Touring The Future Expo Line Phase II Bikeway

Expo Bicycle Advisory Committee Rides Expo Phase II
Touring Expo phase II corridor by bike with contractors, planners, and Expo BAC members. Photo from the pedestrian bridge overlooking the trench right of way following the 10 freeway crossing.

On Earth Day this past Sunday, the Expo Line Phase II Bicycle Advisory Committee, of which I am a member, was given a tour of the Expo corridor and bikeway proposals with a few of the private consultants and public planners involved in the project. Looking at diagrams is never a sufficient replacement for some on the ground perspective, so I was glad we had this opportunity to scope everything out. It was also exciting to see a few testing trains in operation in preparation for tomorrow’s opening.  I had not had a chance to get out and see the trains in action previously.


A small contingent of BAC members and interested parties met up a little earlier than the scheduled meeting where Phase II begins, to take a look at the tail end of the Phase I bike route and get a sense for how it will flow together. While I am incredibly excited about the opening of the Expo Line, looking at the bikeway connections in Phase I did not inspire confidence in Metro and LADOT’s ability to plan for pedestrian and bicycle facilities to connect to rail stations.

As with many grand infrastructure projects, the engineering of Phase I overlooks many of the details of both form and function that matter to people at the street level. Either they still don’t get it, or Metro and LADOT just don’t care to make more than a minimal or required effort. What ever the case, bicycling was clearly the afterthought in the Expo planning and engineering.

Even simple and inexpensive things such as wayfinding are deficient, especially where on-street facilities transition to off-street paths. The crosswalk connecting to the La Cienega station from the northeast intersection corner was less than ideal. It is broken up by a right turn pocket with a traffic island. The island had landscaping across most of it, narrowing it to a small choke point, reducing the functionality of the island for people trying to get across and limiting standing room.

Even when building trains, it still seems that it’s all about the car in L.A. Getting a new bike route is better than the former lack of one.  In the case of the Phase I Bike Path, critical deficiencies at various points diminish the usefulness of this route as a feeder for the rail line or as a stand alone facility.  Metro representatives often remind me that cars take priority at intersections and cannot have their green time affected.  Bicycling ridership is modest, they say, never acknowledging that bicycling remains marginal because it is marginalized by design.

Take for example the absurdity of this post on bicycling safety along the Expo Line from Metro’s The Source. Riders are directed in the post to cross tracks as close as possible to 90 degree angles, but the bike lane striping pictured does not allow enough room to do so properly. Have none of the people responsible for designing streets and rail crossings ridden a bike since they were children? The depth of incompetence and lack of basic understanding of operating a bicycle within the American traffic engineering profession never ceases to amaze and dumbfound me.

But I digress, Phase I has been discussed some already here on Streetsblog, and Phase II is where we have the opportunity to make sure things get done right the first time (or mostly right, one can hope). I did not exactly have a glowing impression of how things might go as the official tour began to consider the Phase II bikeway, however there is hope this second half of the job could be done better. For one thing, the Expo BAC was not a public body that existed in time to affect planning on the Phase I route, so the first half of the project lacked oversight from people who actually know what it’s like to ride bikes for transportation. Until such time that engineers learn how to understand bicycles, this citizen oversight seems to necessary to prevent seemingly obvious blunders or missing subtle details that really matter to the experience of riding.

Expo Bicycle Advisory Committee Rides Expo Phase II
Glimpses of the old rail line are still visible all along the phase II scope of the Expo Line project.

The Expo Line project has been divided into Phase I and Phase II as separate projects.  In a way, Phase II provides a fresh start, although there are some design constraints already in place that apparently are not up for much debate. Stephen Villavaso, who led the tour of Phase II, and who is a designer on the bikeway portion of the project for the firm Skanska was responsive to feedback from members of the Expo BAC.  Villavaso, who moonlights as a member of CicLAvia’s Board and their pro-bono traffic engineer, really gets bikes.

More of Phase II will be in the right of way on separate paths, than on Phase I.  Once the route enters Santa Monica borders, I still have my share of concerns, but I am much more confident things will be well taken care of.

Santa Monica planners are all over the Expo Line, with bike, pedestrian, and land use planning for every station being carefully thought out. The city of Santa Monica has also shown a willingness to throw money and muscle behind station improvements where Metro budgets were lacking.  City leaders expect that successful station integration will pay back in spades with new developments and increased property values at adjacent sites. Nearly everything in Santa Monica’s long term general plan for the next 20 years is anchored around its three coming rail stations.

