Nightingale Middle School Students Ask for Safer Streets for Bikes

When students first approached Nancy Chou about creating a bike program at Nightengale Middle School, the school had a bike cage for one or two cyclists that was opened and closed once a day by school administrators. Today they have both the above pictured "Bike Zone" and an active advocacy scene. Photo: ## Bray Ali/Flying Pigeon##

Dream It.  Design It. Do It.

The 3 D’s are the ethos of the D3 Lab of Nightingale Middle School in Cypress Park in Northeast Los Angeles.  The program is designed to help students learn to create change in their community.  Recently, the students waded into the world of bike advocacy in a campaign to create safe passages to their school along just less than a mile of road around their school.  Advocacy for school students is usually confined to Bike to School Days and bringing in bike rodeos, but the D3’ers in Nightingale want to take their advocacy on the street.

Specifically two streets that surround Nightingale: Cypress Avenue – from Pepper Avenue to Arroyo Seco Avenue (0.48 miles – immediately alongside NMS) and Avenue 28 – from Pepper Avenue to Figueroa Street (0.48 miles – one block from NMS).  The good news, both streets appear in the city’s Bike Plan and the five year bike implementation plan.  The bad news, there’s no plan to finish the streets in the near-term and the kids at Nightingale won’t be there forever.

After students expressed interest in a bike program, Nancy Chou, who heads the D3 Lab program at Nightingale reached out to the local bicycle co-op, the Bike Oven and local bike shop the Flying Pigeon Bike Shop to come talk to students about bike safety and advocacy.   Bike Oven founder and Flying Pigeon owner Josef Bray-Ali responded, and he brought CicLAvia consultant (and Streetsblog Board Member) Joe Linton to a student workshop on bicycling.

“I was really surprised to see all the interest in this.  There were a lot of kids at the bike rally and they’re interested in bicycling and making things better for their friends, for their school,” Bray-Ali said of the meeting.

After that meeting, the students began to set the agenda for safer streets themselves.  Jackson Huang wrote to Councilman Ed Reyes asking for the Councilman to take a lead in getting the lanes striped.”

“The LA City bike Plan of 2010 states that bicycle lanes of Ave 28 and Cypress Ave will be added. The reason why we need bike lanes is because there are kids in this area that are overweight or obese. Kids can get exercise while riding their bikes home and lessening the risk of obesity,” Huang pleaded.

Nearly a month later, Reyes’s office responded with a short letter that affirms the Councilman’s commitment to bicycle projects but wouldn’t commit to work on either of Huang’s proposed projects.    In an interview last week before Huang and D3 received the Councilman’s response, Chou informed Streetsblog that more and more students are writing letters and interested in safe streets.

For their part, LADOT wouldn’t commit to a timeline for implementing improvements on Cypress and Ave. 28, but they do imply that the ball is in the Councilman’s court.

“While these projects don’t yet have a date for implementation, Cypress Ave. and Ave. 28 are both in the five year implementation plan as Bicycle Friendly Streets, which does not preclude us from implementing bike lanes if bike lanes make the most sense for these streets,” writes LADOT Spokesman Bruce Gillman. “We thank the Nightingale Middle School students for their enthusiasm and we are happy to work with the Council Office to help prioritize these projects for early implementation.”

If the goal of D3 is to both empower and educate students in ways to improve their neighborhoods, bike advocacy is both a case study in what can happen and how frustrating it can be to make your case and wait.  Fixing Ave. 28 and Cypress Ave. are “low hanging fruit” according to Linton who has studied the Bike Plan and the implementation plan for both Streetsblog and the Eco-Village blog.  But the students’ enthusiasm hasn’t yet been enough to overcome  an LADOT that is waiting for leadership from the local Councilman and the local Councilman who has yet to understand the urgency of the projects.

But for the students at Nightengale, the need to create safe passages in their neighborhood.  During the spring break, one of the students active in the bike program was hit while riding his bike by two different cars.  While the student survived the crash and could be riding again soon, his friends explained to Chou that “these sorts of stories are pretty common.”

With a little more work by city staff and elected leaders, maybe it wouldn’t be.

  • Groan. LADOT’s Bruce Gillman is lying when he states “Cypress Ave. and Ave. 28 are both in the five year implementation plan as Bicycle Friendly Streets” – that is “Bike Friendly Street” vs. bike lane. Gillman should apologize to Jackson Huang, a middle school student who got the right lane designation in his letter. 

