WARP (black t-shirt), with family and friends at the Peace, Love, & Family event Sahra Sulaiman/LA Streetsblog

Or, you could have gawked at the growth spurt in groups like the East Side Riders (ESRBC) and Los Ryderz, who have significantly deepened their commitment to what they do over the past year and often collaborate to broaden their reach.

These days, there is almost no community event or meeting in the area where you will not find the ESRBC on hand to offer free basic bike repairs or to lobby for a healthier community. Los Ryderz, on the other hand, have redoubled their efforts to help youth, with founder and president Javier Partida dedicating just about every free moment he has to mentoring and coming up with new activities and routes for the club to explore. Together, the groups have been active in setting up ghost bikes and leading memorial rides for fallen cyclists.

Apparently feeling that that was not enough commitment, Partida and John Jones III (pres. of ESRBC) put together an informal kickball league as a way to build community within the South L.A. bike groups and beyond.

The importance of what all these groups are doing goes well beyond simply raising the visibility of folks of color on bikes (although that is important, too, as the Black Kids on Bikes have shown).

John Jones III (ESRBC) and Javier Partida (Los Ryderz) speak at the memorial for hit-and-run victim, Benjamin Torres

Speaking with Jones, for example, he noted that working with Los Ryderz had turned out to be a unique way to improve black-brown relations. A number of the younger male riders grew up bullying others or being bullied because of race and/or participating in gang-related race “riots” at their schools (in which, regardless of affiliation or past beefs, Latino and black gang members band together with members of their own race to fight against the other).

Other riders — women and girls included — have experienced disparagement at the hands of someone from another race because of wider tensions in the community. Those past experiences sometimes make working together a challenge, as misunderstandings can sometimes arise among group members. But Partida’s and Jones’ unwavering dedication to cultivating mutual respect somehow continues to prevail, setting an important example of how to build bridges within communities where they are scarce.

Also noteworthy with regard to the rise of a South L.A. movement has been a growth in the engagement of cyclists (or the use of bikes as an organizing tool) by local non-profits, community organizations, and the city.

The South L.A. Mobility Advisory Committee, for example, boasts members from a variety of organizations as well as interested community stakeholders who are all dedicated to lobbying for policy that is appropriate to the specific mobility needs, habits, and aspirations of the communities they represent. While most of the participants (myself included, full disclosure) are cyclists, our ties to organizations focused on housing, education, health, pedestrian issues, and policy means that cycling events we host are understood as opportunities for more comprehensive engagement with both the community and the environment of the streets to which we hope to bring improvements.

Members of the Mobility Advisory Committee, city planning, and other stakeholders return from a bike tour of South L.A. (Sahra Sulaiman/LA Streetsblog)

Planners working on the bike plan and health and wellness issues have also taken time out of their weekends to join in on bike tours of the area, participate in community meetings, and set up shop at events (as they did this past Saturday). Their willingness to do so has made the city feel more accessible to some of those from communities that are more accustomed to seeing the city as distant and unresponsive.

That doesn’t mean that the deeper communication and outreach issues on the city’s part have magically been fixed, of course, or that the community immediately gets all the changes they want to see (sadly), but it is a major step forward.

At the event this Saturday, Lys Mendez’ and David Somers’ accessibility allowed for people to go beyond what Angelenos across the city are generally eager to tell planners, namely that they care about potholes, road repairs, trash removal, and better transit service.

Some of the suggestions and concerns people had regarding their neighborhoods. My personal favorite was "Free Food Jesus Fat" (Sahra Sulaiman/LA Streetsblog)

Jobs, safety, curbing prostitution and gang activity, youth centers, access to healthy and affordable food, and parks were on a lot of people’s minds. So were questions about what kinds of changes they could expect to see in their communities. Young, under-employed barbers sitting outside their shop, for example, recounted the challenge of finding steady work and their desire to see more legitimate businesses come into the area. Without some external investment in the area, they felt, the area was doomed to remain run-down.

Many speaking with me and representatives from Community Health Councils gestured across the street, calling out the massive, garbage-strewn vacant lots there as being particularly irksome. And with good reason: one of the lots was home to a swap meet building that burned to the ground during the 1992 riots. In 2008, the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) finally began eminent domain proceedings against developer Eli Sasson, who has sat on the land for the past twenty-odd years. But, the proceedings were abandoned with the dissolution of the CRA, serving as a lesson to residents and business owners to be careful about getting their hopes up about investment coming into their neighborhood.