For those interested in this Phase II bikeway becoming a viable route between Culver City and West L.A. into Santa Monica, or for connecting to the train by bike, I would say the most attention and input is needed at the critical challenges in the route on LADOT and Caltrans turf. The two greatest hurdles that threaten to significantly diminish the connectivity of the route are the Venice Blvd. and Exposition Blvd. intersection, and the Pico Blvd. and Exposition intersection. Both of these intersections are big, busy, and have complex diagonal junctures.

Expo Bicycle Advisory Committee Rides Expo Phase II
Here at the Pico & Exposition crossing, bike path riders will somehow need to get here from the south corner over toward that palm tree.

These two intersections are also places where the train will be elevated to avoid the mess below, but the bike path will be at ground level. In the case of the Venice crossing, Caltrans operates the intersection.  That portion of Venice Boulevard is part of State Route 187. Pico & Exposition is under the purview of LADOT. Getting these two intersections to not completely suck for bike riders and pedestrians will be no easy feat, and a disruptive experience at one or both of them will significantly hinder the functionality of the bikeway.

There is a lot more to be written about what’s going on with Phase II planning, but I’ll be revisiting the subject more in the months ahead as the Expo Bicycle Advisory committee has more opportunities to dig into the project and debate proposals at contentious crossings. For more photos from touring phase two, check out my photo set on Flickr.

(Full disclosure: Damien Newton, who edited this article for Streetsblog, is also a member of the Expo BAC)

  • Thanks for this. Are there any proposed station designs for Phase II that are available to look at now, particularly with how they will look at the street intersections?

  • Expo BAC members have been given a print out diagram of the current route design including where proposed off-street paths meet intersections, and I have been trying to request that we get digital PDF copies as well so we can look at greater detail and more easily share with the public. Unfortunately as of writing this post I don’t have that document yet, but I will be highlighting it and the intersections I am most concerned with once I have it available.

  • Intersections seem to stump Metro/LADOT. The otherwise fine Orange LIne bikeway has one at Fulton that is totally counterintuitive and pretty much unsigned.

    The La Cienega crossing you mentioned is also terrible. You basically need a sign with a diagram on it for it to make sense to anyone who hasn’t already explored it, preferably on foot, to see where the heck it goes. And there is little reason to detour cyclists onto a little stub of offroad path (hidden between a concrete wall and a fence, great for thugs!) when the onstreet bike lane could continue for one block along Jefferson to the bridge, at least for the westbound segment. There’s enough width on that bit of Jefferson, and it would make for intuitive navigation.

  • cerwing02

    Thanks for the update Gary. While i’m sure you’ve already read this:
    I thought that other readers would like to read about specifics re the Expo Phase 2 bikeway, and the plans for navigating the the city’s topography.

    I’m curious to hear about progress of the bike path, especially where its planned to run behind homes on Northvale. Good luck securing the restricted use easment!

    As cylcist from mid city, I wish there had been more advocates focused on the bikeway in my neighborhood..

  • Cycling is Fun

    How can I can participate in Phase II bike route planning? I tried to get involved with Phase I (many years ago) at some of the community level design meetings the Expo Construction Authority sponsored, but I was met with mostly blank looks from the engineers and designers when I approached them at the meetings.

  • Josef Taylor

    Just a day ago the section on the bridge between Ballona Creek trail and Jefferson (@ National) got striped with a very silly S-curve. Do they think we can’t ride in straight lines?


Fear of Federal Oversight Imperils Expo Bikeway

Last month when I first looked through the environmental documents for the proposed Phase II of the Expo Line, I was encouraged because the maps included with the Draft Environmental Impact Review required by clearly showed a completed bike trail connecting Santa Monica to Downtown Los Angeles.  Appendix E of the DEIR actually includes a […]

Good News for Bikes in Expo Phase II

LADOT Environmental Documents for Expo Phase II Bikeway What a difference a few weeks make. Before the Thanksgiving break, Streetsblog reported on how many Westside bicyclists were concerned about bike planning for Phase II of the Expo Line.  While planning for the second phase of the light rail portion of the Expo Light Rail project […]

A Photo Essay of a Tour of Expo Phase II

When Stephen Villavaso, known to many Streetsblog readers as the volunteer traffic engineer who makes CicLAvia possible, asked me if I would like to ride along on a tour of Expo Phase II construction, I jumped at the chance. Villavaso is also one of the engineers working for Skanska-Rados Joint Venture – the design-build contractor […]