    In the 5-year implementation strategy document
    page 7 of 9 it states Ave 28 from Pepper to Figueroa, and Cypress from Gay to Figueroa – both as “Future Bicycle Lane”I thought that maybe there was error somewhere else, so I checked the facility listing the bike plan Appendix D ( see ) on page 10 of 91 it states Cypress Ave from Pepper to Gay to Arroyo as “Lane:Future”on page 37 of 91 it states “Avenue 28” – Pepper to Figueroa as “Lane: Future” 

    It’s sad, because these are the sort of wide streets with plenty of room for easy bike lane projects… but instead the DOT spreads disinformation about what has already been approved.

  • There’s definitely no EIR needed – these are big wide one-way streets where bike lanes can be added with no loss of car lanes.

  • Anonymous

    It may also help to enforce speed limits and tailgating laws, and conduct some crosswalk stings. A street without bike lanes is perfectly safe if bicyclists and motorists both obey the law.

  • angelica

    okay, so the “lie” is that Bruce Gillman is not overtly, directly stating that bike lanes are ALREADY in fact part of the plan. instead Gillman is using squishy terms like “bike friendly” and saying that if bike lanes are the best for the street, then they will be created.

    just trying to get it straight. 

  • Anonymous

    @62abc0e1e8b21a1d0d5886d1133a1a7b:disqus  – “Bicycle Friendly Street” is actually a technical term in this case for a certain set of road improvements that do not include a actual bike lane. 

    I have no idea if Bruce Gilman is lying or just mis-informed. But these road sections are slated to get lanes and Mr. Gilman is stating that they’re supposed to get less than this but that LADOT “might” decide to do lanes if they decide it is warranted. This is incorrect. Joe is probably making the assumption that this is a lie because LADOT has a bad history of well documented lies about this sort of thing and a tendency to make up their own implementation plans when they have a very specific plan that was approved by the city that they are supposed to be following. 

  • The bike plan has two designations: “bike lane” and “bike friendly street.” The bike plan says “bike lane” and the DOT spokesperson Bruce Gillman is saying it’s NOT in the plan for bike lanes. That statement is belittling the student, who got it correct. The student is right. The DOT is wrong. (I guess maybe Gillman doesn’t know, hasn’t read the plan… but then why on earth didn’t check his facts before he tells a Middle School student that the student is wrong? It’s disrespectful, insulting… and it’s basically LADOT falsehoods getting in the way of an easy project being implemented.) 

  • Ramon en el ATX

    DOT has actually been pretty pliable in the last two years. I wouldn’t be surprised if a good bit of consistent pressure and strong asks to the right people yielded bike lanes in 6 months, especially if putting a bike lane down wouldn’t affect car lanes. Get school officials and the PTA behind it, keep working Councilmember Reyes’ office, bug Antonio! His house was right up the hill in Mt Washington for years, he knows the neighborhood well. Get it on LACBC’s radar.

  • It’s even more infuriating that LADOT is bending the truth (or is just plain ignorant) for something that could protect children’s safety. We’re talking about making it easier for kids to feel safe and ride their bikes to school, and their official stance is  that they’ll consider bike lanes if they “make sense for the streets.”

    What about what makes sense for the young people who are using the streets?

  • I posted my take on being very disappointed with the city’s responses on this:

  • Alek Bartrosouf

    I was at Nightingale just last week for a bicycling event.  It was a good turnout and students continue to stay involved.  If anyone is interested in joining as a group and making sure these projects get implemented, let us know.  We’re looking for eager volunteers in the East region (Echo Park, Silver Lake, Eagle Rock, Elysian Valley, Highland Park, Glassell Park, etc) of Los Angeles.  Sign up here…


Santa Monica: From Bike It! Day to Biking Cross Country

Owen Gorman and Rachel Horn, two friends who’ve known each other since their time attending Samohi, are embarking on a coast to coast bicycle tour combining their advocacy interests along the way. The two college graduates were both part of the early student led effort to host a bike to school event on the Samohi […]

Best Practices: Bike It! Day in Santa Monica

In the fall of 2007, a pair of high school students in Santa Monica High School (Samohi), decided to organize their own Bike to School Day.  Somewhere between 80 and 100 high school students took part that first year, which is a respectable number for a student-run event with no budget, but nobody could have0for […]