Given that many of the folks stopping by the booths were on the bike ride and thus not from the immediate area, translating respondents’ needs in an applicable way or sustaining their interest in promoting those causes in the Manchester Square area will prove tough.

Still, the exercise was useful in that it got people thinking about how their commitment to participating in more activities like bike tours and resource fairs could help elevate their own communities. More recently formed groups like the World Riders, for example, were very pleased to make the acquaintance of representatives from the LACBC and planners, and appeared intrigued by the proposition of incorporating policy activism into their club’s mission — it wasn’t something that had been on their radar before.

Finally, but possibly most surprisingly, there were a handful of people at the fair that found out about the event via ads in the traditionally black papers, Our Weekly and the LA Sentinel.

That victory — orchestrated by the very capable (and persistent) PR ladies of Azcona + Rodgers — was particularly unexpected because of the reluctance of those outlets to promote other bike-related events or group activities in the past. Past efforts to engage them usually went nowhere or, as in one club’s experience, ended with the group being told what they were doing was not relevant to the community. Nevermind that the group was feeding the homeless and doing a community clean-up. Apparently, the fact that they were a bike club that used bikes to get to the clean-up site and distribute the food was what made them irrelevant.

So, the willingness of the papers to publish a promo of the event, and of a few of their readers to check it out, might be a signal that the cultural tide is shifting and riders of color are being seen as more mainstream in their own communities. People certainly do love to see groups of riders of color going through their neighborhoods (see a photo essay here) – they wave, smile, and shout out encouragement while hanging out the windows of their homes or cars.

Now, if we only could get people to be that excited when they see a lone cyclist. At present, drivers in the area are sometimes kinder to stray dogs that wander into the street than cyclists.

That said, the movement is genuinely gaining ground in the area. Bike shops are popping up all over the place (even, surprisingly, at auto repair shops) and people from the community are getting to know the clubs by sight or from community events. A number of residents have spoken of how heartening it is to see young people choosing to make a positive commitment to the community, especially in areas where the streets tend to play host to gang activity, crime, or prostitution.

Some even say it has inspired them to think about getting on a bike and joining in the fun, which is perhaps the most important marker of success. It means the clubs’ activism has helped them begin to think of the often contested streets of their own neighborhoods as places they, too, can reclaim as sites of recreation and community.

So, yes, hooray for the growing visibility of cyclists of color.

But let’s also give them recognition for their commitment to leveraging that visibility to transform their communities into safe, healthier, and more peaceful places for everyone.

  • ShanonM

    Great article, Sahra.

  • Anonymous

    Excellent, important piece Sahra. It does a great job of capturing the spirit of what we’re looking to do here.

  • Thanks for your work documenting South L.A., Sahra! You provide great evidence of how cycling can be a community empowerment tool if it stays tied to neighborhoods, rather than being reduced to a symbol of desirable urban development trends, as it is in places like Chicago (not to mention other parts of L.A…).

  • Mark Van

    Sahra, Thank you for the insightful piece on current cycling trends in L.A. Your work is helping all of us to imagine a different way of life. However, framing the encouragement of biking into a brown verses white issue in my opinion is counter-productive and plays directly into the hands of those who have a vested interest in its discouragement, namely the upper class. This is a trick used quite well by the ruling elite of this country for hundred of years to divide the working class and turn it against itself. Biking is dangerous for the rich, more people riding bikes means less people buying into the accumulation regimens of cars and gas. Additionally, as people bike more they become aware of their bodies and how what they eat effects them, calling into question how and where we get our food. By talking about race in relation to biking we invalidate the participation of all non-brown members of these communities and provide cover to advocacy groups who serve capitalist interests like helmet manufacturers, multinational bike manufacturers, and retail stores. Bicycles do not care about gender or race, to try and view their use in these contexts will only serve to divide communities further while the real issue remains unaddressed. Biking is not completely free however, you have to pay attention!

  • sahra

    Thanks for your thoughts. I’ll be honest and say I don’t quite know where you’re going with them. There is no us vs. them issue here, as far as what I was writing about goes. What I was trying to illuminate was that many riders of color — particularly low-income riders (especially those of color) who live in neighborhoods that are predominately low-income and of color — often approach cycling and activism in unique ways but have largely been left out of discussions of bike movements and cultures. Or they are painted as coming late to the party thrown by well-to-do riders who have taken up the bicycle by choice and their contributions are not always seen as important, since many ride out of necessity, can’t ride more often because they can’t afford their own bikes, or feel their neighborhoods are not safe enough for them to ride in on their own. The context is different, in other words, but their contributions are just as valid. The more people are aware of the different contexts that exist within urban areas, the way they constrain people’s options for mobility, and how communities respond to those challenges, the better policy we can craft to make streets equally accessible and safe for everyone. That’s not playing into anyone’s hands, as you suggest. That’s just common sense, I would think.

  • Mark Van

    Sahra, thank you for taking the time to respond to my issue, I think in your comments you validated my point that equity concerns should be in the context of class not race. “Well to do riders” as you put it shape the discourse on biking for transportation through their positions of power and have chosen to racialize the issue instead of addressing class inequality as the real conflict. Yes the nieghborhoods of L.A are diverse, these nieghbors have a commonality in that we are working class, regardless of our skin color or family heritage. We are all struggling under the increased corporatization of not only our working lives but also the social organizations whos mission statements are ostensibly to contribute to the social good. The reasons these “riders of color” as you call them,”often approach cycling and activism in unique ways but have largely been left out of discussions of bike movements and cultures” is because these movements and cultures have little interest in serving groups without financial benefit. Rather than celebrating their otherness why not celebrate the commonality the majority of cyclists for transportation share as members of the working class? Why not take the time to analyze first your own class standing and then relate it to how capitalist forces drive the culture of biking? In doing this I think you will find that behind the curtain, the real barriers to increased biking by the public lie.

  • sahra

    I suppose I could turn that around and ask what the utility is in lumping everyone into a theoretical category so broad (and almost, therefore, meaningless) that it makes practical action to right wrongs nearly impossible? Your position reminds me of that of a dear friend who was a communist organizer for a full decade before giving it up, frustrated that people were unresponsive to his efforts to educate them about class and revolution because their immediate needs were so specific and so overwhelming. He eventually bought a bike shop so he could be of more practical help in getting the poor from A to B. He still operates the shop in line with his principles as best he can and wishes he did not have to participate in a capitalist system to be able to help people. But, at the same time, he knows he is having a much greater impact on the lives of the poor and on building community in Watts than he ever did as an organizer. Thinking about the underlying systems at work is always important. But so is taking practical action, when possible, to improve the lives of those in need, and you can’t do that unless you look at the specifics. When you do that, you begin to see that lumping together the “working class” of Watts with the “working class” of the downtown arts district or Silver Lake makes very little practical or theoretical sense.

  • Mark Van

    Sahra, thanks again for responding,you said you wanted to ask me, ” what the utility is in lumping everyone into a theoretical category so broad (and almost, therefore, meaningless) that it makes practical action to right wrongs nearly impossible?” That is the point, the working class is a broad category of people and we are only growing. By recognizing the underlying capitalist forces that are shaping how we discuss biking for transportation we can better evaluate whether programs and services are in the interest of the majority of people or really only benefit a small group of recreational riders. This would be the utility of this analysis. By avoiding the trap of racialization and instead focusing on “practical action” that benefits people who ride the most real growth could be seen in biking for transportation. Creating discourse about black or brown participation in my opinion will only reinforce the historical polarity between these two communities and avoid discussing the real issue, bike infrastructure is the best way to encourage more biking and those projects are not happening at a level commensurate with participation in these communities. If what I am saying reminds you of a person who styled themselves as a communist so be it. In a capitalist system you have a small number of rich people making decisions for a large group, in a “communist” system you have a small number of rich people making decisions for a large group. What is the difference? With the ad hominem implications of your comments aside I would urge you to consider as an employee of a “non-profit” organization whether the work you are doing is really benefiting the greatest number of people or a select few.

  • tongku04

  • nice stuffs !!!!!!!!

  • Y M

    you might love this!


Streetsblog Summer Series Recap: The State of Cycling

We had a great turnout Wednesday evening for our summer series discussion on the “State of Bicycle Advocacy” in and around they City of Los Angeles. The run time on this particular broadcast ran a little bit longer than our others, so I’ve created a timeline breakdown of the issues we talk about through the […]